Syntactic foam with fly ash cenospheres as the main component has high specific strength and specific energy absorption, showing its great application potential in lightweight impact resistant structures and buffer protection.However, the influence mechanism of the factors such as the fly ash cenosphere size and the reinforcement on the mechanical properties and behaviors is still unclear.In addition, the mechanical model of this kind of syntactic foam has not yet been constructed in current studies, which is not conducive to the material selection and numerical simulation related work in structural design.With regards to this, a series of quasi-static compression experimental studies were conducted about the influence of the fly ash cenospheres size and the honeycomb aluminum reinforcement on the mechanical properties and deformation behaviors of cenospheres polyurethane syntactic foams (CPSFs).Meanwhile, the mechanical model of CPSFs was constructed according to the Avalle theory.The results are as follows: ① When the relative density is less than 0.29, the size of the cenosphere has little effect on the mechanical properties of the composite foam.When the relative density is greater than 0.29, the effect of the cenosphere size on the mechanical properties of the composite foam increases as the density increases.② For the composite foam containing reinforcing phase, the mechanical properties of the composite foam containing small-sized cenospheres are significantly improved.The additional reinforcement effect of the aluminum honeycomb is more obvious for the composite foam containing small-sized floating beads.This reinforcement mechanism is mainly to change the initial failure mode of the material from shear to axial crushing.③ The results by the constitutive model constructed according to the Avalle theory, the fitting of the stress platform stage and the energy dissipation characteristics are consistent with the experimental results, and the basic mechanical properties of the material can be predicted more accurately.The study provides a theoretical reference and a basic prediction model for the comprehensive utilization of fly ash and promotes the application of its composite foam in the design of lightweight impact-resistant structures.
[1]许金余, 李为民, 范飞林,等.地质聚合物混凝土的冲击力学性能研究[J].振动与冲击, 2009,28(1): 46-49.
XU Jinyu, LI Weimin, FAN Feilin, et al.Study on mechanical properties of geopolymeric concrete under impact loading [J].Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2009,28(1): 46-49.
[3]RAJA R S, MANISEKAR K, MANIKANDAN V.Study on mechanical properties of fly ash impregnated glass fiber reinforced polymer composites using mixture design analysis [J].Materials and Design, 2014, 55(3):499-508.
[4]VISHWAKARMA A, MONDAL D P, BIRLA S,et al.Effect of cenosphere size on the dry sliding wear behavior LM13-cenosphere syntactic foam [J].Tribology International, 2017, 110: 8-22.
[5]CAI X H,HE Z, TANG S W,et al.Abrasion erosion characteristics of concrete made with moderate heat Portland cement, fly ash and silica fume using sand blasting test [J].Construction and Building Materials,2016,127(30): 804-814.
[6]GOEL M D, MONDAL D P, YADAV M S, et al.Effect of strain rate and relative density on compressive deformation behavior of aluminum cenosphere syntactic foam [J].Materials Science & Engineering A, 2014,590(1): 406-415.
[7]王壮壮,徐鹏,范志强, 等.粉煤灰聚氨酯复合泡沫静动态力学特性实验研究[J].振动与冲击,2020,39(4): 229-235.
WANG Zhuangzhuang, XU Peng, FAN Zhiqiang, et al.An experimental study on mechanical characteristics of fly ash cenosphere polyurethane syntactic foam under quasi-static and dynamic compression [J].Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2020, 39(4): 229-235.
[8]SHUNMUGASAMY V C, GUPTA N, NGUYEN N Q.Strain rate dependence of damage evolution in syntactic foams [J].Materials Science and Engineering A, 2010, 527(23): 6166-6177.
[9]HUSSEIN R D, DONG R, LU G, et al.Crushing response of square aluminum tubes filled with polyurethane foam and aluminum honeycomb [J].Thin-walled Structures,2017,110(1):140-154.
[11]ALDOSHAN A, KHANNA S.Effect of relative density on the dynamic compressive behavior of carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum foam [J].Materials Science and Engineering A, 2017(689): 17-24.
[12]GUPTA N, YE R, PORFIRI M.Comparison of tensile and compressive characteristics of vinyl ester/glass microballoon syntactic foams [J].Composites Part B, 2010(41): 236-245.
[13]RUSCH K C. Energy-absorbing characteristics of foamed polymers [J].Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1970,14(6):1433 -1447.
[14]LIU Q,SUBHASH G.A phenomenological constitutive model for foams under large deformations [J].Polymer Engineering and Science, 2004, 44(3):463-473.
[15]AVALLE M, BELINGARDI G , IBBA A .Mechanical models of cellular solids: parameters identification from experimental tests [J].International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2007, 34(1):3-27.
[16]GIBSON L J, ASHBY M F.Cellular solids: structure and properties [M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.