碎屑流冲击棚洞的最大冲击力影响因素研究

PDF(2466 KB)

振动与冲击 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2) : 195-203.

论文

碎屑流冲击棚洞的最大冲击力影响因素研究

柳春1，余志祥1,2，刘宇鹏1，黄俊飞1，赵世春1,2

作者信息 +

Influential factors of the maximum impact force of rock avalanche flow on a shed tunnel

LIU Chun1,YU Zhixiang1,2,LIU Yupeng1,HUANG Junfei1,ZHAO Shichun1,2

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

棚洞是山区用于保护交通路线免受碎屑流冲击破坏的一种常见防护结构。为了研究碎屑流对棚洞最大冲击力的影响，建立了碎屑流冲击拦挡结构的DEM-FEM耦合数值模型，研究了碎屑流的整个冲击过程，分析了最大冲击力与碎屑流密度、冲击高度、坡度之间的关系，并与室内模型试验结果进行了对比，表明该耦合方法可行。研究结果表明：①耦合模型再现了碎屑流启动加速、冲击、堆积的三阶段过程，摩擦耗能是整个冲击过程中最主要的耗能方式；②最大冲击力与碎屑流密度、冲击高度和坡度依次呈线性、幂函数（指数小于1）和幂函数（指数大于1）正相关；③碎屑流的密度、冲击高度、坡度对最大冲击力的敏感度值分别为1.0，0.63和2.68，在棚洞设计时应优先考虑敏感度值大的影响参数。

Abstract

Shed tunnels are often used to protect mountain traffic routes from the impact of rock avalanche flow caused by landslides or collapses.In order to study the influential factors of the maximum impact force of rock avalanche flow on a rock shed tunnel, a coupled numerical model of a barrier structure impacted by rock avalanche flow was established based on the coupled DEM-FEM method.The effectiveness of the coupled method was verified by comparing with test results.The entire impact process was studied, and the relationships between the maximum impact force and the bulk density of rock avalanche flow, the impact height of rock avalanche flow and the slope angle were analyzed respectively.The results show that the coupled model vividly reproduces the three stages of rock avalanche flow, i.e., the initiation acceleration, impact and accumulation stage.Friction energy dissipation is the most important energy dissipation mode in the whole impact process.The maximum impact force increases linearly with the bulk density.The maximum impact force increases in the form of a power function with a power index less than 1 as the impact height increases, and increases in the form of a power function with a power index great than 1 as the slop angle increases.The sensitivity values of the bulk density, impact height, and slope angle of the rock avalanche flow to the maximum impact force are 1.0, 0.63, and 2.68, respectively.The parameters with high sensitivity should be given priority in the design of shed tunnels.

导出引用

柳春1，余志祥1,2，刘宇鹏1，黄俊飞1，赵世春1,2. 碎屑流冲击棚洞的最大冲击力影响因素研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(2): 195-203

LIU Chun1,YU Zhixiang1,2,LIU Yupeng1,HUANG Junfei1,ZHAO Shichun1,2. Influential factors of the maximum impact force of rock avalanche flow on a shed tunnel[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2020, 39(2): 195-203

参考文献

[1] Hungr O, Leroueil S, Picarelli L. The Varnes classification of landslide types, anupdate[J]. Landslides, 2014, 11(2):167-194.
[2] Xu Q, Fan XM, Huang RQ, et al. Landslide dams triggered by theWenchuan Earthquake, Sichuan Province, south west China[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2009, 68(3):373-386.
[3] Zhang Y, Guo C, Lan H, et al. Reactivation mechanism of ancient giant landslides in the tectonically active zone: a case study in Southwest China [J]. EnvironEarth Sci, 2015, 74(2):1719-1729.
[4] JW Zhou, XG Yang, TX Hou. An analysis of the supply process of loose materials to mountainous rivers and gullies as a result of dry debris avalanches [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2017, 76(13):452.
[5] CJ Ouyang, W Zhao, SM He, et al. Numerical modeling and dynamic analysis of the 2017 Xinmo landslide in Maoxian County, China [J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2017, 14 (9):1701-1711.
[6] 黄河清, 赵其华. 汶川地震诱发文家沟巨型滑坡-碎屑流基本特征及成因机制初步分析[J]. 工程地质学报, 2010, 18(2):168.
HUANG He-qing ZHAO Qi-hua. Basic characteristics and preliminary mechanism analysis of large scale rockslide-sturzstrom at Wenjiagou Triggered by Wenchuan earthquake [J]. Joumal of Eng ineering Geology, 2010, 18(2):168.
[7] 裴向军,刘洋,王东坡. 滚石冲击棚洞砂土垫层耗能缓冲机理研究[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版), 2016, 48(1): 15-22.
PEI Xiang-jun，LIU Yang，WANG Dong-po. Study on the Energy Dissipation of Sandy Soil Cushions on the rock-shed Under rockfall Impact Load [J]. JOURNAL OF SICHUAN UNIVERSITY ( ENGINEERING SCIENCE EDITION), 2016, 48(1): 15-22.
[8] 柳春, 余志祥, 郭立平, 等. 基于SPH-FEM耦合方法的落石冲击拱形钢筋混凝土棚洞数值模拟[J]. 振动与冲击, 2019, 38(13): 118-125.
LIU Chun, YU Zhixiang, GUO Liping, et al. Numerical simulation for rock-fall impacting an arch RC hangar tunnel based on SPH-FEM coupled method. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2019, 38(13): 118-125.
[9] Mommessin M, Perrotin P, Ma Y. Actions of snowavalanches on a protection gallery [J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2012, 83:20-29.
[10] S Montani, F Descoeudres, V Labiouse. Experimental study of rock sheds impacted by rock blocks [J]. Structural Engineering International, 1996, 6(3): 171-175.
[11] Kishi N, Konno H. Numerical analysis model for three layer absorbing system under falling weight impact loading [J]. JSCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 2003, 49(A): 1323-1332.
[12] Calvetti F. Rockfall shelters covered by granular layers: Experiments and design approach [J]. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2011, 15(sup1): 73-100.
[13] F Delhomme, M Mommessin, JP Mougin, et al. Behavior of a structurally dissipating rock-shed: experimental analysis and study of punching effects [J]. International Journal of Solids & Structures, 2005, 42(14): 4204-4219.
[14] 王爽，周晓军，罗福君，等. 拱形棚洞受落石冲击的模型试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击，2017, 36(12): 215-222.
WANG Shuang, ZHOU Xiao-jun, LUO Fu-jun, et al. An experimental study on the performance of an arch shaped shed tunnel due to the impact of rockfall [J]. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2017, 36(12): 215-222.
[15] YJ Jiang, ZZ Wang, Y Song, et al. Cushion Layer Effect on the Impact of a Dry Granular Flow Against a Curved Rock Shed [J]. Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering, 2018, 51(7):2191-2205.
[16] 刘茂. 基于弹塑性修正Hertz接触理论的落石冲击力计算方法[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2012, 23(3): 21-27.
LIU Mao. Calculation of impact force of falling rock based on elastoplastic modified hertz contact theory [J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2012, 23(3): 21-27.
[17] 王林峰, 唐红梅, 陈洪凯. 消能棚洞的落石冲击计算及消能效果研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2012, 33(5): 40-46.
WANG Lin-feng, TANG Hong-mei, CHEN Hong-kai. Study on the Calculation Method for Rockfall Impact and Energy Dissipation Effect of Energy Dissipation Shed Tunnel [J]. CHINA RAILWAY SCIENCE, 2012, 33(5): 40-46.
[18] S Kawahara, T Muro. Effects of dry density and thickness of sandy soil on impact response due to rockfall [J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 2006, 43(3): 329-340.
[19] 铁道第二勘测设计院.铁路工程设计技术手册•隧道[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,1999,141-191.
Second Survey and Design Institute of railways engineering technical manual-tunnel [M]. Beijing: China railway Publishing House, 1999: 141-191.
[20] Hungr O.. A model for the runout analysis of rapid flow slides, debris flows, and avalanches [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1995, 32(4): 610-623.
[21] Liang H, He S, Lei X, et al. Dynamic process simulation of construction solid waste(CSW) landfill landslide based on SPH considering dilatancy effects [J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,2017,(2): 1-15.
[22] Leonardi A, Wittel FK, Mendoza M, et al. Particle-fluid- structure interaction for debris flow impact on flexible barriers [J]. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2016, 31(5):323-333.
[23] Kwan JSH, Koo RCH, Ng CWW. Landslide mobility analysis for design of multiple debris-resisting barriers[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2015, 52(9):1345-1359.
[24] Li XP, Wu Y, He SM et al. Application of the material point method to simulate the post-failure run out processes of the Wangjiayan landslide[J]. Engineering Geology, 2016, 212:1-9.
[25] Chia-Ming Lo, Ching-Fang Lee, Ming-Lang Lin. Consideration of the Maximum Impact Force Design for the Rock-ShedSlab [J]. Journal ofGeography & Natural Disasters, 2016, 6(2).DOI: 10.4172/2167-0587
[26] BI Yu-Zhang, HE Si-Ming, LI Xin-Po, et al. Geo-engineered buffer capacity of two-layered absorbing system under the impact of rock avalanches based on Discrete Element Method [J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2016, 13(5):917-929.
[27] YZ Bi, YJ Du, SM He, et al. Numerical analysis of effect of baffle configuration on impact force exerted from rock avalanches [J]. Landslides, 2018, (3):1-15.
[28] PA Cundall. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies, numerical model for granular assemblies. Geothechnique [J]. 2008, 29 (30): 331-336.
[29] Canelli L, Ferrero A, Migliazza M, Segalini A. Debris flow risk mitigation by the means of rigid and flexible barriers experimental tests and impact analysis [J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 2012; 12 (5): 1693- 1699.
[30] A Albaba, S Lambert, F Kneib, et al. DEM Modeling of a Flexible Barrier Impacted by a Dry Granular Flow [J]. Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering, 2017 (5): 1-20.
[31] N Karajan, Z Han, H Teng et al. On the Parameter Estimation for the Discrete-Element Method in LS-DYNA® [J]. 13th International LS-DYNA User Conference.
[32] LS-DANY Theroy Manual. 07/22/17(r:8697): LS-DYNA Dev.
[33] YJ Jiang, I Towhata. Experimental Study of Dry Granular Flow and Impact Behavior Against a Rigid Retaining Wall [J]. Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering, 2013, 46(4):713-729.
[34] Adrian Jensen, Kirk Fraser, George Laird. Improving the Precision of Discrete Element Simulations through Calibration Models [J].13th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, 2014.
[35] AQ Bhatti, S Khatoon, A Mehmood, et al. Numerical study for impact resistant design of full scale arch type reinforced concrete structures under falling weight impact test [J]. Journal of Vibration & Control, 2011, 18(9): 1275-1283.
[36] Kwan, J.S.H.. Supplementary technical guidance on design of rigid debris-resistingbarriers. Technical Note No.TN 2/2012. Geotech. Eng. Off (Civil Engineering andDevelopment Department, The HKSAR Government), 2012.
[37] 章光，朱维申. 参数敏感性分析与试验方案优化 [J]. 岩土力学, 1993 (1) :51-58.
Guang Zhang，Weishen Zhun. Parameter sensitivity analysis and test scheme optimization [J]. Rock and soil mechanics, 1993(1): 51-58.