覆冰多分裂导线三种TMD防舞效果对比研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献(23)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1358 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要在风洞试验验证的覆冰导线三自由度运动方程基础上建立了竖向、扭转向和竖扭耦合调谐质量阻尼器和导线系统的运动方程。提出采用扭转向和竖扭耦合的调谐质量阻尼器进行舞动防治，并与竖向调谐质量阻尼器进行对比。根据李雅普诺夫第一稳定定理计算导线-阻尼器系统起舞风速，采用Newmark-Beta法求解运动方程验证起舞风速的正确性。计算了D形覆冰6分裂导线全攻角舞动幅值，以舞动幅值最大的170°风攻角为目标风攻角，以提高目标风攻角起舞风速为优化目标，对3种调谐质量阻尼器进行参数优化，并对比研究了不同风攻角下3种阻尼器在最优参数下对于导线起舞风速提高的效果。研究表明：竖向调谐质量阻尼器在覆冰侧迎风的5°~20°风攻角下降低了起舞风速；扭转向调谐质量阻尼器使得覆冰侧迎风的0°~40°风攻角的导线起舞风速提高至10m/s以上；竖扭耦合的调谐质量阻尼器较另外两种形式的调谐质量阻尼器具有更好的提高起舞风速的效果。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	楼文娟
	梁洪超
	温作鹏

关键词 ：舞动, 输电线路, 竖向TMD, 扭转向TMD, 竖扭耦合TMD, 振动控制, 多分裂导线

Abstract：The equations of bundled conductor attached with either vertical, torsional or vertical-torsional coupled tuned mass damper were established based on the experimental verified 3 DOF conduct equations. Torsional and vertical-torsional coupled tuned mass damper were proposed to prevent galloping, and compared with the vertical tuned mass damper. The galloping wind velocity of conductor-damper system was calculated applying Lyapunov's first stability theorem. The galloping wind velocity was verified by solving the equations applying Newmark-Beta method. The galloping amplitude of an D-shaped 6- bundled conductor section model was calculated at each wind attack angle, and the170 degree wind attack angle which has the largest galloping amplitude, was chosen as the target attack angle and the optimization objective was improving the galloping wind speed of the target attack angle, the parameters of tuned mass dampers were optimized, the effects of the dampers on the galloping wind velocity under the optimal parameters were studied and compared at different wind attack angles. The results show: vertical tuned mass damper decreases the galloping wind speed at the attack angle from 10 to 20 degree; torsional tuned mass damper increases the galloping wind speed to more than 10 m/s at 0 ~40 degree wind attack angle; vertical-torsional coupled tuned mass damper has a better effect on improving the galloping wind speed.

Key words： Galloping Transmission line Vertical TMD Torsional TMD Vertical-torsional coupled TMD Vibration control Multi- bundled conductor;

收稿日期: 2018-12-13 出版日期: 2020-07-15

引用本文:

楼文娟，梁洪超，温作鹏. 覆冰多分裂导线三种TMD防舞效果对比研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(14): 36-42.
LOU Wenjuan，LIANG Hongchao，WEN Zuopeng. Comparative study on the anti-galloping effect of three types of TMDs for iced multi-bundled conductors. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2020, 39(14): 36-42.

链接本文:

http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/Y2020/V39/I14/36

[1] 郭应龙，李国兴，尤传永. 输电线路舞动[M]. 第一版. 北京三里河路6号: 中国电力出版社, 2003.
Guo Yinglong, Li Guoxing, You Chuanyong. Transmission line Dancing [M]. First Edition. No. 6 Sanlihe Road, Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2003.
[2] 卢明，傅观君，阎东，等. 河南电网500kV同塔双回线路舞动事故分析计算[J]. 高电压技术. 2014(05): 1391-1398.
Lu Ming, Fu Guanjun, Yan Dong, et al. Galloping Fault Analysis and Computation for 500 kV Double Lines in One Tower in Henan Grid [J]. High Voltage Technology. 2014 (05): 1391-1398.
[3] 赵彬，程永峰，王景朝，等. 2015年初湖北架空线路覆冰舞动灾害原因的理论分析与应对措施[J]. 振动与冲击. 2017(10): 93-97.
Zhao Bin, Cheng Yongfeng, Wang Jingchao, et al. Theoretical analysis and countermeasures on the galloping
of iced overhead transmission lines in Hubei in early 201 5 [J]. Vibration and shock. 2017 (10): 93-97.
[4] 李新民，朱宽军，李军辉. 输电线路舞动分析及防治方法研究进展[J]. 高电压技术. 2011, 37(2): 484-490.
Li Xin-min, Zhu Kuan-jun, Li Jun-hui. Review on Analysis and Prevention Measures of Galloping for Transmission Line. [J]. High voltage technology. 2011, 37 (2): 484-490.
[5] 张勇平，刘鸿斌，邓春，等. 沽太500kV双回线路覆冰舞动故障分析[J]. 中国电力. 2010, 43(3): 27-30.
Zhang Yong-ping, Liu Hong-bin, Deng Chun, et al. Analysis of 500 kV Gu-Tai transmission line ice-coating galloping [J]. China Electric Power. 2010, 43 (3): 27-30.
[6] Den Hartog J P. Transmission line vibration due to sleet[J]. AIEE Transactions. 1932(51): 1074-1076.
[7] O. Nigol P G B. Conductor Galloping Part I - Den Hartog Mechanism[J]. IEEE Trans. On Power Apparatus and systems. 1981, Vol. PAS-100(No. 2): 699-707.
[8] O. Nigol P G B. Conductor Galloping Part II - Torsional Mechanism[J]. IEEE Trans. On Power Apparatus and systems. 1981, 100(5): 708-720.
[9] Yu P, Popplewell N, Shah A H. Instability trends of inertially coupled galloping: Part II: Periodic vibrations[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 1995, 183(4): 679-691.
[10] Yu P, Shah A H, Popplewell N. Inertially coupled galloping og iced conductors[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics-transactions of the ASME. 1992, 59(1): 140-145.
[11] Yu P, Desai Y M, Shah A H, et al. 3-degree-of-freedom model for galloping .1. formulation[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics-ASCE. 1993, 119(12): 2404-2425.
[12] Zhang Q, Popplewell N, Shah A H. Galloping of bundle conductor[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2000, 234(1): 115-134.
[13] Chabart O, Lilien, J L. Galloping of electrical lines in wind tunnel facilities[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics. 1998, 74: 967-976.
[14] Keutgen R, Lilien J L. Benchmark cases for galloping with results obtained from wind tunnel facilities validation of a finite element model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery., 15(1): 367-374.
[15] 楼文娟，王昕，许福友. 覆冰导线气弹模型舞动风洞试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报. 2011, 44(11): 18-23.
Lou Wenjuan, Wang Xin, Xu Fuyou. A wind tunnel study on galloping of an aeroelastic iced conductor model [J]. Journal of Civil Engineering. 2011, 44 (11): 18-23.
[16] 楼文娟，余江，姜雄，等. 覆冰导线三自由度耦合舞动稳定性判定及气动阻尼研究[J]. 土木工程学报. 2017(02): 55-64.
Lou Wenjuan, Yu Jiang, Jiang Xiong, et al. Stability evaluation and aerodynamic damping study on three-degree-of-freedom coupled galloping of iced conductors [J]. Journal of Civil Engineering. 2017 (02): 55-64.
[17] 楼文娟，余江，姜雄，等. 覆冰六分裂导线舞动风洞试验及起舞风速研究[J]. 振动工程学报. 2017(02): 280-289.
Lou Wen-juan, Yu Jiang, Jiang Xiong, et al. Wind tunnel test and critical galloping of 6-bundled wind speed study for iced conductors [J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering. 2017 (02): 280-289.
[18] 姜雄，楼文娟. 三自由度体系覆冰导线舞动激发机理分析的矩阵摄动法[J]. 振动工程学报. 2016(06): 1070-1078.
Jiang Xiong, Lou Wen-juan. Matrix perturbation method for analysis of 3 DOF iced transmission line galloping mechanism [J].Journal of Vibration Engineering. 2016 (06): 1070-1078.
[19] Qin Z, Chen Y, Zhan X, et al. Research on the galloping and anti-galloping of the transmission line[J]. International Journal of Bifurcation And Chaos. 2012, 22(12500382).
[20] Guo H, Liu B, Yu Y, et al. Galloping suppression of a suspended cable with wind loading by a nonlinear energy sink[J]. Archive of Applied Mechanics. 2017, 87(6): 1007-1018.
[21] Xu Z, Xu L, Xu F. Study on the Iced Quad-Bundle Transmission Lines Incorporated With Viscoelastic Antigalloping Devices[J]. Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control-Transactions of The ASME. 2015, 137(0610096).
[22] Malher A, Touze C, Doare O, et al. Flutter Control of a Two-Degrees-of-Freedom Airfoil Using a Nonlinear Tuned Vibration Absorber[J]. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics. 2017, 12(0510165).
[23] 吴炜，顾明，项海帆. 用调质阻尼器控制桥梁颤振[J]. 振动与冲击. 1995,54(2):12-16;
Wu Wei, Gu Ming, Xiang Haifan. Flutter Control of large-span bridges by using passive tuned mass damper.[J].Vibration and Shock. 1995,54(2):12-16;