1.Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of China Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China;
2.Postdoctoral Research Station of Mechanics, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
Abstract:In order to study the seismic behaviors of special-shaped CFT mega bifurcate columns coupled with multiple cavities in different cross sectional direction, five specimens were tested under a twice repeated horizontal low cyclic load.In the tests, three types of loading directions were considered, including long axial, short axial and 45 degree directions.And there are two types of joint core region constructions including a basic one and an enhanced one by increasing the quantity of steel tube cavities.The test results show that the arrangement of welding seams leads the failure trend under accumulated damage.The failure features appear as steel plate tearing caused by crazing and extending of welding seams at the lower horizontal partitioning steel plate of lower columns.The specimens in long axis possess higher bearing capacity, stiffness, deformability and energy dissipating ability than those in short axis, while the specimens in 45 degree directions take the middle seismic performance.The enhanced construction can increase bearing capacity, stiffness and energy dissipating ability in some degree.The bearing capacity degradation is slight under the same repeated load.The upper columns are the main parts of deformation and energy dissipation, and the proportion is between 60% and 70%.Each specimen possesses good elastic-plastic deformability, and can be used in the seismic design of mega frame structures in super high-rise buildings.
[1] 蒋欢军,和留生,吕西林,等. 上海中心大厦抗震性能分析和振动台试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2011,32(11):55-63.
Jiang Huanjun, He Liusheng, Lu Xilin, et al. Analysis of seismic performance and shaking table tests of the Shanghai Tower[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2011, 32(11): 55-63.
[2] 傅学怡,吴国勤,黄用军,等. 平安金融中心结构设计研究综述[J]. 建筑结构,2012,42(4):21-27.
Fu Xueyi, Wu Guoqin, Huang Yongjun, et al. Research on structural design of Pingan Financial Centre[J]. Building Structure, 2012, 42(4): 21-27.
[3] 杨蔚彪,宫贞超,常为华,等. 中国尊大厦巨型柱分叉节点性能研究[J]. 建筑结构,2015,45(18):6-12.
Yang Weibiao, Gong Zhenchao, Chang Weihua, et al. Performance study on branching node of mega column in China Zun Tower[J]. Building Structure, 2015, 45(18): 6-12.
[4] 王丹,吕西林. T形、L形钢管混凝土柱抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2005,26(4):39-44.
Wang Dan, Lu Xilin. Experimental study on seismic behavior of concrete-filled steel T-section and L-section columns[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2005, 26(4): 39-44.
[5] 林震宇,沈祖炎,罗金辉,等. L形钢管混凝土轴压短柱力学性能研究[J]. 建筑钢结构进展,2009,11(6):14-19.
Lin Zhenyu, Shen Zuyan, Luo Jinhui, et al. Study on behavior of L-shaped concrete-filled steel tube stubs subjected to axial compression[J]. Progress in Steel Building Structures, 2009, 11(6):14-19.
[6] 蔡健,左志亮,谢小东,等. 带约束拉杆异形截面钢管内核心混凝土等效单轴本构关系[J]. 建筑结构学报,2011,32(12):186-194.
Cai Jian, Zuo Zhiliang, Xie Xiaodong, et al. Equivalent uniaxial constitutive relationship for core concrete of specially-shaped steel tubular column with bending bars[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2011, 32(12): 186-194.
[7] 杜国锋,宋鑫,余思平. 内置钢骨组合L形截面钢管混凝土短柱轴压性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2013,34(8):82-89.
Du Guofeng, Song Xin, Yu Siping. Experimental research on axially loaded composite L-section steel tubular short columns filled with steel-reinforced concrete[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2013, 34(8): 82-89.
[8] 屠永清,刘林林,叶英华. 多室式钢管混凝土T形短柱的非线性分析[J]. 工程力学,2012,29(1):134-140.
Tu Yongqing, Liu Linlin, Ye Yinghua.Nonlinear analysis of multi-cell T-shaped concrete-filled steel tubular stub columns[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2012, 29(1): 134-140.
[9] 王伟,严鹏. 钢管混凝土分叉柱节点受力性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2013,34(S1):123-127.
Wang Wei, Yan Peng. Experimental study on mechanical behavior of concrete filled steel tubular intersecting connections[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2013, 34(S1): 123-127.
[10] 李正良,刘红军,赵仕兴. 方钢管混凝土分叉柱与钢梁连接节点的抗震性能研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2009,30(1):87-94.
Li Zhengliang, Liu Hongjun, Zhao Shixing. Research on seismic behavior of concrete-filled square steel tube bifurcate column-to-steel beam connections[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2009, 30(1): 87-94.
[11] 许成祥,吴赞军,曾磊,等. T形钢管混凝土柱-工字钢梁框架顶层边节点抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2012,33(8):58-65.
Xu Chengxiang, Wu Zanjun, Zeng Lei, et al. Experimental research on seismic behavior of top corner joints in composite frame consisting of CFST T-shaped columns and steel beams[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2012, 33(8): 58-65.
[12] 许成祥,刘晓强,杜国锋,等. 十字截面钢管混凝土柱框架中柱节点抗震性能对比研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报,2012,34(8):118-122.
Xu Chengxiang, Liu Xiaoqiang, Du Guofeng, et al. Comparison and analysis on seismic behavior of interior joints in the composite frame consisting of CFST crisscross section columns and steel beams[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2012, 34(8): 118-122.
[13] 周鹏,薛建阳,陈茜,等. 矩形钢管混凝土异形柱-钢梁框架节点抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2012,33(8):41-50.
Zhou Peng, Xue Jianyang, Chen Xi, et al. Shear capacity of joints between concrete-filled square steel tubular special-shpaed columns and steel beams[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2012, 33(8): 41-50.
[14] 武海鹏,曹万林,董宏英,张建伟. 异形截面多腔钢管混凝土柱轴压承载力计算方法研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2016,37(9):126-133.
Wu Haipeng, Cao Wanlin, Dong Hongying, Zhang Jianwei. Bearing capacity calculation method for special-shpaed CFST columns coupled with multiple cavities under axial compression[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2019, 37(9): 126-133.
[15] 曹万林,武海鹏,王立长,等. 不同加载方向下五边形截面钢管混凝土巨型柱抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2014,35(1):69-76.
Cao Wanlin, Wu Haipeng, Wang Lichang, et al. Seismic behavior of pentagonal cross-section CFST mega-columns under horizontal loading in different directions[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2014, 35(1): 69-76.
[16] 曹万林,徐萌萌,董宏英,等. 不同构造五边形钢管混凝土巨型柱轴压性能计算分析[J]. 工程力学,2015,32(6):99-108.
Cao Wanlin, Xu Mengmeng, Dong Hongying, et al. Analysis on axial compression behavior of pentagonal CFST mega columns[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2015, 32(6): 99-108.
[17] Park R. Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing[J]. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 1989, 22(3): 155-166.