P波与SV波斜入射下岩体隧道洞口段地震响应分析

摘要
图/表
参考文献(20)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (2242 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要当通过人工边界转换方法模拟静动力耦合效应时，既有耦合边界模拟方法存在使模型位移场变化较大的问题，影响地震波斜入射下隧道结构地震响应分析结果的准确性。本文提出了一种基于多次静力分析的人工边界转换改进方法，使有限元模型动力分析的初始状态与静力分析的应力状态、位移场均一致，实现了静动力联合分析。采用黏弹性边界结合等效荷载的外源波动输入方法，基于ABAQUS软件建立斜入射P波与SV波下的数值地震分析模型，通过算例验证模型与所提方法的可靠性。进行一系列非线性时程分析，对比分析了P波与SV波分别斜入射对隧道衬砌结构地震响应的影响规律。结果表明：该方法可以保证隧道静动力边界转换前后位移的一致性；随着入射角度的增加，P波作用下，结构水平加速度先增大后减小，竖向加速度呈递减趋势，而SV波作用下，水平和竖向加速度均呈增大趋势；当入射角大于20°时，相较于P波斜入射，SV波斜入射下隧道拱肩、拱脚处的应力水平更高；隧道结构在斜入射SV波下的损伤程度高于斜入射P波。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张懂懂1
	刘洋2
	熊峰1
	梅竹2
	李爽3

关键词 ：岩体隧道, P波, SV波, 人工边界转换, 入射角度

Abstract：The existing coupling boundary simulation method has the problem that the displacement field of the model changes greatly, which affects the accuracy of the seismic response analysis results of tunnel structures under oblique incidence of seismic waves, while the static-dynamic coupling effect is simulated by artificial boundary transformation method. In this paper, an improved method of artificial boundary transformation using repeated static analysis is proposed, which makes the initial state of dynamic analysis of finite element model consistent with the stress state and displacement field of static analysis, and the static-dynamic coupling analysis is realized. A numerical seismic analysis model under oblique incident P wave and SV wave was established using ABAQUS software. The reliability of the model and method was verified through an example. A series of nonlinear time-history analysis were carried out, and the influences of oblique incidence of P wave and SV wave on the seismic response of tunnel lining structure were compared and analyzed. The results show that the consistency of displacement displacement field of tunnel can be ensured in the transformation of artificial boundary by the method. With the increment of the incident angle, the horizontal acceleration of the structure first increases and then decreases. While the vertical acceleration shows a decreasing trend under the action of P wave. Under the action of SV wave, both the horizontal acceleration and the vertical acceleration show an increasing trend. When the incident angle is larger than 20°, compared with P wave oblique incidence, the stress level of arch shoulder and arch foot under SV wave oblique incidence is higher; The damage degree of tunnel structure under oblique incident SV wave is higher than that under oblique incident P wave.

Key words： rock tunnel P wave SV wave transformation of artificial boundaries incident angle

收稿日期: 2022-01-18 出版日期: 2022-12-28

引用本文:

张懂懂1，刘洋2，熊峰1，梅竹2，李爽3. P波与SV波斜入射下岩体隧道洞口段地震响应分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(24): 278-286.
ZHANG Dongdong1, LIU Yang2, XIONG Feng1, MEI Zhu2, LI Shuang3. Seismic response analysis of rock tunnel near-portal under oblique incidence of P wave and SV wave. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2022, 41(24): 278-286.

链接本文:

http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/Y2022/V41/I24/278

[1] WANG W L, WANG T T, SU J J, et al. Assessment of damage in mountain tunnels due to the Taiwan Chi-Chi Earthquake[J]. Pergamon, 2001, 16(3):133-150.
[2] YASHIRO K, KOJIMA Y, SHIMIZU M. Historical Earthquake Damage to Tunnels in Japan and Case Studies of Railway Tunnels in the 2004 Niigataken-Chuetsu Earthquake[J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI, 2007, 48(3):136-141.
[3] 崔光耀，刘维东，倪嵩陟，等. 汶川地震各地震烈度区公路隧道震害特征研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2014, 51(6): 1-6.
CUI Guangyao，LIU Weidong，NI Songzhi，et al．Study on different seismic intensities and earthquake damage to highway tunnels in Wenchuan area affected by earth-quakes [J]. Modern Tunnel Technology, 2014, 51 (6): 1-6.
[4] 李天斌. 汶川特大地震中山岭隧道变形破坏特征及影响因素分析[J]. 工程地质学报, 2008, 16(6): 742-750.
LI Tianbin. Failure characteristics and influence factor analysis of mountain tunnels at epicenter zones of Great Wenchuan Earthquake [J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2008, 16(6): 742-750
[5] 刘晶波，吕彦东. 结构-地基动力相互作用问题分析的一种直接方法[J]. 土木工程学报, 1998, 31(3): 55-64.
LIU Jingbo, LU Yandong. A direct method for analysis of dynamic soil-structure interaction [J]. Journal of Civil Engineering, 1998, 31(3): 55-64.
[6] 杜修力，陈维，李亮，等. 斜入射条件下地下结构时域地震反应分析初探[J]. 震灾防御技术, 2007, 2(3): 290-296.
DU Xiuli, CHEN Wei, LI Liang, et al. Preliminary study of time-domain seismic response for underground structures to obliquely incident seismic waves [J]. Earthquake Disaster Prevention Technology, 2007, 2(3): 290-296.
[7] 黄景琦，杜修力，田志敏，等. 斜入射SV波对地铁车站地震响应的影响[J]. 工程力学, 2014, 31(9): 81-88.
HUANG Jingqi，DU Xiuli，TIAN Zhimin，et al．Effect of the oblique incidence of seismic SV waves on the seismic response of subway station structure [J]. Engineering Mechanic, 2014, 31( 9) : 81-88．
[8] 周晓洁，张越宇，何颖，等. 地震SV波斜入射下沉管隧道的地震响应分析[J]. 地震工程学报, 2017, 39(04): 600-608.
ZHOU Xiaojie, ZHANG Yueyu, HE Ying, et al. Seismic response analysis of immersed tunnel under oblique incidence of seismic SV waves [J]. Chinese Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 39(04): 600-608.
[9] LYU D, MA S, YU C, et al. Effects of oblique incidence of SV waves on nonlinear seismic response of a lined arched tunnel[J]. Shock and Vibration. 2020, 2020（8093804）：1–12.
[10] 巴振宁，喻志颖，梁建文. 山岭隧洞在平面P-SV波入射下的地震动力响应[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2018, 38(5): 50-58.
BA Zhenning, YU Zhiying, LIANG Jianwen. Dynamic response of a mountain tunnel under plane P- SV waves [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2018, 38 (5): 50-58.
[11] 王飞，宋志强，卢韬. 近断层地震动斜输入下水电站厂房非线性地震响应研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(5): 63-73.
WANG Fei, SONG Zhiqiang, LU Tao. Nonlinear seismic responses of a hydropower house under near-fault ground motions oblique input [J]. Vibration and Shock, 2020,39 (5): 63-73.
[12] 姚增，丁梧秀. 大柳树岩体地震纵横波破坏效应与震后变形参数特征[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版). 1997, 33(02): 103-107.
The Destructive Effect of S-P Wave of Earthquake and The Character of Deformation Parameter in the Rockmass of Daliushu [J]. Journal of Lanzhou University(Natural Sciences)，1997, 33(02): 103-107.
[13] 高峰，赵冯兵. 地下结构静-动力分析中的人工边界转换方法研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2011, 30(11): 165-170.
GAO Feng, ZHAO Fengbing. Study on transformation method for artificial boundaries in static-dynamic analysis of underground structure [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2011, 30(11): 165-170.
[14] 王苏，路德春，杜修力. 地下结构地震破坏静-动力耦合模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(11): 3483-3488.
WANG Su, LU Dechun, DU Xiuli. Research on underground structure seismic damage using static-dynamic coupling simulation method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(11): 3483-3488.
[15] LYSMER J, KUHLEMEYER R L. Finite dynamic model for infinite media [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics. 1969, 95(4): 859-878.
[16] DEEKS AJ, RANDOLPH MF. Axisymmetrical time-domain transmitting boundaries[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics-ASCE. 1994, 120(1): 25-42.

[17] 杜修力，赵密，王进廷. 近场波动模拟的人工应力边界条件[J]. 力学学报, 2006, 38(1): 49-56.
DU Xiuli, ZHAO Mi, Wang Jinting. A stress artificial boundary in FEA for near-field wave problem [J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanics, 2006, 38(1): 49-56.
[18] 赵建锋，杜修力，韩强，等. 外源波动问题数值模拟的一种实现方式[J]. 工程力学, 2007, 24(4): 52-58.
ZHAO Jianfeng, DU Xiuli, HAN Qiang，et al．An approach to numerical simulation for external source wave motion［J］．Engineering Mechanic，2007, 24(4): 52-58.
[19] 王飞，宋志强，刘云贺，等. SV波斜入射不同自由场构建方法下水电站地面厂房地震响应研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(7): 9-18.
WANG Fei, SONG Zhiqiang, LIU Yunhe, et al. Seismic response of ground powerhouse of hydropower station based on different free field construction methods with oblique incidence of SV wave [J]. Vibration and Shock, 2021,40 (7): 9-18.
[20] 廖振鹏，刘晶波. 离散网格中的弹性波动(Ⅰ) [J]. 地震工程与工程振动. 1986, 6(2): 1-16.
LIAO Zhenpeng, LIU Jingbo. Elastic wave motion in discrete grids [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1986, 6 (2): 1-16.