结构损伤诊断不确定性方法研究进展

侯立群;赵雪峰;欧进萍;刘春城

振动与冲击 ›› 2014, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (18) : 50-58.

PDF(795 KB)
PDF(795 KB)
振动与冲击 ›› 2014, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (18) : 50-58.
论文

结构损伤诊断不确定性方法研究进展

  • 侯立群1,赵雪峰2,欧进萍2,刘春城1
作者信息 +

A Review of Nondeterministic Structural Damage Diagnosis Methods

  • HOU Li-qun1, ZHAO Xue-feng2, OU Jin-ping2,LIU Chun-cheng1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

结构损伤诊断方法经历了由确定性方法到不确定性方法的发展过程。相对于确定性方法,损伤诊断不确定性方法能更有效地考虑和应对损伤诊断过程中的不确定性干扰问题,因此已成为当前结构损伤诊断领域的研究热点。首先回顾结构损伤诊断确定性方法的研究成果和给出确定性方法面临的挑战;在此基础上,主要介绍基于概率统计和基于数据融合的两类损伤诊断不确定性方法的研究进展,并分析各种方法的优点和不足;最后阐述当前结构损伤诊断面临的挑战与亟待解决的问题,并对其发展方向进行展望。

Abstract

The structural damage diagnosis methods have been developing from deterministic methods to nondeterministic methods. Compared with the deterministic methods, the nondeterministic structural damage diagnosis methods can consider and deal with uncertainties in the process of structural damage diagnosis more effectively, therefore have gradually become the research focus in the field of structural damage diagnosis. Firstly, deterministic structural damage diagnosis methods were introduced and the challenge involved in deterministic methods was presented. On the basis of the above, two kinds of nondeterministic structural damage diagnosis methods based on probability analysis and data fusion respectively were reviewed, then the advantage and disadvantage of above methods was analyzed. Finally, the challenge and problem for the structural damage diagnosis was discussed, and the future study trend of structural damage diagnosis was forecasted.

关键词

损伤诊断 / 不确定性 / 概率 / 数据融合

Key words

damage diagnosis / uncertainty / probability / data fusion

引用本文

导出引用
侯立群;赵雪峰;欧进萍;刘春城. 结构损伤诊断不确定性方法研究进展[J]. 振动与冲击, 2014, 33(18): 50-58
HOU Li-qun;ZHAO Xue-feng;OU Jin-ping;LIU Chun-cheng. A Review of Nondeterministic Structural Damage Diagnosis Methods[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(18): 50-58

PDF(795 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/