Dynamic behaviors of double-column RC bridge under barge impact
CHEN Tianli1,WU Hao1,FANG Qin2
1.College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
2.College of National Defense Engineering, Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing 210007, China
Abstract:During the service life, bridges are potentially subjected to collisions by vessels. To study the dynamic responses and damage patterns of the prototype double-column RC bridge under barge impact, the scaling model test of bridge substructure and numerical simulation were conducted. First, the lateral impact test of 1/5 scaled barge bow and rigid impactor on the double-column RC bridge pier (DCBP) specimens was carried out, and the impact force-time histories, crush depth of barge bow, as well as the dynamic behaviors of DCBP specimens were obtained. In addition, based on the finite element (FE) program LS-DYNA, the numerical simulation of the test was conducted. By comparing the FE analyses results with the experimental data, the applicability of the FE analyses approach, material models and corresponding parameters was validated. Then, the refined and simplified FE models of prototype barge-bridge collision were established, respectively. The reliability of simplified FE models using fiber beam element to characterize the pile was verified, and the impact process during barge-bridge collision, the effects of barge mass, impact velocity and impact angle on the dynamic behaviors of the prototype bridge were discussed. It derives that, under the identical impact energy, the impact velocity has a great influence on the permanent crush depth of barge bow; the impact angle has a great effect on the impact duration and the dynamic behaviors of the bridge, and amplifies the overall collapse risk of the bridge. This work can provide a reference for the impact-resistant evaluation and design of the prototype double-column RC bridge against barge impact.
[1] 刘占辉, 呼瑞杰, 姚昌荣, 等. 桥梁撞击问题2019年度研究进展[J]. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2020, 42(5): 235-246.
Liu Z H, Hu R J, Yao C R, et al. State-of-the-art review of bridge impact research in 2019[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2020, 42(5): 235-246.
[2] 刘占辉, 卢治谋, 张锐, 等. 桥梁撞击问题2020年度研究进展[J]. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2021, 43: 242-251.
Liu Z H, Lu Z M, Zhang R, et al. State-of-the-art review of bridge impact research in 2020[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2021, 43: 242-251.
[3] Knott M A. Vessel collision design codes and experience in the United States[M]. Ship collision analysis, Routledge, 2017.
[4] AASHTO, 2009. Guide Specifications and Commentary for Vessel Collision Design of Highway Bridges [S].
[5] Goble G, Schulz J, Commander B. Lock and Dam #26 field test report for the Army Corps of Engineers [R], Bridge Diagnostics Inc., Boulder (CO), 1990.
[6] Consolazio G R, Cook R A, Lehr G B. Barge impact testing of the St. George Island Causeway Bridge, Phase I: feasibility study[R]. Gainesville, Florida: University of Florida, 2002.
[7] Consolazio G R, Cook R A, Biggs A E, et al. Barge impact testing of the St. George Island Causeway Bridge, Phase II: design of instrumentation systems[R]. Gainesville, Florida: University of Florida, 2003.
[8] Consolazio G R, Cook R A, Mcvay M C. Barge impact testing of the St. George Island Causeway Bridge-phase III: physical testing and data interpretation, structures[R]. Gainesville, Florida: University of Florida, 2006.
[9] Meir-Dornberg K E. Ship collisions, safety zones, and loading assumptions for structures in inland waterways[J]. VDI-Berichte, 1983, 496(1): 1-9.
[10] Kantrales G C, Consolazio G R, Wagner D, et al. Experimental and analytical study of high-level barge deformation for barge-bridge collision design[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2015, 21(2): 04015039.
[11] Getter D J, Kantrales G C, Consolazio G R, et al. Strain rate sensitive steel constitutive models for finite element analysis of vessel-structure impacts[J]. Marine Structures, 2015, 44: 171-202.
[12] 刘飞. 钢筋混凝土桥墩抗车辆撞击机理研究[D]. 湖南: 湖南大学, 2017.
Liu F. The mechanism research of reinforced concrete piers subjected to vehicle collisions[D]. Hunan: Hunan University, 2017.
[13] Wan Y L, Zhu L, Fang H, et al. Experimental testing and numerical simulations of ship impact on axially loaded reinforced concrete piers[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2019, 125: 246-262.
[14] Chen Z Y, Fang H, Zhu L, et al. Experimental tests and numerical simulations of circular reinforced concrete piers under ship impact[J]. Advances in Bridge Engineering, 2020, 1(1): 1-25.
[15] 王君杰, 陈传景, 宋彦臣, 等. 驳船斜撞刚性墙动力时程概率模型[J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(15): 23-28.
Wang J J, Chen C J, Song Y C, et al. Probabilistic model for dynamic time history of a barge-rigid wall oblique collision[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(15): 23-28.
[16] 宋彦臣, 王君杰, 尹海蛟, 等. 轮船-桥墩碰撞简化荷载模型[J]. 振动与冲击, 2019, 38(5): 60-70.
Song Y C, Wang J J, Yin J H, et al. Simplified impact load model for ship-bridge collisions[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2019, 38(5): 60-70.
[17] Kishi N, Mikami H, Matsuoka K G, et al. Impact behavior of shear-failure-type RC beams without shear rebar[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2002, 27(9): 955-968.
[18] Bambach M R, Jama H, Zhao X L, et al. Hollow and concrete filled steel hollow sections under transverse impact loads[J]. Engineering Structures, 2008, 30(10): 2859-2870.
[19] Fujikake K, Li B, Soeun S, Impact response of reinforced concrete beam and its analytical evaluation[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2009, 135(8): 938-950.
[20] Sha Y Y, Hao H. Laboratory tests and numerical simulations of barge impact on circular reinforced concrete piers[J]. Engineering Structures, 2013, 46: 593-605.
[21] Sha Y Y, Hao H. Laboratory tests and numerical simulations of CFRP strengthened RC pier subjected to barge impact load[J]. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 2015, 15(2): 1450037.
[22] Demartino C, Wu J G, Xiao Y. Response of shear-deficient reinforced circular RC columns under lateral impact loading[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2017, 109: 196-213.
[23] Xu J J, Demartino C, Shan B, et al. Experimental investigation on performance of cantilever CFRP-wrapped circular RC columns under lateral low-velocity impact[J]. Composite Structures, 2020, 242: 112143.
[24] LS-DYNA 971. Livermore software technology corporation. Livermore (C.A., U.S. A). 2015.
[25] Yuan P. Modeling, simulation and analysis of multi-barge flotillas impacting bridge piers[D]. Kentucky: University of Kentucky, 2005.
[26] Whitney M W, Harik I E. Analysis and design of bridges susceptible to barge impact[R]. Kentucky Transportation Center, Kentucky: University of Kentucky, 1997.
[27] Chen T L, Wu H, Fang Q. Impact force models for bridge under barge collisions[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 259: 111856.
[28] Consolazio G R, Getter D J, Kantrales G C. Validation and implementation of bridge design specifications for barge impact loading[R]. Gainesville, Florida: University of Florida, 2014.
[29] Abedini M, Zhang C W. Performance assessment of concrete and steel material models in LS-DYNA for enhanced numerical simulation, a state of the art review[J]. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2021, 28: 2921-2942.
[30] Sha Y Y, Hao H. Nonlinear finite element analysis of barge collision with a single bridge pier[J]. Engineering Structures, 2012, 41: 63-76.
[31] Gholipour G, Zhang C W, Mousavi A A. Nonlinear numerical analysis and progressive damage assessment of a cable-stayed bridge pier subjected to ship collision[J]. Marine Structures, 2020, 69: 102662.
[32] Fan W, Yuan W C, Chen B S. Steel fender limitations and improvements for bridge protection in ship collisions[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2015, 20(12): 06015004.
[33] Shen D J, Sun W B, Fan W, et al. Behavior and analysis of simply supported bridges under vessel side collisions: implications from collapse of the Taiyangbu Bridge[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2022, 27(9): 04022076.