底部加强矩形钢管混凝土柱抗震性能优化分析
惠 存1,3,曹万林2,王元清3,王 斌4
1. 清华大学 土木工程系,北京 100084;
2. 北京工业大学 建筑工程学院,北京 100124;
3. 江河创建集团股份有限公司,北京 101300
Numerical analysis for the seismic performance of bottom strengthened retangular concrete filled steel tube columns
HUI Cun1,3,CAO Wan-lin2,WANG Yuan-qing3,WANG Bin4
1. Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2. College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China;
3. Jangho Group Company Limited, Beijing 101300, China
摘要 为优化分析矩形截面钢管混凝土柱抗震性能影响参数,提出在底部外侧贴焊钢板的加强矩形钢管混凝土柱。在试验基础上用ABAQUS软件对轴压比、混凝土强度等级、底部加强钢板高度及厚度对试件影响进行数值分析,并与试验对比。结果表明,随轴压比增大试件承载力、延性逐步下降;随混凝土强度等级提高试件承载力提高,但下降段变陡,延性降低;随加强钢板高度增加试件承载力稳步增大,耗能能力提高,延性近似相等;随加强钢板厚度增加承载力提高幅度有限。在满足构造要求下,底部加强矩形截面钢管混凝土柱结构综合抗震耗能良好,可用于高层建筑结构抗震设计。
关键词 :
钢管混凝土 ,
底部加强 ,
矩形截面 ,
抗震性能 ,
优化分析
Abstract :In order to optimize the influencing parameters of seismic performance about rectangular concrete filled steel tube (CFST) column, a bottom strengthened rectangular CFST column whose bottom zone was welded with enhancing steel plates, was proposed. Based on the experimental results, the factors affecting the load-bearing capacity were analyzed. By means of the finite element analysis software ABAQUS, the analysis to simulate numerically the specimens with different compression ratio, different strength grade of concrete, different height and thickness of the bottom strengthened steel plate were carried out. The analytical results were compared with the experimental results. The study shows: when the axial compression ratio increases, the load-bearing capacity and the ductility decrease; when the strength grade of concrete increases, the bearing capacity also increases, but the decline steepens and the ductility decreases; when the height of the strengthened plate increases, the load-bearing capacity of specimens increases steadily, the energy dissipation capacity increases, and the ductility is approximately equal to each other; when the thickness of the strengthened plate increases, the load-bearing capacity improves only a little. The rectangular concrete filled steel tube column with bottom enhancing plates shows better seismic behavior and higher energy dissipation capacity if suitable constructional requirements are satisfied. Such structural configuration can be adopted in design of high-rise buildings.
Key words :
concrete filled steel tube
strengthened bottom
rectangular section
seismic performance
optimized analysis
收稿日期: 2014-10-23
出版日期: 2016-01-15
引用本文:
惠 存1,3,曹万林2,王元清3,王 斌4. 底部加强矩形钢管混凝土柱抗震性能优化分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(2): 141-145.
HUI Cun1,3,CAO Wan-lin2,WANG Yuan-qing3,WANG Bin4. Numerical analysis for the seismic performance of bottom strengthened retangular concrete filled steel tube columns. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2016, 35(2): 141-145.
链接本文:
http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/Y2016/V35/I2/141
[1] 惠存,曹万林,董宏英,等. 底部加强型矩形钢管混凝土柱抗震性能试验与分析[J]. 世界地震工程,2012, 28(4): 161-169.
HUI Cun, CAO Wan-lin, DONG Hong-ying, et al. Study on seismic behavior of bottom strengthened rectangular concrete filled steel tube columns[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 28(4): 161-169.
[2] 沈祖炎,黄奎生. 矩形钢管混凝土轴心受力构件的设计方法[J]. 建筑结构, 2005, 35(1): 3-4.
SHEN Zu-yan,HUANG Kui-sheng. Design method of axially loaded members of concrete-filled rectangular steel tube[J]. Building Structure, 2005, 35(1): 3-4.
[3] Han Lin-hai, Ren Qing-xin, Li Wei. Tests on inclined, tapered and STS concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) stub columns [J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2010, 66(10): 1186-1195.
[4] 杨有福, 韩林海. 矩形钢管混凝土构件抗弯力学性能的试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2001, 21(3): 41-48.
YANG You-fu, HAN Lin-hai. Experimental studies on behavior of eoneret-filled RHS members subjeeted to Pure bending[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2001, 21(3): 41-48.
[5] 韩林海, 杨有福, 刘威. 长期荷载作用对矩形钢管混凝土轴心受压柱力学性能的影响研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2004, 37(3): 12-18.
HAN Lin-hai, YANG You-fu, LIU Wei. The behavior of concrete-filled steel tubular columns with rectangular section under of long-term loading[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2004, 37(3): 12-18.
[6] 周绪红, 刘界鹏, 张素梅. 方钢管约束钢筋高强混凝土超短柱抗震性能试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2010, 43(8): 1-10.
ZHOU Xu-hong, LIU Jie-peng, ZHANG Su-mei. Seismic behavior of ultra short columns of square tubed high strength reinforced concrete[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2010, 43(8): 1-10.
[7] 马忠吉,乔雷涛,王伟,等. 矩形钢管约束钢筋混凝土超短柱滞回性能试验[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2011, 43(8): 21-25.
MA Zhong-ji, QIAO Lei-tao, WANG Wei. Experiment on the rectangular tubed RC ultra short columns under axial compression and lateral cyclic load[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2011, 43(8): 21-25.
[8] 任庆新,郭俊峰,贾连光,等. 圆、矩形钢管混凝土短斜柱力学性能试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2012, 29(5): 86-92.
REN Qing-xin, GUO Jun-feng, JIA Lian-guang, et al. Tests on inclined concrete-filled steel tubular stub columns with circular and rectangular sections[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2012, 29(5): 86-92.
[9] Yu Z W, Ding F X, Cai C S. Experimental behavior of circular concrete-filled steel tube stub columns[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2007, 63(2): 165-174.
[10] 吕西林, 陆伟东. 反复荷载作用下方钢管混凝土柱的抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2000, 21(2): 2-11.
Lü Xi-lin, LU Wei-dong. Seismic behavior of conerete-filled reetangular steel tubular columns under cyclic loading[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2000, 21(2): 2-11.
[11] 惠存,曹万林,董宏英,等. 底部加强型工字形钢管混凝土柱抗震性能研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2013, 33(1): 97-105.
HUI Cun, CAO Wan-lin, DONG Hong-ying, et al. Study on seismic behavior of bottom strengthened I-section concrete filled steel tube columns[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2013, 33(1): 97-105.
[12] 曹万林,惠存,董宏英,等. 工字形截面内藏双钢板混凝土组合柱抗震试验[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2014, 23(2): 85-93.
CAO Wan-lin, HUI Cun, DONG Hong-ying, et al. Experimental study on seismic behavior of I-section steel reinforced concrete columns with concealed double steel plates[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2014, 23(2): 85-93.
[13] Aval S B B, Saadeghvaziri M A, Golafshani A A. Comprehensive composite inelastic fiber element for cyclic analysis of concrete-filled steel tube columns[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 2002, 128(4): 428-437.
[14] 程晓东, 叶贵如, 程莉莎, 等. 方钢管混凝土偏压柱非线性屈曲承载力的有限元分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2003, 36(12): 31-38.
CHENG Xiao-dong, YE Gui-ru, CHENG Li-sha, et al. Finite element analysis of nonlinear buckling load bearing capacity of concrete-filled square steel tubular column under eccentric load[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2003, 36(12): 31-38.
[15] 蔡健, 何振强. 带约束拉杆方形钢管混凝土的本构关系[J]. 工程力学, 2006, 23(10): 145-150.
CAI Jian, HE Zhen-qiang. Constitutive relationship of square CFT with binding bars[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2006, 23(10): 145-150.
[16] 李黎明, 姜忻良, 陈志华,等. 矩形钢管混凝土抗弯性能数值分析与简化计算[J]. 天津大学学报, 2007, 40(8): 990-994.
LI Li-ming, JIANG Xin-liang, CHEN Zhi-hua, et al. Numerical analysis of CFRT under bending load and its simplified calculating method[J]. Journal of Tianjin University, 2007, 40(8): 990-994.
[17] 韩林海. 钢管混凝土结构: 理论与实践[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004.
[18] 过镇海, 时旭东. 钢筋混凝土原理和分析[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2003.
[1]
鲁亮1,? 江乐1 李鸿2 吕西林1. 柱端铰型受控摇摆式钢筋混凝土框架抗震性能的振动台试验研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(4): 31-.
[2]
曾磊,吴园园,许成祥,崔振坤,龚倩倩. 钢骨混凝土异形柱-钢梁节点抗震性能试验研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(4): 36-.
[3]
房忠洁,周叮,王佳栋,刘伟庆. 带隔板的矩形截面渡槽内液体的晃动特性 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(3): 169-175.
[4]
闫 磊1,李青宁1,程麦理1,尹俊红1,孙建鹏1. 曲线桥梁漂浮抗震体系地震模拟振动台试验及有限元分析 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(2): 1-6.
[5]
焦安亮1,2,李正良1. 劲性装配式框架核心筒结构抗震性能试验研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(2): 31-38.
[6]
代慧娟1,白国良2,王 博2,张淑云1,董叶辉2. 带斜撑型直接空冷钢-混凝土竖向混合结构非线性地震响应分析 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(7): 141-148.
[7]
王文达,魏国强. 基于纤维模型的型钢混凝土组合剪力墙滞回性能分析 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(6): 30-35.
[8]
谢启芳;杜 彬;李 双;向 伟;郑培君;. 残损古建筑木结构燕尾榫节点抗震性能试验研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(4): 165-170.
[9]
李郑发1,2,3,曹登庆2,张迎春1,3. 单折太阳翼支承点分布优化分析 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(24): 177-181.
[10]
崔 莹1,3, 赵均海2 张常光2 孙珊珊2 陈兵1. 复式空心钢管混凝土柱抗爆性能及损伤研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(21): 188-193.
[11]
孙治国1,司炳君1,陈 灿1,王东升2. 山区桥梁排架抗震能力评价方法 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(18): 1-6.
[12]
倪永军;李钊;杨娜;盛能军;. “站桥合一”式车站结构抗震性能评估的简化方法 [J]. , 2014, 33(5): 137-142.
[13]
何玉阳;袁泉. 框支密肋复合墙结构模型振动台试验研究 [J]. , 2014, 33(22): 72-77.
[14]
王 伟;王明兴. 新型钢管柱-H形梁铸钢模块化节点的概念设计与抗震性能评估 [J]. , 2014, 33(21): 13-20.
[15]
曹晖;雍彪;华建民;李国荣;. 钢套箍钢筋混凝土梁柱节点低周反复加载试验研究 [J]. , 2014, 33(19): 123-128.