震损不规则装配框剪结构损伤评估

摘要
图/表
参考文献(26)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (2683 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要为了快速准确地评估地震作用下不规则装配框剪结构的真实状态，为震后结构的损伤程度预测和抗震加固提供技术支持，基于结构材料属性、层间变形、扭转变形以及裂缝等参数，提出了震损不规则装配框剪结构的综合损伤指标(the comprehensive damage index,DI)，建立了DI限值与地震破坏水准之间的关系，最后通过地震模拟振动台试验和数值分析验证了评估理论的可行性和有效性，并与脉动法、规程评估结果进行了比较。结果表明，DI考虑了结构的局部损伤和整体损伤状态，震损不规则装配框剪结构为中等破坏，该评估结果相对层间最大扭转角（严重破坏）、裂缝（轻微破坏）等参数更能真实反映震损结构损伤情况，且与脉动法的结构整体评估结果、规范的层间最大位移角评估结果一致，这一切表明所提评估理论用于精确评估震损不规则装配框剪结构是可行、有效的。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	姜绍飞
	祝豪
	张漳荣
	赵剑
	王耀

关键词 ：装配式结构, 不规则框剪结构, 振动台试验, 综合损伤指标DI

Abstract：In order to quickly and accurately evaluate real state of irregular assembled frame shear wall structure under earthquake, and provide technical support for damage degree prediction and aseismic reinforcement of the structure after earthquake, based on structural material properties, interlayer deformation, torsional deformation and cracks and other parameters, the comprehensive damage index (DI) of the earthquake damaged irregular assembled frame shear wall structure was proposed to establish the relation between DI limit value and seismic damage level. Finally, the feasibility and effectiveness of the evaluation theory were verified with shaking table tests and numerical analysis, and the results were compared with those of the pulsation method and regulation evaluation. The results showed that using DI considers the structure’s local damage and overall damage states; seismic damage of irregular assembled frame shear wall structure is medium damage; compared with maximum interlayer torsion angle (serious damage) and crack (slight damage), the evaluation results can more truly reflect damage situation of seismically damaged structures, and they are consistent with overall evaluation results of the pulsation method and the maximum interlayer torsion angle method in code, so the proposed evaluation theory is feasible and effective for accurately evaluating seismic damage of irregular assembled frame shear wall structures.

Key words： assembled structure irregular frame shear wall structure shaking table test comprehensive damage index (DI)

收稿日期: 2020-01-07 出版日期: 2021-08-15

引用本文:

姜绍飞,祝豪,张漳荣,赵剑,王耀. 震损不规则装配框剪结构损伤评估[J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(15): 165-174.
JIANG Shaofei, ZHU Hao, ZHANG Zhangrong, ZHAO Jian, WANG Yao. Damage assessment of assembled frame shear wall structures with irregular seismic damage. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2021, 40(15): 165-174.

链接本文:

http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V40/I15/165

［1］林向洋, 郑通彦, 文鑫涛. 2017年中国大陆地震灾害损失述评［J］. 防灾科技学院学报, 2018, 20(3): 52-58.
LIN Xiangyang, ZHENG Tongyan, WEN Xintao. Review of earthquake losses in mainland China in 2017［J］. Journal of Institute of Disaster Prevention, 2018, 20(3): 52-58.
［2］黄超, 季静, 韩小雷, 等. 基于性能的既有钢筋混凝土建筑结构抗震评估与加固技术研究［J］. 地震工程与工程振动, 2007, 27(5): 72-79.
HUANG Chao, JI Jing, HAN Xiaolei, et al.Research on performance-based seismic evaluation and strengthening for existing reinforced concrete structures［J］. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,2007, 27(5): 72-79.
［3］叶列平, 孙玉平, 朱珊,等. 日本钢筋混凝土多层结构抗震评估方法［J］. 建筑结构, 2010, 40(8): 110-116.
YE Lieping, SUN Yuping, ZHU Shan, et al. Introduction of evaluation method of the seismic capacity of existing multistory RC buildings in Japan［J］. Building Structure, 2010, 40(8): 110-116.
［4］陈再现, 王凤来, 杨同盖, 等. 底框砌体剪力墙震损房屋损伤评估及抗震加固［J］. 土木工程学报, 2012, 45(增刊1): 61-68.
CHEN Zaixian, WANG Fenglai, YANG Tonggai, et al. Experimental studies on seismic performance of strengthening frame-supported reinforced concrete masonry short-leg shear wall structure damaged by earthquake-Part(Ⅰ) : damage assessment and reinforcement scheme［J］. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2012, 45(Sup1): 61-68.
［5］杜晓菊. RC框架结构基于损伤的抗震性能评估方法研究［D］. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2015.
［6］PARK H S, OH B K. Damage detection of building structures under ambient excitation through the analysis of the relationship between the modal participation ratio and story stiffness［J］. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2018: 122-143.
［7］JBDPA/THE Japan Building Disaster Piievention Association.Standard for seismic evaluation of existing reinforced concrete buildings［S］. Tokyo: Japan Ministry of Construction, 2001.
［8］ENV. 1998-3. Eurocode8:Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance~Part3: Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings［S］.European Committee for Standardization, 2005.
［9］建筑抗震鉴定标准:GB 50023—2009［S］. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2009.
［10］装配式混凝土建筑技术标准:GB/T 51231—2016［S］. 北京:住房和城乡建设部, 2016.
［11］戚永乐. 基于材料应变的RC梁、柱及剪力墙构件抗震性能指标限制研究［D］. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2012.
［12］XIONG Chen, LU Xinzheng, LIN Xuchuan. Damage assessment of shear wall components for RC frame-shear wall buildings using story curvature as engineering demand parameter［J］. Engineering Structures, 2019, 189: 77-88.
［13］林哲. 框架-剪力墙结构基于构件变形指标的抗震性能评估［D］. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2013.
［14］建筑抗震设计规范:GB 50011—2010［S］. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
［15］混凝土结构设计规范:GB 50011—2010［S］.北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
［16］余江滔, 张远淼, 陆洲导, 等. 混凝土框架震损与修复过程动力特性的试验研究［J］. 工程力学, 2013, 30(6):154-161.
YU Jiangtao, ZHANG Yuanmiao, LU Zhoudao, et al. Study on dynamic characteristics of rc frame during damage and rehabilitation process［J］. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(6):154-161.
［17］邓辉阳, 平面不规则结构的抗震性能评估方法［D］. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学大学, 2016.
［18］张坤. 混凝土裂缝的原因与控制［J］. 华东公路, 2017, 6: 121-124.
ZHANG Kun. Causes and control of concrete cracks［J］. East China Highway, 2017, 6: 121-124.
［19］王彬, 林贵满, 宋福春. 超声波法检测混凝土构件裂缝深度研究［J］. 公路交通科技（应用技术版）, 2017, 10: 138-140.
WANG Bin, LIN Guiman, SONG Fuchun. Ultrasonic testing of crack depth of concrete members［J］. Highway Traffic Technology (Application Technology Edition), 2017, 10: 138-140.
［20］岳健广, 钱江. RC框架结构多层次地震损伤演化分析方法［J］. 工程力学, 2015, 32(9): 126-134.
YUE Jianguang, QIAN Jiang. Multi-level seismic damage evolution analysis method for rc frame structures［J］. Engineering Mechanics, 2015, 32(9): 126-134.
［21］中国地震烈度表:GB/T 17742—2008［S］.北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.
［22］HEO Y A, KUNNATH S K. Damage-based seismic performance evaluation of reinforced concrete frames［J］. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 2013, 7(3): 176-182.
［23］MANDER J B, PRIESTLEY M J N, PARK R. Observed stressstrain behavior of confined concrete［J］. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1988, 114(8): 1827-1849.
［24］BROWN J, KUNNATH S K. Low-cycle fatigue behavior of longitudinal reinforcement in reinforced concrete bridge columns ［R］. Buffalo：Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, 2000．
［25］施卫星, 汪洋, 刘成清.基于频率测量的高层建筑地震作用损伤分析［J］. 西南交通大学学报, 2007, 42(4): 389-394.
SHI Weixing, WANG Yang, LIU Chengqing. Damage analysis of high-rise building under seismic load based on frequency measurement［J］. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007, 42(4): 389-394.
［26］刘成清, 施卫星, 赵世春. 基于试验测量的高层结构整体抗震损伤评估［J］. 建筑科学, 2012, 28(7): 8-11.
LIU Chengqing, SHI Weixing, ZHAO Shichun. Seismic damage assessment of high-rise structures based on experimental measurements［J］. Building Science, 2012,28(7): 8-11.