Numerical analysis of TPIMS for reducing wind-induced vibration of high-rise chimney
YANG Han1, LIU Yangzhao1, DAI Kaoshan1,2,3, DING Zhibin1, YIN Yexian4
1.Department of Civil Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China;
2.MOE Key Laboratory of Deep Underground Science and Engineering, Chengdu 610065, China;
3.Failure Mechanics & Engineering Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610065, China;
4.SEPCOIII Electric Power Construction Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266100, China
摘要以某高耸烟囱为工程背景，提出了一种预测三维烟囱涡振响应的新方法，通过该方法可有效避免复杂的公式推导与数值计算；通过连续随机离散流技术（consistent discrete random inflow generation，CDRFG）模拟紊流风场，建立两种减振系统的有限元模型，计算对比惯容减振系统（Tuned parallel inerter mass system, TPIMS）与调谐质量阻尼器（tuned mass damper，TMD）的风致振动减振效率。结果表明：新的预测方法能够较为准确地预测出三维烟囱的涡振响应；基于相同质量比，惯容减振系统相比TMD有更高的减振效率，但其存在质点行程过大的问题，需要在具体工程设计中加以关注。
Abstract：Taking a high-rise chimney as an example, the efficiency of the tuned parallel inerter mass system (TPIMS) and TMD for chimney vibration depression under wind loads was compared. Vortex-induced responses of the chimney under different wind speeds were obtained by the iteration method, and buffeting responses under strong winds were realized by the consistent discrete random flow generation (CDRFG) method. The finite element models of two control systems were constructed, in which the inerter is simulated by the equivalent effect method. Based on the results, the efficiency of two systems were calculated and compared. Under the condition of the same mass ratio, TPIMS has a better damping efficiency than tuned mass damper（TMD）. However, there is a problem of excessive mass displacement for TPIMS, which should be considered in actual engineering projects.
杨涵1，刘仰昭1，戴靠山1,2,3，丁志斌1，尹业先4. 高耸烟囱风致振动的TPIMS减振数值分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(9): 290-298.
YANG Han1, LIU Yangzhao1, DAI Kaoshan1,2,3, DING Zhibin1, YIN Yexian4. Numerical analysis of TPIMS for reducing wind-induced vibration of high-rise chimney. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2022, 41(9): 290-298.
[1] 石启印. 高耸机场塔台结构风洞及振动台试验研究与应用[D]. 东南大学, 2005.
SHI Qiyin. Experimental Research and Application of Wind Tunnel and Shaking Table for High-rise Aero-tower Structure[D]. Southeast University, 2005.
[2] 陈政清. 桥梁风工程[M]. 北京:人民交通出版社, 2005.
CHEN Zhengqing. Bridge Wind Engineering[M]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2005.
[3] TAMURA Y, AMANO A. Mathematical Model for Vortex—Induced Oscillations of Continuous Systems with Circular Cross Section[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 1983, 14:431-442.
[4] 梁枢果，周颖，王磊，等. 基于连续气弹模型的超高烟囱风致响应风洞试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2019, 38(10):149-155.
LIANG Shuguo, ZHOU Ying, WANG Lei, et al. Wind-induced responses of a high chimney by the wind tunnel tests with a continuous aero-elastic model[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2019, 38(10):149-155.
[5] DAI Kaoshan, BERGOT A, LIANG Chao, et al. Environmental issues associated with wind energy – A review[J]. Renewable Energy, 2015, 75:911-921.
[6] 丁幼亮，耿方方，葛文浩，等. 多塔斜拉桥风致抖振响应的粘滞阻尼器控制研究[J].工程力学, 2015, 32(04):130-137.
DING Youliang, GENG Fangfang, GE Wenhao, et al. Control of Wind-Induced Buffeting Responses of a Multi-tower Cable-stayed Bridge Using Viscous Dampers [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2015, 32(04):130-137.
[7] 周亚栋，孙延国，李明. 大跨度斜拉桥桥塔自立状态抗风性能试验研究[J]. 桥梁建设, 2020, 50(03):52-57.
ZHOU Yadong, SUN Yanguo, LI Ming. Experimental Research on Wind Resistant Performance of Free-Standing Pylon of Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridge [J]. Bridge Construction, 2020, 50(03):52-57.
[8] 邓洪洲，徐海江，马星. 桅杆结构风振系数研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(22):48-53.
DENG Hongzhou, XU Haijiang, MA Xing. Wind-vibration coefficient of guyed masts[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(22):48-53.
[9] 陈鑫，李爱群，张志强，等. 自立式高耸结构悬吊式TMD减振动力试验与分析[J]. 振动工程学报, 2016, 29(02):193-200.
CHEN Xin, LI Aiqun, ZHANG Zhiqiang, et al. Dynamic Experiment and Analysis of Vibration Control of Suspended TMD for Self-supporting High-rise Structure[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2016, 29(02):193-200.
[10] DEN HARTOG J P. Mechanical vibrations[M]. New York: Courier Corporation, 1985.
[11] WARBURTON G B. Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1982, 10(3): 381-401.
[12] 陈鑫，李爱群，王泳，等.自立式高耸结构风振控制方法研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(07):149-155.
CHEN Xin, LI Aiqun, WANG Yong, et al. Investigation on techniques for wind-induced vibration control of self-standing high-rise structures[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 34(07):149-155.
[13] ZHANG Ruifu, ZHAO Zhipeng, DAI Kaoshan. Seismic response mitigation of a wind turbine tower using a tuned parallel inerter mass system[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 180:29-39.
[14] 张瑞甫，曹嫣如，潘超. 惯容减震(振)系统及其研究进展[J]. 工程力学, 2019, 36(10):8-27.
ZHANG Ruifu, CAO Yanru, PAN Chao. Inerter System and its State-of-the-Art[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(10):8-27.
[15] 赵志鹏，张瑞甫，陈清军，等. 基于减震比设计方法的惯容减震结构分析[J]. 工程力学, 2019, 36(S1):125-130.
ZHAO Zhipeng, ZHANG Ruifu, CHEN Qingjun, et al. Analysis of Structures with Inerter Systems Based on the Response Mitigation Ratio Design Method [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(S1):125-130.
[16] ABOSHOSHA H, ELSHAER A, BITSUAMLAK G T, et al. Consistent inflow turbulence generator for LES evaluation of wind-induced responses for tall buildings[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 2015, 142:198-216.
[17] 马文勇，汪冠亚，袁欣欣，等. 圆柱结构涡激共振耦合效应及其抗风设计参数[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(05):74-83.
MA Wenyong, WANG Guanya, YUAN Xinxin, et al. Coupling Effect of Vortex Induced Vibration on Circular Cylinder and Its Parameters on Wind Resistance Design[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018, 31(05):74-83.
[18] LIU Y Z, MA C M, LI Q S, et al. A new modeling approach for transversely oscillating square-section cylinders[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2018, 81: 492-513.
[19] FENG C C. The measurement of vortex induced effects in flow past stationary and oscillating circular and d-section cylinders[D]. University of British Columbia, 1968.
[20] STAUBLI T. Calculation of the Vibration of an Elastically Mounted Cylinder Using Experimental Data from Forced Oscillation[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1983, 105:225-229.
[21] ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers). Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures[J]. ASCE standard ASCE/SEI 7–16 (in preparation). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers., 2016.
