|
|
Effects of adhesive layer on anti-penetration performance of ceramic/metal composite armour |
GAO Yubo 1 , ZHANG Wei 2 , YI Chenhong 3, TANG Tiegang 3 |
1. School of Sciences, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China;
2. School of Aerospace, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150080, China;
3. Institute of Fluid Physics, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, China |
|
|
Abstract Here, the two-stage light gas gun equipment and the software AUTODYN were used to analyze the anti-penetration performance of ceramic/metal composite armor with epoxy resin adhesive layer. Ceramic plate has two forms including single layer form and laminated one corresponding to C/E/A (Ceramic/Epoxy resin/Aluminum alloy) armor and C/E/C/E/A (Ceramic/Epoxy resin/ Ceramic/Epoxy resin/Aluminum alloy) one. Results showed that under actions of stress wave and broken cone, crushing degree of ceramic plate in form of C/E/C/E/A armor is larger than that in form of C/E/A armor; with increase in thickness of adhesive layer possessing buffer effect, damage degree of ceramic and penetrated depth of metal plate gradually decrease. The Yaziv coefficient was revised here, it was shown that under conditions of the same velocity of anti-armor piercing projectile and adhesive layer thickness, anti-penetration performance of C/E/C/E/A armor is superior to that of C/E/A one, two armors have the same surface mass density; contribution of increase in adhesive layer thickness to anti-penetration performance of the former is not large, while that to anti-penetration performance of the latter is larger; for the two ceramic armors, adhesive layer makes penetrated stress wave amplitudes be attenuated effectively, especially, for C/E/C/E/A one.
|
Received: 13 June 2018
Published: 28 June 2019
|
|
|
|
[1] 殷文骏, 程怡豪, 宋春明, 等. 弹体高速侵彻陶瓷复合厚靶的计算模型研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(1): 223-229.
YIN Wenjun, CHENG Yihao, SONG Chunming, et al. Calculation Model for a High-velocity Projectile Penetrating a Ceramic-composite Target [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(1): 223-229.
[2] 翟阳修, 吴昊, 方秦. 基于A-T模型的长杆弹超高速侵彻陶瓷靶体强度分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(3):183-188.
ZHAI Yangxiu, WU Hao, FANG Qin. Strength Analysis of Ceramic Targets Against Hypervelocity Penetration of Long-rod Projectiles Based on A-T model [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(3):183-188.
[3] Prakash A, Rajasankar J, Anandavalli N, et al. Influence of adhesive thickness on high velocity impact performance of ceramic/metal composite targets [J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2013, 41: 186-197.
[4] Übeyli M, Yıldırım R O, Ögel B. Investigation on the ballistic behavior of Al2O3/Al2024 laminated composites [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2008, 196: 356-364.
[5] 何煌, 张明, 曾首义. 连结状况对陶瓷复合装甲抗弹性能的影响[J]. 兵工自动化, 2006, 25(12): 35-37.
HE Huang, ZHANG Ming, ZENG Shou-yi. Effect of target inosculation condition on the anti-penetration property of ceramic composite armour [J]. Ordnance industry audomation, 2006, 25(12): 35-37.
[6] López-Puente J, Arias A, Zaera R, et al. The effect of the thickness of the adhesive layer on the ballistic limit of ceramic/metal armours. An experimental and numerical study [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2005, 32: 321-336.
[7] Grujicic M, Pandurangan B, d’Entremont B. The role of adhesive in the ballistic/structural performance of ceramic/polymer–matrix composite hybrid armor [J]. Materials & Design, 2012, 41:380-393.
[8] Ji G, Ouyang Z, Li G, et al. Effects of adhesive thickness on global and local Mode-I interfacial fracture of bonded joints [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2010, 47 (18-19): 2445-2458.
[9] Signetti S, Pugno N M. Evidence of optimal interfaces in bio-inspired ceramic-composite panels for superior ballistic protection [J]. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2014, 34(11): 2823-2831.
[10] Zaera R, Sánchez-Sáez S, Pérez-Castellanos J L, et al. Modelling of the adhesive layer in mixed ceramic/metal armours subjected to impact [J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2000, 31(8): 823-833.
[11] Huang C Y, Chen Y L. Design and impact resistant analysis of functionally graded Al2O3–ZrO2 ceramic composite [J]. Materials & Design, 2016, 91: 294-305.
[12] 高玉波, 张伟, 李达诚, 等. 基于反向传播神经网络的陶瓷损伤参数反演分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(1): 146-152.
GAO Yu-bo, ZHANG Wei, LI Da-cheng, et al. Reversion Analysis of Ceramic Damage Based on Back Propagation Neural Network [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(1): 146-152.
[13] Westerling L, Lundberg P, Lundberg B. Tungsten long-rod penetration into confined cylinders of boron carbide at and above ordnance velocities [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2001, 25(7): 703-714.
[14] Meyers M A. Dynamic behavior of materials [M]. University of California, San Diego, USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1994.
[15] Jinzhu L, Liansheng Z, Fenglei H. Experiments and simulations of tungsten alloy rods penetrating into alumina ceramic/603 armor steel composite targets [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2017, 101: 1-8.
[16] Rozenberg Z, Yeshurun Y. The relation between ballastic efficiency and compressive strength of ceramic tiles [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 1988, 7(3): 357-362.
[17] Gao Y, Tang T, Yi C H, Zhang W, Li D, Xie W, Huang W, Ye N. Study of static and dynamic behavior of TiB2–B4C composite [J]. Materials & Design. 2016, 92: 814-822.
|
|
|
|