考虑多次余震作用的地下结构抗震性能研究

PDF(3856 KB)

振动与冲击 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (17) : 70-77.

论文

考虑多次余震作用的地下结构抗震性能研究

王建宁1，2，3，张广宇4，徐建2，潘鹏1，庄海洋4

作者信息 +

Aseismic performance of underground structure considering multiple aftershocks

WANG Jianning1,2,3, ZHANG Guangyu4, XU Jian2, PAN Peng1, ZHUANG Haiyang4

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

一次强地震过后通常伴有多次余震发生，结构在历次地震中的损伤累计会降低其面临再一次强震作用时的安全储备。针对地下结构抗震设计与性能提升不考虑多次余震影响的现实情况，以1995年日本阪神地震中的大开地铁站为原型，选取含有多次余震的真实主余震记录，对比研究了多次余震作用、地震单独作用以及仅考虑最大峰值加速度（PGA）余震与主震构成主余震序列等3种不同工况下的结构地震响应特征。结果表明：余震作用对地下结构造成的地震损伤通常要比仅考虑单次地震激励时严重，余震强度较小时该现象不明显；在多次余震作用下，结构的峰值位移大于或等于相应单独地震的激励结果，但小于各单独地震的累计值；中柱的残余变形随余震次数的增多呈现出一定增大趋势，这将不利于结构的震后修复工作。

Abstract

Multiple aftershocks generally occur following a significant earthquake in a short time. When faced with aftershocks, the seismic safety reserve of underground structures will be reduced due to the accumulation of previous earthquake damages. At present, the influence of multiple aftershocks is ignored in the seismic design and performance improvement of underground structures. In this paper, the Daikai subway station during the 1995 Osaka-Kobe Earthquake was taken as the prototype and a nonlinear numerical model of soil-underground structure interaction was established based on Abaqus software. Real seismic records containing multiple aftershocks were selected and used to compare the seismic response characteristics of underground structures subjected to different earthquakes, including multiple aftershocks, single earthquake case and main shock-aftershock sequence. The results show that the seismic damage to underground structure caused by aftershocks is more serious than that caused by single earthquake excitation, and this result is not obvious when the aftershock intensity is small. The peak displacement of structures for the action of multiple aftershocks is equal or higher than that for the corresponding single earthquakes, but less than the cumulative value of a single earthquake. Moreover, the residual displacement of the middle column increases with the number of aftershocks, which is not conducive to post-earthquake structural repair.

导出引用

王建宁1，2，3，张广宇4，徐建2，潘鹏1，庄海洋4. 考虑多次余震作用的地下结构抗震性能研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2023, 42(17): 70-77

WANG Jianning1,2,3, ZHANG Guangyu4, XU Jian2, PAN Peng1, ZHUANG Haiyang4. Aseismic performance of underground structure considering multiple aftershocks[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2023, 42(17): 70-77

参考文献

[1] 李宏男, 肖诗云, 霍林生. 汶川地震震害调查与启示[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2008, 29(4): 10–19. LI Hongnan, XIAO Shiyun, HUO Linsheng. Damage investigation and analysis of engineering structures in the Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2008, 29(4): 10–19.
[2] Fang L H, Wu J P, Wang W L, et al. Relocation of the mainshock and aftershock sequences of MS7.0 Sichuan Lushan earthquake[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2013, 58(Z2): 3451–3459.
[3] Zheng Y, Ni S D, Xie Z J, et al. Strong aftershocks in the northern segment of the Wenchuan earthquake rupture zone and their seismotectonic implications[J]. Earth, Planets and Space, 2010, 62(11): 881–886.
[4] Chen X, Xiang N, Guan Z, et al. Seismic vulnerability assessment of tall pier bridges under mainshock-aftershock- like earthquake sequences using vector-valued intensity measure[J]. Engineering Structures, 2022, 253: 113732.
[5] 金爱云, 王进廷, 潘坚文. 基于主余震序列的高拱坝极限抗震能力损失研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(3): 82－89. JIN Aiyun, WANG Jinting, PAN Jianwen. Ultimate seismic capacity loss of high arch dam based on mainshock- aftershock sequences[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41(3): 82－89.
[6] Lu X Z, Cheng Q L, Xu Z, et al. Regional seismic-damage prediction of buildings under mainshock-aftershock sequence[J]. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2021, 8(1): 122–134.
[7] Raghunandan M, Liel A B, Luco N. Aftershock collapse vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete frame structures[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2014, 44(3): 419–439.
[8] 杨先霖, 贾明明, 吕大刚. 主余震作用下RC框架–剪力墙结构的多源概率地震需求分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2020, 41(S2): 36–43. YANG Xianlin, JIA Mingming, LU Dagang. Multi-variate probabilistic seismic demand analysis of RC frame-shear wall structures under mainshock-aftershock sequences[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2020, 41(S2): 36–43.
[9] Wen W, Ji D, Chen Z, et al. Damage spectra of the mainshock-aftershock ground motions at soft soil sites[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 115: 815–825.
[10] Yu X H, Li S, Lv D G, et al. Collapse capacity of inelastic single-degree-of-freedom systems subjected to mainshock- aftershock earthquake sequences, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 24(5): 803–826.
[11] Konstandakopoulou F D, Beskou N D, Hatzigeorgiou G D. Three-dimensional nonlinear response of utility tunnels under single and multiple earthquakes[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 143: 106607.
[12] Sun B, Zhang S, Deng M, et al. Nonlinear dynamic analysis and damage evaluation of hydraulic arched tunnels under mainshock-aftershock ground motion sequences[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 98: 103321.
[13] Given J W, Wallace T C, Kanamori H. Teleseismic analysis of the 1980 Mammoth Lakes earthquake sequence[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1982, 72(4): 1093–1109.
[14] Ma C, Lu D C, Du X L, et al. Structural components functionalities and failure mechanism of rectangular underground structures during earthquakes[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 119: 265–280.
[15] Iida H, Hiroto T, Yoshida N, et al. Damage to Daikai subway station. Soils and Foundations, 1996: 283–300.
[16] Hashash Y M A, Hook J J, Schmidt B, et al. Seismic design and analysis of underground structures[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2001(16): 247–293.
[17] Wang J, Ma G, Zhuang H, et al. Influence of diaphragm wall on seismic responses of large unequal-span subway station in liquefiable soils[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 91: 102988.
[18] GB/T 51336－2018 地下结构抗震设计标准[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2018. GB/T 51336－2018 Standard for seismic design of underground structures[S]. Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 2018.
[19] Xu Z G, Du X L, Xu C S, et al. Numerical research on seismic response characteristics of shallow buried rectangular underground structure[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 116: 242–252.
[20] 王建宁, 付继赛, 庄海洋, 等. 可液化场地中复杂异跨地铁地下车站结构的地震反应分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(7): 170－179. WANG Jianning, FU Jisai, ZHUANG Haiyang, et al. Seismic responses analysis of complex subway station structure with unequal-span in liquefiable foundation[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2020, 39(7): 170－179.
[21] Tsinidis G, Rovithis E, Pitilakis K, et al. Seismic response of box-type tunnels in soft soil: Experimental and numerical investigation[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 59: 199-214.
[22] Lee J, Fenves G L. Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1998, 124(8): 892–900.
[23] Lubliner J, Oliver J, Oller S, et al. A plastic-damage model for concrete[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1989, 25(3): 299–326.
[24] 赵丁凤, 阮滨, 陈国兴, 等. 基于Davidenkov骨架曲线模型的修正不规则加卸载准则与等效剪应变算法及其验证[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(5): 888－895. ZHAO Ding-feng, RUAN Bin, CHEN Guo-xing, et al. Validation of modified irregular loading-unloading rules based on Davidenkov skeleton curve and its equivalent shear strain algorithm implemented in ABAQUS[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(5): 888－895.