基于振动台试验的鱼线固定梅瓶文物响应规律性研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献(33)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1879 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要为了探索鱼线固定梅瓶文物在实际博物馆的地震响应以及抗震效果，首先选取了典型梅瓶文物，并在三层钢筋混凝土框架结构中开展了24种地震工况的振动台试验，然后建立了上述试验所用梅瓶文物的有限元模型，验证了有限元模型的准确性，最后采用增量动力分析法分析了该文物在两种常见直径鱼线保护措施下的运动响应。结果表明：鱼线固定梅瓶文物在地震作用下会产生滑移、摇摆、倾覆以及鱼线断裂等现象；不同楼层下的文物响应差别较大，尤其在大震作用下，高楼层的鱼线固定梅瓶文物易发生倾覆和鱼线断裂破坏，要重视高楼层文物的震前保护措施；在较强的地震作用下，仅依靠增大鱼线直径有时对控制文物的倾覆情况起不到关键性决定作用，需要进一步采取其它措施对文物进行保护。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	杨维国1
	高雅巍1
	王萌1
	刘佩1
	葛家琪2
	邹晓光1

关键词 ：鱼线固定梅瓶文物, 振动台试验, 有限元模型, 运动响应, 增量动力分析

Abstract：In order to explore the seismic response and seismic effect of the Plum vase cultural relics fixed by fishing line in the actual museum, the typical Plum vase cultural relics were first selected to carry out shaking table test of three-layer reinforced concrete frame structure under 24 kinds of seismic excitation. Then the finite element model of Plum vase cultural relics used in the above test was established, and the accuracy of the finite element model was verified. Finally, incremental dynamic analysis was used to analyze the motion response of the relic under two common fishing line diameter protection measures. The results show that the cultural relics fixed by fishing line may slip, sway, overturn and break under the action of earthquake. The response of cultural relics varies greatly under different floors. Especially under the action of large earthquakes, the cultural relics fixed by fishing line in the upper floors are prone to capsize and breakage of fishing line. Therefore, attention should be paid to the pre-earthquake protection measures of the cultural relics in the upper floors. Under the action of strong earthquake, only increasing the diameter of fishing line can not play a key role in controlling the overturning of cultural relics, so it is necessary to take other measures to protect cultural relics.

Key words： fish line fixed artifact shaking table test floor magnification factor incremental dynamic analysis ABAQUS

收稿日期: 2023-03-20 出版日期: 2024-02-28

引用本文:

杨维国1，高雅巍1，王萌1，刘佩1，葛家琪2，邹晓光1. 基于振动台试验的鱼线固定梅瓶文物响应规律性研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2024, 43(4): 250-260.
YANG Weiguo1, GAO Yawei1, WANG Meng1, LIU Pei1, GE Jiaqi2, ZOU Xiaoguang1. A study on response regularity of fishing line fixed plum vase based on a shaking table test . JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2024, 43(4): 250-260.

链接本文:

http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/Y2024/V43/I4/250

[1] 郭恩栋, 崔恩文, 刘智, 等. 基于谱密度强度指标的高铁地震报警阈值计算方法[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2015, 36(02):125–129. Guo Endong, Cui Enwen, Liu Zhi, et al. High-speed railway earthquake alarm threshold calculation method based on spectral density intensity index [J]. China Railway Science, 2015, 36(02):125–129. [2] 利明东. 某复杂高层建筑结构基于性能的抗震设计与分析[D]. 西安建筑科技大学, 2021. Li Mingdong. Performance Based Seismic Design and Analysis of a Complex high-rise Building structure [D]. Xi 'an University of Architecture and Technology, 2021. [3] 巩梦婷, 韦荃, 冯萍莉, 等. 5.12汶川地震中四川可移动梅瓶文物及其建筑受损情况调查[J]. 梅瓶文物保护与考古科学, 2016, 28(04): 40–47. Gong Mengting, Wei Quan, Feng Pingli, et al. Investigation on the damage of movable cultural relics and buildings in Sichuan during the 5.12 Wenchuan Earthquake [J]. Sciences of conservation and archaeology, 2016, 28(04): 40–47. [4] 周乾, 闫维明, 周锡元, 等. 我国博物馆陈列梅瓶文物防震技术现状研究[J]. 灾害学, 2010, 25(S1): 201–206. Zhou Qian, Yan Weiming, Zhou Xiyuan, et al. Research on the current situation of antiseismic technology of plum vase relics displayed in Chinese museums [J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2010, 25(S1): 201–206. [5] 博物馆梅瓶文物防震关键技术创新与应用[N]. 中国梅瓶文物报, 2016-12-09(010). Innovation and application of key technology for earthquake protection of museum cultural relics [N]. China Cultural Relics News, 2016-12-09(010). [6] 葛家琪, 马伯涛. 中国博物馆收藏梅瓶文物一体化防震技术研究进展[J]. 中国博物馆, 2021, (01):10–16+126. Ge JIAqi, Ma Botao. Research progress of integrated earthquake protection technology for Cultural relics collected by Chinese Museums [J]. Museum of China, 2021, (01):10–16+126. [7] 马伯涛, 宋毛毛, 吴来明, 等.《馆藏梅瓶文物防震规范》关键技术—防震安全设计研究[J]. 梅瓶文物保护与考古科学, 2016, 28(02): 1–6. Ma Botao, SONG Maomao, WU Laiming, et al. Research on the key technology of Earthquake Protection Code for Cultural Relics -- Safety design of Earthquake protection [J]. Sciences of conservation and archaeology, 2016, 28(02): 1–6. [8] 周乾, 闫维明, 纪金豹. 传统方法加固馆藏浮放梅瓶文物抗震性能试验[J]. 梅瓶文物保护与考古科学, 2015, 27(02): 63–72. Zhou Qian, Yan Weiming, Ji Jinbao. Seismic performance test of traditional methods to reinforce floating relics in collections [J]. Heritage Conservation and Archaeological Science, 2015, 27(02): 63–72. [9] 周乾, 闫维明, 纪金豹. 馆藏浮放梅瓶文物隔震装置的开发与应用[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2013, 33(02): 147–154. Zhou Qian, Yan Weiming, Ji Jinbao. Development and application of seismic isolation devices for floating relics in collections[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2013, 33(02): 147–154. [10] 于建军. 博物馆结构—梅瓶文物陈列系统的防震性能研究[D]. 西安建筑科技大学, 2017. Yu JJ. Research on the seismic performance of museum structure-relics display system [D]. Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, 2017. [11] 周乾, 闫维明, 纪金豹. 地震作用下浮放梅瓶文物滑移及摇晃响应仿真[J]. 华北地震科学, 2016, 34(01): 13–20. Zhou Qian,Yan Weiming, Ji Jinbao. Simulation of slip and shaking response of floating and placed artifacts under earthquake action [J]. North China Earthquake Science, 2016, 34(01): 13–20. [12] 吴伟. 浮放设备地震反应数值模拟研究[D]. 中国地震局工程力学研究所, 2006. Wu W. Numerical simulation study of seismic response of floating discharge equipment [D]. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, 2006. [13] Chaudhuri S R., Hutchinson T C.. Characterizing frictional behavior for use in predicting the seismic response of unattached equipment [J]. Soil Dynamics & Earthquake Engineering, 2005, 25(7-10): 591–604. [14] Konstantinidis D., Makris N.. Experimental and analytical studies on the response of freestanding laboratory equipment to earthquake shaking [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2010, 38(6): 827–848 [15] 钮泽蓁. 陈列梅瓶文物抗震措施实验研究[J]. 工程抗震, 1992, (02): 28–31. Niu Zecco. Experimental study on seismic measures for exhibited cultural relics [J]. Engineering earthquake resistance, 1992, (02): 28–31. [16] 周乾, 闫维明, 纪金豹. 鱼线加固馆藏浮放梅瓶文物振动台试验[J]. 土木工程与管理学报, 2011, 28(03): 395–400. Zhou Qian, Yan Weiming, Ji Jinbao. Shaking table test of fish line reinforced curated floating relics [J]. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2011, 28(03): 395–400. [17] 王萌, 闫一, 傅萌, 等. 栓绑法固定馆藏梅瓶文物的抗震有效性振动台试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2022, 39(02): 208–221. Wang M, Yan Y, Fu M, et al. Experimental study on seismic effectiveness of shaking table for fixing cultural relics in collections by bolting method [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2022, 39(02): 208–221. [18] 王萌, 闫一, 葛家琪, 等. 鱼线栓绑法对馆藏文物的抗震固定效果及优化设计研究[J]. 建筑结构学报. 2022, 06(01): 1–14. Wang Meng, Yan Yi, Ge Jiaqi, et al. Research on seismic fixing effect and optimal design of cultural relics collected by fishing line tying method [J]. Journal of Building Structures. 2022, 06(01):1–14. [19] Bakhtiary E., Gardoni P.. Probabilistic seismic demand model and fragility estimates for rocking symmetric blocks [J]. Engineering Structures, 2016, 114(5): 25–34. [20] 陆伟东, 吴晓飞, 刘伟庆. 基础隔震和非隔震结构模型振动台试验对比研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2012, 42(04): 34–37. Lu W.D., Wu X.F., Liu W.Q.. Comparative study of shaking table test on model of seismically isolated and non-seismically isolated structure of foundation [J]. Building Structure, 2012, 42(04): 34–37. [21] GB50011‐2010, 建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010. GB 50011-2010, Code for seismic Design of buildings [S]. China Architecture and Building Press, Beijing, 2010. [22] GB 50010-2010, 混凝土结构设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010. GB 50010-2010, Code for Design of Concrete Structures [S]. China Construction Industry Press, Beijing, 2010. [23] Lopez Garcia D, Soong T T. Sliding fragility of block‐type non‐structural components. Part 2: Restrained components[J]. Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics, 2003, 32(1): 131–149. [24] Liu P., Yang W.. Seismic fragility analysis of sliding artifacts in nonlinear artifact-showcase-museum systems [J]. Structural Engineering & Mechanics, 2021, 78(3): 333–350. [25] 李连洲. 对含有Al2O3和Y2O3的氮化硅结构陶瓷材料弹性性能的研究[J]. 耐火与石灰, 2019, 44(05): 34–35. Li Lianzhou. Study on the elastic properties of silicon nitride structural ceramic materials containing Al2O3 and Y2O3 [J]. Refractory and Lime, 2019, 44(05): 34–35. [26] 孙锐. 典型城市混凝土连续梁桥地震易损性分析[D]. 重庆交通大学, 2019. Sun Rui. Analysis of seismic vulnerability of typical urban concrete continuous girder bridges [D]. Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2019. [27] 杨先霖. 钢筋混凝土框架–剪力墙结构的主余震易损性分析[D]. 哈尔滨工业大学, 2019. Yang Xianlin. Analysis of main aftershock vulnerability of reinforced concrete frame–shearwm wall structures [D]. Harbin Institute of Technology, 2019. [28] 杨波, 杨晓飞, 马伯涛, 等.处于地震带的博物馆梅瓶文物预防性保护研究与实践——以成都博物馆为例[J]. 东南文化, 2017(S1): 27–33. Yang Bo, Yang Xiaofei, Ma Botao, at al. Research and practice on preventive conservation of museum relics in earthquake zones--Chengdu Museum as an example [J]. Southeast Culture, 2017, (S1):27–33. [29] GB 50011-2010, 建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 中国建筑工业出版社，2010. GB 50011-2010, Code for seismic design of buildings [S]. China Construction Industry Press, 2010. [30] Zou X, Yang W, Liu P, et al. Shaking table tests and numerical study of a sliding isolation bearing for the seismic protection of museum artifacts [J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 65: 105725. [31] 靳聪聪, 迟世春, 聂章博. 考虑地震波随机性及水位影响的高土石坝易损性研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2019, 38(06):67–74+107. Jin Congcong, Chi Shichun, Nie Zhangbo. Study on the vulnerability of high earth-rock dam considering the randomness of seismic wave and the influence of water level [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2019, 38(06):67–74+107. [32] 杨维国, 葛家琪, 张家铭, 等. 大高宽比浮放馆藏文物运动状态影响因素研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(24):134–141. Yang Weiguo, Ge Jiaqi, Zhang Jiaming, et al. Study on factors influencing the motion state of floating cultural relics with high aspect ratio [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41(24):134–141. [33] 杨维国, 葛家琪, 李斌斌, 等. 土体-博物馆-展柜-文物全系统中地震传递规律研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2023, 42(04):247–255. Yang Weiguo, Ge Jiaqi, Li Binbin, et al. Study on seismic transmission law in the whole system of soil-museum structure-showcase-museum collection [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2023, 42(04):247–255.