振动信号包络线的稀疏重构最优化算法研究与应用

摘要
图/表
参考文献(16)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1129 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要经验模态分解是处理非线性、非平稳信号的有效方法，其核心关键是包络线的提取。针对目前提出的包络拟合算法所存在的端点效应、拟合误差大、抗噪性低等问题，在文献[9]的基础上，提出一种基于稀疏复原最优化算法提取信号包络线的方法。首先利用外罚函数将包络线稀疏优化模型的凹问题转换为凸二次规划问题；其次采用混合变异粒子群算法对改变稀疏基频带宽度的变化因子进行全局寻优，利用最优变化因子构建适合包络线变化趋势的最佳稀疏基，然后将采集信号的所有极值点作为稀疏重构过程中的观测值，利用最佳稀疏基与观测值建立稀疏重构模型，使用内点法对该模型进行处理，最终自适应地得到了全局最优的包络线信号。结果表明，该方法可以有效抑制端点飞翼问题，粒子群算法的引入可以自适应地匹配最优的稀疏基映射带宽，在拟合精度和抗噪声等性能方面获得了比文献[9]更好的效果，有效提高了包络线拟合精度和抗噪性。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：经验模态分解, 稀疏复原优化, 粒子群算法, 内点法

Abstract：Empirical mode decomposition (EMD) is one of effective methods to process nonlinear and non-stationary signals, its key is to extract signals’ envelope curve. A method based on the sparse recovery optimizing algorithm was proposed to overcome defects of the envelope fitting algorithm, such as, end effect, bigger fitting error and low anti-noise ability, etc. Firstly, the concave problem of envelope sparse optimal model was converted into a convex quadratic programming problem by using exterior penalty functions. Secondly, the mixed variant particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm was used to solve the global optimization of the variant factor m which changes the sparse base’s frequency band width. This m was employed to build the optimal sparse bases being suitable for envelope variation trend. All extreme value points of the collected signal were taken as observed values in the process of sparse recovery. The optimal sparse bases and observed values were used to establish the sparse recovery model. The interior-point method was adopted to process the built model. Finally, the globally optimal envelope signal was gained adaptively. The results showed that this method can effectively suppress the end effect; PSO introduced here can adaptively match the mapping band width of the optimal spare bases, it improves the signal envelope fitting precision and noise immunity.

Key words： empirical mode decomposition (EMD) sparse recovery optimization particle swarm optimization (PSO) interior-point method

收稿日期: 2016-11-29 出版日期: 2018-03-28

引用本文:

于岩君，叶庆卫，陆志华，周宇. 振动信号包络线的稀疏重构最优化算法研究与应用[J]. 振动与冲击, 2018, 37(7): 179-185.
YUYan-junYE Qing-weiLU Zhi-huaZHOU Yu. Sparse recovery optimizing Algorithm for vibration signal envelopes. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2018, 37(7): 179-185.

链接本文:

http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/Y2018/V37/I7/179

[1] Huang N E, Shen Z, Long S R, et al. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical& Engineering Sciences, 1998, 454(1971):903-995.
[2] Delechelle E, Lemoine J,Niang O. Empirical mode decomposition: An analytical approach for sifting process[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2005, 12(11):764-767.
[3] Cheng J, Yu D, Yu Y. The application of energy operator demodulation approach based on EMD in machinery fault diagnosis[J]. Mechanical Systems & Signal Processing, 2007, 21(2):668-677.
[4] Fleureau J, Nunes J C, Kachenoura A, et al. Turning Tangent Empirical Mode Decomposition: A Framework for Mono-and Multivariate Signals[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2011, 59(3):1309-1316.
[5] 杨云飞. 基于EMD分解技术的不同市场原油价格相关性分析及预测研究[D].武汉：华中科技大学,2011.
[6] 钟佑明. 希尔伯特-黄变换局瞬信号分析理论的研究[D]. 重庆：重庆大学,2002..
[7] 张帆, 丁康. 广义检波解调分析的三种算法及其局限性研究[J]. 振动工程学报, 2002, 15(2):243-248.
ZHANG Fan，DING Kang.Research on the Three Algorithms and Limitations of GeneralizedDetection-Filtering Demodulation Analysis[J].Journal of vibration enginering，2002, 15(2):243-248.
[8] 张郁山,梁建文,胡聿贤. 应用自回归模型处理EMD方法中的边界问题[J]. 自然科学进展, 2003,13(10):48-53.
ZHANG Yu-shan，LIANG Jian-wen，HU Yu-xian.The pro-
cessing of end effects in EMD method by autoregressive model.[J].Progresses in Nature Science，2003,13(10):48-53.
[9] 徐静妹，叶庆卫，王晓东，等. 斜拉索振动信号的包络线稀疏复原算法[J]. 振动与冲击，2015，34(23)：187-193.
XU Jing-mei，YE Qing-wei，WANG Xiao-dong，et al.Envelope sparse recovery algorithm for stay cable vibration signals[J]. Journal of vibration and Shock，2015，34(23)：187-193.
[10] Candes E J, Tao T. Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies?[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2007, 52(12):5406-5425.
[11] Boeringer D W, Werner D H. Particle Swarm Optimization Versus Genetic Algorithms for Phased Array Synthesis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas & Propagation, 2004, 52(3):771-779.
[12] Mallat S G, Zhang Z. Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1993, 41(12):3397-3415.
[13] Seung-Jean Kim, K. Koh, M.Lustig,et al. An Interior-Point Method for Large-Scale l 1 -Regularized Least Squares[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2007, 8(3):1519-1555.
[14] 陈君波, 叶庆卫, 周宇,等. 一种新的混合变异粒子群算法[J]. 计算机工程与应用,2007, 43(7):59-61.
CHEN Jun-bo，YE Qing-wei，ZHOU Yu，et al.New Multi- Mutation Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm[J].Computer Engineering and Applications, 2007, 43(7): 59- 61.
[15] Ye, Feng Q , Yuan Z , et al. Nonlinear Vibration Signal Tracking of Large Offshore Bridge Stayed Cable Based on Particle Filter [J]. Polish Maritime Research, 2016, 22(4):70-75.
[16] Ye Q, Feng Z, Zhan Q. Vibration signal fundamental frequency estimation of bridge stayed cable based on era algorithm.[J].Journal of the Balkan Tribological Association 2016, 22(2):1335-1343.