射流噪声测量中远场测量边界影响研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献(25)
相关文章 (2)

全文: PDF (2735 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要射流噪声实验是射流噪声产生机理及降噪措施研究的最重要手段之一。为确保射流噪声远场测量数据可信，远场传声器的布置需在远场条件和最终数据的信噪比之间进行合理的选取。通过严格的射流噪声模拟装置，采用精细的声学测量及修正手段，系统的研究了射流噪声不同测量角度及位置、不同射流速度等因素对远场测量结果的影响规律，并对射流噪声频谱随距离的增加而变化的特性进行了机理分析。通过试验确定了射流噪声远场测量时的最小远场边界条件，对于不满足远场边界条件的远场噪声测量，给出了适当的修正的方法。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张俊龙1
	雷红胜2
	赵鲲2
	马瑞轩2
	李杰1

关键词 ：射流噪声, 气动噪声测量, 远场测量, 消声室, 数据修正

Abstract：Jet noise test is one of the most important means to study jet noise generation mechanism and denoising measures.In order to ensure the reliability of jet noise’s far field measurement data, a reasonable selection needs to be made between far field microphone layout condition and SNR of the final data.A strict design of jet noise simulation device and sophisticated acoustic measurement and correction method were used to systematically study influence laws of jet noise measuring angle and position, and jet speed, etc.factors on far field measurement results.The mechanism analysis was done for jet noise spectra variation features with increase in distance.Finally, the minimum far field boundary condition for far field measurement of jet noise was determined with tests, and an appropriate correction method was presented for far field jet noise measurements not satisfying far field boundary conditions.

Key words： jet noise aerodynamic noise measurement far field measurement anechoic chamber data correction

收稿日期: 2019-06-19 出版日期: 2020-10-28

引用本文:

张俊龙1，雷红胜2，赵鲲2，马瑞轩2，李杰1. 射流噪声测量中远场测量边界影响研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(21): 47-54.
ZHANG Junlong1, LEI Hongsheng2, ZHAO Kun2, MA Ruixuan2, LI Jie1. Influences of far field measurement boundary on jet noise measurements. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2020, 39(21): 47-54.

链接本文:

http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/Y2020/V39/I21/47

[1] 唐川林, 徐旭, 王霞光, 胡东. 自振脉冲喷嘴异形结构对射流冲蚀性能的影响[J]. 振动与冲击, 2018, 37(15): 118-123.
TANG Chuanlin, XU Xu, WANG Xiaguang, HU Dong. Effects of nozzle’s special-shaped structure on erosion performances of a self-excited oscillation pulsed jet. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2018, 37(15): 118-123. (in Chinese).
[2] 黄磊, 蒋伟康, 晏维华, 马建平. 工业喷嘴喷注噪声的抑制技术研究[J]. , 2009, 28(8): 106-108.
Huang lei, Jiang Weikang, Yan Weihua, Ma Jianping. Study of Noise Control from an Industrial Jet[J]. 2009, 28(8): 106-108. (in Chinese).
[3] Viswanathan K. Jet Aeroacoustic testing: issues and implications[J]. AIAA Journal, 2003, Vol.41, No.9.
[4] 韩标,姚朝辉,许宏庆. 小口径喷嘴冲击射流噪声锯齿特性及机理研究[J]. 振动与冲击,2003, Vol.22, No.4.
Hang biao, Yao chaohui, Xu hongqing. On the saw-tooth characteristic and its mechanism of the impinging jet noise from small diameter nozzle onto large flat plate[J]. 2003, 22(4). (in Chinese).
[5] Ahuja K K. Designing clean jet noise facilities and making accurate jet noise measurements[R]. AIAA 2003-0706.
[6] Bertrand M, Thomas C, Christophe B. Experimental characterisation of the screech feedback loop in underexpanded round jets[J]. Journal Fluid Mechanics, 2017, vol.824, pp. 202-229.
[7] Olivier P. CEPRA19: the ONERA large anechoic facility[C]. 15th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference(30th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference). AIAA 2009-3303.
[8] Bozak R F, Henderson B S. Aeroacoustic experiments with twin jets[R]. NASA/TM-2012-217249.
[9] Pinker R A. The enhancement of the QinetiQ noise test facility[C]. 10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. AIAA 2004-3019.
[10] Berry M G, Magstadt A S, Glauser M N. Application of POD on time-resolved schlieren in supersonic multi-stream rectangular jets[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2017, 29, 020706.
[11] 庄家煜，李晓东，喷流噪声控制方法实验研究[J]. 工程热物理学报. Vol.29，No.4，2008.04.
Zhuang Jiayu, Li Xiaodong. Experimental Study on Noise Control Methods [J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics. Vol.29，No.4，2008.04. (in Chinese).
[12] Jordan P., Colonius T, Wave packets and turbulent jet noise[J]. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2013, 45, 173-195.
[13] Mancinelli M, Pagliaroli T, Marco A D, etc., Wavelet decomposition of hydrodynamic and acoustic pressures in the near field of the jet[J]. J. Fluid Mech. 2017, 813, 716-749.
[14] Karon A Z, Ahuja K K，How Small can a Nozzle be for Accurately Scaling Jet Noise to a Larger Nozzle[C]. 20th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. AIAA 2014-2907.
[15] Gaeta R J, Ahuja K K. Subtle Differences in Jet-Noise Scaling with Narrowband Spectra Compared to 1/3-Octave Band[C]. 9th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit. AIAA-2003-3124.
[16] Viswanathan K. Instrumentation considerations for accurate jet noise measurements[J]. AIAA Journal, Vol.44, No.6, June 2006.
[17] Cliff B, James B. Small hot jet acoustic rig validation[R]. NASA /TM-2006-214234.
[18] Simonich J C, Narayanan S, and Schlinker R H. Facility and data quality issues for scale-model jet noise testing[C]. 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA 2003-1057.
[19] SAE Standard Values of Atmospheric Absorption as a Function of Temperature and Humidity[R]. ARP866B PP.382 SAE 2012.
[20] Tam C K W. Supersonic Jet Noise[J]. Annual Review Fluid Mechanics,1995, 27, 17-43.
[21] Tam C K W, Golebiowski M, Seiner J M. On the two components of turbulent mixing noise form supersonic jets[R]. AIAA 1996-1716.
[22] Viswanathan K. Analysis of the two similarity components of turbulent mixing noise[J]. AIAA Journal, 2002, 40(9): 1735- 1744.
[23] Gary G P, James E B, Brenda S H. Phased array noise source localization measurements of an F404 nozzle plumeat both full and model scale[R]. NASA /TM-2010-216366.
[24] Nick P B, Ahuja K K. Measuring jet noise source locations with acoustic beamforming[C]. 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2015, AIAA 2015-0735.
[25] Viswanathan K. Aeroacoustic of hot jets[C]. 8th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference & Exhibit, June 2002, AIAA 2002-2481.