倒角切角对方柱气动性能影响的大涡模拟研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献(21)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (3098 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要倒角和切角措施对方柱的气动力及流场影响很大，常作为方柱流动控制的手段，本文采用大涡模拟方法，以雷诺数22000的方柱为研究对象，考虑了角部措施(角部变化率10%)的影响，对均匀流场下标准方柱、倒角和切角方柱周围流场及气动性能进行了模拟研究。首先，通过将标准方柱大涡模拟结果与相关文献的试验和数值模拟结果对比，验证了本文方法及参数取值的有效性；然后，研究分析了倒角和切角措施对方柱风压分布和气动力的影响，并着重从时均流场和瞬态流场角度分析了角部处理措施对方柱气动性能的影响机理。结果表明：倒角和切角措施对方柱表面风压分布和气动力均有一定影响，其中对方柱表面流动分离区的风压系数影响更为显著。采用角部处理措施后，方柱前缘角区的流动分离受到影响，分离剪切层扩散角更小，侧面的分离涡更贴近壁面，从而在方柱侧面形成再附，尾流变窄，旋涡脱落频率成分更为复杂，使得方柱的平均阻力系数更小，气动力脉动强度更弱，旋涡脱落频率更高、强度更弱。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	郑德乾1
	刘帅永1
	马文勇2
	陈华为3

关键词 ：方柱, 角部处理, 大涡模拟, 气动性能, 流场机理

Abstract：Due to remarkable effects of chamfering and corner cut measures on aerodynamic force and flow field of a square cylinder, the two measures are commonly taken as means of flow control of square cylinder. Here, the large eddy simulation method was adopted to study aerodynamic performance and flow field of a standard square cylinder, and other two ones with chamfering and corner cut, respectively under the condition of uniform flow field considering Reynolds number for three square cylinders of 22 000, and effects of the two measures with angle change ratio of 10%. Firstly, the large eddy simulation results of the standard square cylinder were compared with the test and numerical simulation ones in relevant literatures to verify the correctness of the proposed method and parameter values chosen here. Then, the effects of chamfering and corner cut measures on wind pressure distribution and aerodynamic force of square cylinder were analyzed. The influence mechanism of corner treatment measures on aerodynamic performance of square cylinder was emphatically analyzed from the points of view of time averaged flow field and transient flow one. Results showed that chamfering and corner cut measures have certain effects on wind pressure distribution and aerodynamic force of square cylinder surface, especially, their effects on wind pressure coefficient of flow separation zone on square cylinder surface are more significant; after taking corner treatment measures, the flow separation in the corner area of square cylinder’s front edge is affected, the diffusion angle of the separation shear layer is smaller, and the separation vortex on the side is closer to the wall surface to form reattachment on the side of square cylinder, tail flow is narrower, vortex shedding frequency components are more complex, average drag coefficient is smaller, aerodynamic force fluctuation intensity is weaker, vortex shedding frequencies are higher and intensity is weaker.

Key words： square cylinder corner treatment large eddy simulation aerodynamic performance flow field mechanism

收稿日期: 2019-09-20 出版日期: 2021-01-15

引用本文:

郑德乾1，刘帅永1，马文勇2，陈华为3. 倒角切角对方柱气动性能影响的大涡模拟研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(1): 8-14.
ZHENG Deqian1, LIU Shuaiyong1, MA Wenyong2, CHEN Huawei3. Large eddy simulation for effects of chamfering and corner cut on aerodynamic performance of square cylinder. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2021, 40(1): 8-14.

链接本文:

http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V40/I1/8

[1] Mooneghi M A , Kargarmoakhar R . Aerodynamic mitigation and shape optimization of buildings: Review[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2016, 6: 225-235.
[2] Tse K T, Hitchcock P A, Kwok K C S, et al. Economic perspectives of aerodynamic treatments of square tall buildings[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2009, 97(9-10): 455-467.
[3] Tamura T, Miyagi T. The effect of turbulence on aerodynamic forces on a square cylinder with various corner shapes[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics，1999, 83(6): 135-145.
[4] Rodi W, Ferziger J H, Breuer M, et al. Status of Large Eddy Simulation: Results of a Workshop[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1997, 119(2): 248-262.
[5] 曹会兰, 全涌, 顾明. 一类准方形截面超高层建筑的顺风向气动阻尼[J]. 振动与冲击, 2012, 31(22): 84-89.
    CAO Hui-lan, QUAN Yong, GU Ming. Along-wind aerodynamic damping of high-rise buildings with aerodynamically modified square cross-sections [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2012, 31( 22) : 84-90.
[6] 黄剑, 顾明. 超高层建筑风荷载和效应控制的研究及应用进展[J]. 振动与冲击, 2013, 32(10):167-174.
    HUANG Jian, GU Ming．Control of wind loading and effects of super-tall buildings: state of the art [J]．Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2013, 32(10): 167-174．
[7] 顾明, 张正维, 全涌.降低超高层建筑横风向响应气动措施研究进展.同济大学学报:自然科学版, 2013(3): 17-323.
    GU Ming, ZHANG Zheng-wei, QUAN Yong． Aerodynamic measures for mitigation of across-wind response of super tall buildings: state of the art [J]. Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science, 2007, 35(4): 435-449．
[8] 徐明金. 基于FLUENT的小雷诺数下方柱绕流的数值模拟[J]. 水科学与工程技术, 2012(3): 32-34.
    XU Ming-jin. Numerical simulation of flow around a cylinder under small Reynolds number based on FLUENTE [J]. Water Sciences and Engineering Technology, 2012(3): 32-34.
[9] Davenport A G. The Response of Six Building Shapes to Turbulent Wind[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 1971, 269(1199): 385-394.
[10] Gu M, Quan Y. Across-wind loads of typical tall buildings[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2004, 92(13): 1147-1165.
[11] Kwok K C S. Effect of building shape on wind-induced response of tall building[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1988, 28(1-3): 381-390.
[12] 顾明, 叶丰. 典型超高层建筑风荷载频域特性研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2006, 27(1): 30-36.
    GU Ming, YE Feng. Frequence domain characteristics of wind loads on typical super-tall buildings[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2006, 27(1): 30-36.．
[13] Tanaka H, Tamura Y, Ohtake K, et al. Experimental investigation of aerodynamic forces and wind pressures acting on tall buildings with various unconventional configurations[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2012, 107-108(8): 179-191.
[14] Tse K T, Hitchcock P A, Kwok K C S, et al. Economic perspectives of aerodynamic treatments of square tall buildings[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2009, 97(9-10): 455-467.
[15] 杜晓庆, 田新新, 马文勇等. 圆角化对方柱气动性能影响的流场机理[J]. 力学学报, 2018, 50(05): 45-55.
    DU Xiao-qing, TIAN Xin-xin, MA Wen-yong, et al. Effects of rounded corner on aerodynamics of square cylinders and its flow mechanisms[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2018, 50(05): 45-55.
[16] 王新荣, 顾明, 全涌. 圆角处理的断面宽厚比为2:1的二维矩形柱体气动力系数的雷诺数效应研究[J]. 工程力学, 2016, 33(1): 64-71.
    WANG Xin-rong, GU Ming, QUAN Yong. Experimental study of Reynolds number effects on aerodynamic forces for 2:1 rectangular prisms with various rounded corners[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 33(1): 64-71.
[17] 张兆顺，崔桂香，许春晓. 湍流理论与模拟. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2006.
    ZAHNG Zhao-shun, CUI Gui-xiang, XU Chun-xiao. Theory and Modeling of Turbulence[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua university press, 2006.
[18] Lee B E. The effect of turbulence on the surface pressure field of a square prism[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1975, 69(2): 263-282.
[19] Tamura, T. LES analysis on aeroelastic instability of prisms in turbulent flow. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2003, 91(12-15): 1827-1846.
[20] Luo S C, Yazdani M G, Chew Y T, et al. Effects of incidence and afterbody shape on flow past bluff cylinders [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1994, 53(3): 375-399.
[21] Rodi W. Comparison of LES and RANS calculations of the flow around bluff bodies[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1997, 69-71: 55-75.