|
|
Low-speed ballistic impact test and numerical simulation on re-entrant circular honeycomb sandwich panels |
YANG Shu1,2, CHEN Pengyu1,2, JIANG Feng1,2, PEI Lianzheng1,2, QI Chang1,2 |
1.State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, School of Automotive Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China; 2.Ningbo Research Institute, Dalian University of Technology, Ningbo 315016, China |
|
|
Abstract For ballistic impact protection, 1060 aluminum alloy re-entrant circular (REC) and traditional re-entrant (RE) hexagonal honeycomb sandwich panels were designed and fabricated. The dynamic response and protection performance of the two types of honeycomb sandwich panels under low-speed ballistic impact load were studied and compared by using steel cylindrical projectile low-speed impact test and finite element (FE) numerical simulation. Using the verified FE model, the effects of ballistic speed on the maximum permanent compression, local Poisson’s ratio and energy absorption partition of two types of honeycomb sandwich panels under low-speed ballistic impact were simulated and analyzed. Finally, the effects of structural parameters such as circular cell wall radius and cell length of REC honeycomb cell on the low-speed ballistic impact response of sandwich panel were studied. The results show that compared with RE honeycomb, REC honeycomb sandwich panel has smaller maximum permanent compression and better ballistic performance under the same ballistic impact load, and the advantage is more obvious at low speed; With the decrease of cell length and circular cell wall radius, the ballistic performance of REC honeycomb sandwich panel can be further improved.
|
Received: 17 January 2022
Published: 28 March 2023
|
|
|
|
[1] ZHANG D, FEI Q, ZHANG P. In–plane dynamic crushing behavior and energy absorption of honeycombs with a novel type of multi-cells [J]. Thin Wall Struct, 2017, 117: 199-210.
[2] QI C, JIANG F, YANG S, et al. Multi-scale characterization of novel re-entrant circular auxetic honeycombs under quasi-static crushing [J]. Thin Wall Struct, 2021, 169, 108314.
[3] 任鑫, 张相玉, 谢亿民. 负泊松比材料和结构的研究进展 [J]. 力学学报, 2019, 51(03): 656-687.
REN Xin, ZHANG Xiangyu, XIE Yimin. Research progress in auxetic materials and structures [J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2019, 51(03): 656-687.
[4] 虞科炯, 徐峰祥, 华林. 正弦曲边负泊松比蜂窝结构面内冲击性能研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(13): 51-59.
YU Kejiong, XU Fengxiang, Hua Lin. In plane impact performance of honeycomb structure with sinusoidal curved edge and negative possion's ratio [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40(13): 51-59.
[5] 白临奇, 史小全, 刘宏瑞, 等. 冲击载荷下箭头型负泊松比蜂窝结构动态吸能性能研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(11): 70-77.
BAI Linqi, SHI Xiaoquan, Liu Hongrui, et al. Dynamic energy absorption performance of arrow type honeycomb structure with negative Poisson's ratio under impact load [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40(11): 70-77.
[6] 韩会龙, 张新春. 星形节点周期性蜂窝结构的面内动力学响应特性研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(23): 223-231.
HAN Huilong, ZHANG Xinchun. In-plane dynamic impact response characteristics of periodic 4-pointstar-shaped honeycomb structures [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(23): 223-231.
[7] QI C, JIANG F, REMENNIKOV A, et al. Quasi-static crushing behavior of novel re-entrant circular auxetic honeycombs [J]. Compos Part B-Eng, 2020, 197, 108117.
[8] 熊飞扬, 高松林, 李晓彬, 等. 局部冲击载荷作用下星形蜂窝夹芯梁的动态响应研究 [J]. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版), 2020, 44(02): 388-392.
XIONG Feiyang, GAO Songlin, LI Xiaobin, et al. Study on Dynamic response of Star Honeycomb sandwich beam under local impact load. [J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology(Transportation Science & Engineering), 2020, 44(02): 388-392.
[9] 罗伟铭, 石少卿, 廖瑜, 等. 成层式铝蜂窝夹芯结构冲击响应试验研究 [J]. 材料导报, 2018, 32(08): 1328-1332.
LUO Weiming, SHI Shaoqing, LIAO Yu, et al. An experimental investigation upon the impact response of the layered aluminum honeycomb sandwich structure [J]. Materials Guide, 2018, 32(08): 1328-1332.
[10] 王堃, 孙勇, 彭明军, 等. 基于ANSYS的铝蜂窝夹芯板低速冲击仿真模拟研究.[J]. 材料导报, 2012, 26(08): 157-160.
WANG Kun, SUN Yong, PENG Mingjun, et al. Simulation of low-velocity impact of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels with ANSYS.[J]. Materials Reports, 2012, 26(08): 157-160.
[11] LU Z, GONG W, CHEN S, et al. Interfacial microstructure and local bonding strength of magnetic pulse welding joint between commercially pure aluminum 1060 and AISI 304 stainless steel [J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2019, 46: 59-66.
[12] 杨姝, 江峰, 丁宏飞, 等. 手性蜂窝夹芯概念发动机罩行人头部保护性能仿真 [J]. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(12): 38-42+61.
YANG Shu, JIANG Feng, DING Hongfei, et al. Pedestrian head Protection performance simulation of chiral honeycomb sandwich conceptual engine hood [J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2019, 47(12): 38-42+61.
[13] HOU Xiuhui, DENG Zichen, ZHOU Jiaxi. Symplectic analysis for the wave propagation properties of conventional and auxetic cellular structures [J]. International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modelling, 2011, 2(4): 298–314. |
|
|
|