Wind tunnel tests for wind loads on a tubular transmission tower via multi-balance synchronous force measurement
ZHANG Hongjie1,HUANG Yang2,ZHOU Qi2,3
1.China Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing 100192, China;
2.Department of civil and environmental engineering, Shantou University, Shantou, 515063, China;
3.Key Laboratory of Structure and Wind Tunnel of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Shantou University, Shantou, 515063, China
Abstract:Some results have been achieved about the wind load on the transmission tower under horizontal wind, but there is less study on the wind load on the transmission tower under horizontal wind combined with vertical wind. The aerodynamic force coefficients of the transmission tower body model under the combined action of horizontal wind and vertical wind were obtained by using wind tunnel tests measure multi-balance synchronous force measurement method. The experimental results show that the method can directly and accurately measure the wind load on transmission tower components. Compared to conventional tests, the method can be used to measure the wind load on the transmission tower body model with simultaneous tilt and yaw angles, can accurately simulate the airflow around the transmission tower, and also can reduce or even avoid the boundary layer effect caused by the wind tunnel ground or the separation platform; When the tilt angle of incoming wind is within the range of -5° to 5°, the influence of the vertical wind on the drag coefficient is slight and can be ignored. When the tilt angle of incoming wind is larger than 5°, the vertical wind exerts a significant influence on the aerodynamic coefficients of the transmission tower body, which cannot be neglected.
[1] Holmes, J D.. Recent developments in the specification of wind loads on transmission lines[J]. Journal of Wind & Engineering,2008, 5(1):8-18.
[2] Loredo-Souza A M., Davenport A G.. The influence of the design methodology in the response of transmission towers to wind loading[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2003, 91(8):995-1005.
[3] Støttrup-Andersen, U.. Analysis and design of masts and towers[C]. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Lightweight Structures in Civil Engineering. Warsaw, 2002.
[4] da, Silva J G S., da, P C G., Vellasco, S., et al. Structural assessment of current steel design models for transmission and telecommunication towers[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2005, 61(8): 1108-1134.
[5] Okamura T, Ohkuma T, Hongo E, et al. Wind response analysis of a transmission tower in a mountainous area [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 2003, 91(1): 53-63.
[6] 李春祥, 李锦华, 于志强. 输电塔线体系抗风设计理论与发展[J].振动与冲击,2009,28(10):15-25.
Liu C X., Li J H., Yu Z Q.. A review of wind-resistant design theories of transmission tower-line systems[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock,2009,28(10):15-25.
[7] 梁峰,李黎,尹鹏.大跨越输电塔-线体系数值分析模型的研究[J].振动与冲击,2007,26(2):61-65.
Liang F., Li L., Yin P.. Investigation on numerical model of electrical transmission tower-line system with a big span[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock,2007,26(2):61-65.
[8] 邓洪洲, 司瑞娟, 段成荫,等. 输电塔气动力系数和气动导纳风洞试验研究[J].振动与冲击,2015,34(3):188-195.
Deng H Z., Si R J., Duan C Y., et al. Wind tunnel test for aerodynamic coefficient and aerodynamic admittance of a transmission tower[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock,2015,34(3):188-195.
[9] 楼文娟, 夏亮, 蒋莹, 等. B类风场与台风风场下输电塔的风振响应和风振系数[J].振动与冲击, 2013,32(6):13-17.
Lou W J., Xiang L., Jiang Y., et al. Wind-induced response and wind load factor of transmission tower under terrain B wind field and typhoon wind field[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock,2013,32(6):13-17.
[10] Selvam, R P., Holmes, J D.. Numerical simulation of thunderstorm downdrafts[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics , 1992, 44(1-3):2817-2825.
[11] Vickery, P J., Twisdale, L A.. Analysis of Thunderstorm Occurrences and Wind Speed Statistics[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1995, 55:813-821.
[12] Schewe, G.. On the force fluctuations acting on a circular cylinder in crossflow from subcritical up to transcritical Reynolds numbers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mech, 1983,133:265–285.
[13] American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). ASCE manuals and reports on engineering practice No.74. Reston[S], American, 2010.