应用MR阻尼器的连续梁桥地震损伤控制方法

摘要
图/表
参考文献(21)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (859 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要基于地震作用下连续梁桥的损伤破坏机理，利用MR阻尼器控制元件，建立了基于桥墩广义水平刚度比的阻尼器出力方案，提出了连续梁桥的非线性地震损伤控制方法。对某一联三跨连续梁桥进行地震损伤控制研究，采用IDA（Increasing Dynamic Analysis）方法对控制前后桥梁结构进行损伤分析，结果表明所提出的控制方法可以有效降低桥梁损伤，并使桥墩损伤趋于均匀，显著提高桥梁的抗震性能；对采用不同控制方案和不同设计传递系数的桥梁进行地震损伤分析，结果表明半主动控制方案对墩梁残余位移和桥墩损伤的控制效果优于PON（Passive On）控制，并且设计传递系数对控制效果影响较大，需合理选用。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	陈宇1
	石运东2
	吕杨3
	黄信1

关键词 ：连续梁桥, 半主动控制, 阻尼器, 地震损伤

Abstract：Based on the damage mechanism of continuous girder bridge under earthquake, the damper output scheme based on generalized horizontal stiffness ratio of pier was established by using MR damper control element, and the nonlinear seismic damage control method of continuous girder bridge was proposed. The damage control of a 3-span continuous girder bridge was studied, and the increasing dynamic analysis (IDA) method was used to do its damage analysis before and after the bridge was controlled by MR dampers. The results showed that the proposed control method can effectively reduce the bridge damage, make the bridge pier damage tend to be uniform, and significantly improve the aseismic performance of the bridge; seismic damage analyses of bridges with different control schemes and different design transfer coefficients reveal the semi-active control scheme is better than the PON (passive on) control scheme in controlling residual displacement of pier beam and pier damage; the design transfer coefficient has a larger influence on control effect, so it should be chosen reasonably.

Key words： continuous girder bridge semi-active control damper seismic damage

收稿日期: 2019-09-11 出版日期: 2021-02-15

引用本文:

陈宇1，石运东2，吕杨3，黄信1. 应用MR阻尼器的连续梁桥地震损伤控制方法[J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(3): 103-108.
CHEN Yu1, SHI Yundong2, L Yang3, HUANG Xin1. Seismic damage control method of continuous girder bridge with MR dampers. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2021, 40(3): 103-108.

链接本文:

http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V40/I3/103

[1] Priestley M J N. Seismic design and retrofit of bridges[M]. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1996: 8-9.
[2] Comartin C D, Greene M, Tubbesing S K. The Hyogo-Ken Nanbu Earthquake Reconnaissance Report[J]. Rep. No. 95, 1995, 4.
[3] Hung J J. Chi-Chi earthquake induced landslides in Taiwan[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology, 2000, 2(2): 25-33.
[4] Norton J A, King A B, Bull D K, et al. Northridge earthquake reconnaissance report[J]. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 1994, 27(4): 235-344.
[5] Lee T Y, Chen P C. Experimental and analytical study of sliding mode control for isolated bridges with MR dampers[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 15(4): 564-581.
[6] Dyke S J, Spencer Jr B F, Sain M K, et al. Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 1996, 5(5): 565.
[7] Stanway R, Sproston J L, Stevens N G. Non-linear identification of an electrorheological vibration damper[C]//IFAC Identification and System Parameter Estimation. 1985, 7: 195-200.
[8] Spencer B F, Dyke S J, Sain M K, et al. Phenomenological model for magnetorheological dampers[J]. Journal of engineering mechanics, 1997, 123(3): 230-238.
[9] Li Z X, Xu L H. Performance tests and hysteresis model of MRF-04K damper[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, 2005, 131(8): 1303-1306.
[10] Tzou H S, Chai W K. Design and testing of a hybrid polymeric electrostrictive/piezoelectric beam with bang-bang control[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2007, 21(1): 417-429.
[11] Dyke S J, Spencer Jr B F, Sain M K, et al. An experimental study of MR dampers for seismic protection[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 1998, 7(5): 693.
[12] Bitaraf M, Ozbulut O E, Hurlebaus S, et al. Application of semi-active control strategies for seismic protection of buildings with MR dampers[J]. Engineering Structures, 2010, 32(10): 3040-3047.
[13] Yang M G, Chen Z Q, Hua X G. An experimental study on using MR damper to mitigate longitudinal seismic response of a suspension bridge[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 31(8): 1171-1181.
[14] Sahasrabudhe S S, Nagarajaiah S. Semi-active control of sliding isolated bridges using MR dampers: an experimental and numerical study[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2005, 34(8): 965-983.
[15] Lin W, Li Z X, Ding Y. Trust-region based instantaneous optimal semi-active control of long-span spatially extended structures with MRF-04K damper[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2008, 7(4): 447-464.
[16] 吕杨, 徐龙河, 李忠献, 等. 磁流变阻尼器优化设计及地震损伤控制[J]. 工程力学, 2012, 29(8): 94-100.
Lv Yang, Xu Longhe, Li Zhongxian, et al. Optimal design of MR dampers and seismic damage control of structures[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2012, 29(8): 94-100. (in Chinese).
[17] 阎石, 宁欣, 王宁伟. 磁流变阻尼器在受控结构中的优化布置[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2004, 24(3): 175-178.
Yan Shi, Ning Xin, Wang Ningwei. Optimal placement of MR damper set in structures[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2004, 24(3): 175-178. (in Chinese)
[18] 张延年, 李宏男. 混合控制结构的多维动力分析与优化设计[J]. 土木工程学报, 2007, 40(8): 8-15.
Zhang Yannian, Li Hongnan. Structural hybrid control with MRD and sliding base-isolation under bi-directional earthquakes[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2007, 40(8): 8-15. (in Chinese)
[19] 李忠献, 陈宇, 李宁. 基于材料损伤的钢筋混凝土构件损伤模型[J]. 工程力学, 2014, 31(6):53-59.
Li Zhongxian, Chen Yu, Li Ning. A damage model for reinforced concrete member based on material damage[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 31(6):53-59. (in Chinese)
[20] Li Z X, Lv Y, Xu L H, et al. Experimental studies on nonlinear seismic control of a steel-concrete hybrid structure using MR dampers[J]. Engineering Structures, 2013, 49: 248-263.
[21] Li Z, Hatzigeorgiou G D. Seismic damage analysis of RC structures using fiber beam-column elements. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 32(1): 103-110.