一种新型引磁式磁流变阻尼器研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献(38)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (3094 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要针对特定结构限制下磁流变阻尼器工作性能的优化问题，在传统磁流变阻尼器的基础上设计了一种新型引磁式磁流变阻尼器，建立了磁场与流场耦合动力学模型；以输出阻尼力和动态可调系数为优目标函数，基于多目标遗传算法对该型磁流变阻尼器内部活塞进行了优化；建立了多物理场耦合模型并进行了仿真和冲击试验。仿真结果表明：在相同外形尺寸条件下，新型磁流变阻尼器的有效阻尼通道长度为64 mm，相比普通磁流变阻尼器提高了60%；新型磁流变阻尼器的力学特性与动态可调性更加优越，当施加2.0 A电流、活塞运动速度为0.09 m/s时，新型磁流变阻尼器的输出阻尼力为55.9 kN,相比普通磁流变阻尼器(32.4 kN)提高了72.5%；施加不同大小电流时新型磁流变阻尼器的峰值压力与吸能容量均明显高于普通磁流变阻尼器。冲击试验结果表明：当施加2.0 A的电流、冲击速度为2.45 m/s时，相比普通磁流变阻尼器，其峰值压力达到11.64 MPa、峰值压力提高约41%。峰值压力试验结果与仿真结果对比表明：仿真结果和试验结果的趋势是一致的，其相对误差在0.1之内,表明了仿真模型的有效性。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王成龙1
	吴鲁杰1
	魏学谦2
	曾庆良1

关键词 ：磁流变液, 磁流变阻尼器, 多物理场耦合, 冲击试验

Abstract：A new magneto-inducible MR damper was proposed on the basis of the conventional MR damper to solve the problem that the performance of the traditional magnetorheological damper was limited under certain size of structure, and the coupling dynamics model of the magnetic field and the flow field was established. Taking the damping force and the dynamic adjustable coefficient as the optimization objective functions, the structure size of internal piston of the new MR damper was optimized based on the MOGA. On this basis, the multi-physical coupling model was established, and the simulation and impact tests were carried out. The simulation results showed that the length of effective damping channel of the new MR damper is 64 mm, which was 60% higher than that of the ordinary MR damper. The mechanical properties and dynamic adaptability of the new MR damper were superior. When 2.0 A current was applied and the piston speed was 0.09 m/s, the damping force of the new MR damper was 55.9 kN, which was 72.5% higher than that of the ordinary MR damper (32.4 kN). The peak pressure and energy absorption capacity of the new MR damper were obviously higher than those of the ordinary one when different amounts of current were applied. The impact test results showed that the peak pressure reached 11.64 MPa when 2.0 A current was applied and the impact velocity was 2.45 m /s, which was about 41% higher than that of the ordinary MR damper. The comparison between the peak pressure test results and the simulation results showed that the trend of the simulation results and the test results was consistent, and the relative error was within 0.1，which indicated the effectiveness of the simulation model.

Key words： magnetorheological fluid magnetorheological damper multi-physical field coupling impact test

收稿日期: 2023-01-09 出版日期: 2024-05-28

引用本文:

王成龙1，吴鲁杰1，魏学谦2，曾庆良1. 一种新型引磁式磁流变阻尼器研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2024, 43(10): 248-259.
WANG Chenglong1,WU Lujie1,WEI Xueqian2,ZENG Qingliang1. New magneto-inducible magnetorheological damper. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2024, 43(10): 248-259.

链接本文:

http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/Y2024/V43/I10/248

[1] SUN M, LI X, ZHOU Z, et al. Analysis of damping characteristics of magnetorheological damper under impact load[J]. Materials (Basel), 2022, 15(12). [2] 廖昌荣,吴笃华,孙凌逸,等.考虑表观滑移效应的磁流变液减振器阻尼特性研究[J].中国公路学报,2017,30(06):297-3 06. LIAO Chang-rong, WU Du-hua, SUN Ling-yi, et al. Research on damping characteristics of magnetorheological fluid damper considering apparent slip boundary condition[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport,2017,30(06):297-306. [3] MAO M, HU W, CHOI Y T, et al. Experimental validation of a magnetorheological energy absorber design analysis [J]. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2013, 25(3): 352-63. [4] 左强,黄鑫芳,易锋,等.阻尼间隙可调式磁流变阻尼器设计与动力性能实验[J].农业机械学报,2022,53(01):431-440. ZUO Qiang, HUANG Xin-fang, YI Feng, et al. Structure design and dynamic performance analysis of magnetorheological damper with adjustable damping gaps[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2022,53(01):43- 440. [5] HU G, WU L, DENG Y, et al. Damping Performance Analysis of Magnetorheological Damper Based on Multiphysics Coupling[J]. Actuators, 2021, 10(8). [6] SINGH H J, HU W, WERELEY N M, et al. Experimental validation of a magnetorheological energy absorber design optimized for shock and impact loads[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2014, 23(12). [7] SINGH H J, WERELEY N M. Optimal control of gun recoil in direct fire using magnetorheological absorbers[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2014, 23(5). [8] ZHENG J, OUYANG Q, LI Z, et al. Experimental analysis of separately controlled multi-coils on the performance of magnetorheological absorber under impact loading[J]. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2015, 27(7): 887-97. [9] SHOU M, LIAO C, ZHANG H, et al. A comparative analysis of magnetorheological energy absorber models under impact conditions[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2019, 28(6). [10] YANG Y, XU Z-D, GUO Y-Q, et al. Internal magnetic field tests and magnetic field coupling model of a three-coil magnetorheological damper[J]. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2020, 31(19): 2179-95. [11] DESAI R M, ACHARYA S, JAMADAR M-E-H, et al. Synthesis of magnetorheological fluid and its application in a twin-tube valve mode automotive damper[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, 2020, 234(7): 1001-16. [12] HAN Y, DONG L, HAO C. Experimental analysis and mathematical modelling for novel magnetorheological damper design[J]. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, 2019, 59(1): 367-76. [13] ZHU Z, ZHANG X. Damping performance optimization of the magnetorheological damper with three parallel channels [J]. Structures, 2022, 44: 1962-73. [14] LI L, HU G, YU L, et al. Development and performance analysis of a new self-powered magnetorheological damper with Energy-Harvesting Capability[J]. Energies, 2021, 14(19). [15] OLIVIER M, SOHN J W. Design optimization and performance evaluation of hybrid type magnetorheological damper[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2021, 35(8): 3549-58. [16] HU G, LIAO M, LI W. Analysis of a compact annular-radial-orifice flow magnetorheological valve and evaluation of its performance[J]. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2017, 28(10): 1322-33. [17] YAN W, HUINA H, WANG X, et al. Semi‐active control of metal foam magnetorheological damper[J]. Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik, 2021, 52(12): 1355-62. [18] SINGH H J, WERELEY N M. Adaptive magnetorheological shock isolation mounts for drop-induced impacts[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2013, 22(12). [19] 刘志恩,安宏杰,宋伟志,等.基于新型磁流变阻尼器的汽车防侧翻研究[J].汽车技术,2022(04):44-49. LIU Zhi-en, AN Hong-jie, SONG Wei-zhi, et al. Research on vehicle anti-roll based on a novel MR damper[J]. Journal of automotive technology, 2022 (04): 44-49. [20] NORDIN N H D, MUTHALIF A G A, RAZALI M K M, et al. Development and implementation of energy-efficient magnetorheological fluid bypass damper for prosthetics limbs using a fuzzy-logic controller[J]. IEEE Access, 2022, 10: 18978-87. [21] LUONG Q-V, JO B-H, HWANG J-H, et al. A supervised neural network control for magnetorheological damper in an aircraft landing gear[J]. Applied Sciences, 2021, 12(1). [22] KIM B-G, YOON D-S, KIM G-W, et al. Design of a novel magnetorheological damper adaptable to low and high stroke velocity of vehicle suspension system[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(16). [23] JAMADAR M-E-H, DESAI R M, SAINI R S T, et al. Dynamic analysis of a quarter car model with semi-active seat suspension using a novel model for magneto-rheological (MR) damper[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies, 2020, 9(1): 161-76. [24] OH J-S, KIM K-S, LEE Y-S, et al. Dynamic simulation of a full vehicle system featuring magnetorheological dampers with bypass holes[J]. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2019, 31(2): 253-62. [25] GURUBASAVARAJU T M, KUMAR H, MAHALINGAM A. An approach for characterizing twin-tube shear-mode magnetorheological damper through coupled FE and CFD analysis[J]. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2018, 40(3). [26] DONG Z, FENG Z, CHEN Y, et al. Design and multiobjective optimization of magnetorheological damper considering the consistency of magnetic flux density[J]. Shock and Vibration, 2020, 2020: 1-12. [27] 王成龙,苗根远,刘延玺,等.基于磁流变缓冲的液压支架抗冲击技术研究[J].液压与气动,2021,45(06):33-40. WANG Cheng-long,MIAO Gen-yuan,LIU Yan-xi,et al.Anti shock support based on MR damper[J].Chinese Hydraulics and Pneumatics,2021,45(06):33-40. [28] SINGH H J, WERELEY N M. Adaptive magnetorheological shock isolation mounts for drop-induced impacts[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2013, 22(12). [29] 胡国良,邓英俊,冯海波,等.内置磁流变阀对磁流变阻尼器动力性能的影响 [J].交通运输工程学报,2021,21(03):289- 299. HU Guo-liang, DENG Ying-jun, FENG Hai-bo, et al. Effect of inner magnetorheological valve on dynamic performance of magnetorheological damper[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021(03):289-299. [30] 陈淑梅,汤鸿剑,黄惠,等.剪切挤压混合模式磁流变阻尼器的性能[J].华南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2021,49(02):140-150. CHEN Shu-mei, TANG Hong-jian, HUANG Hui, et al. Performance of shear-squeeze hybrid mode magnetorheological dampers[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition),2021,49 (02):140-150. [31] Wang C, Zhang J, Liu G, et al. Design and performance analysis of a double-outlet-rod magnetorheological damper for impact load[J]. Machines. 2022; 10(11):1099. [32] 侯保林,郑杰,郑鹏飞.某单缸双通道磁流变阻尼器的时间响应特性分析[J].振动与冲击,2020,39(05):177-182. HOU Bao-lin, ZHENG Jie, ZHENG Peng-fei. Time response analysis of a single-cylinder dual-channel MR damper[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock,20,39(05):177-182. [33] 胡国良,邓英俊,喻理梵,等.磁流变阻尼器多物理场耦合仿真及动力性能分析[J].磁性材料及器件,2020,51(06). HU Guo-liang, DENG Ying-jun, YU Li-fan, et al. Multiphysics coupling simulation and dynamic performance analysis of magnetorheological damper[J].Magnetic Materials and Devices,2020,51(06). [34] 胡国良,冯海波,喻理梵.内置阀式磁流变阻尼器结构设计及阻尼性能研究[J].现代制造工程,2019(12). HU Guo-liang,FENG Hai-bo,YU Li-fan. Structural design and damping performance of built-in valve magnetorheological damper[J].Modern Manufacturing Engineering,2019(12). [35] MUNYANEZA O, SOHN J W. Modeling and control of hybrid MR seat damper and whole body vibration evaluation for bus drivers[J]. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, 2021, 41(2): 659-75. [36] AI H X, WANG D H, LIAO W H. Design and Modeling of a Magnetorheological Valve with Both Annular and Radial Flow Paths[J]. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2006, 17(4): 327-34. [37] 寿梦杰,廖昌荣,叶宇浩,等.冲击载荷下磁流变缓冲器的动力学行为[J].机械工程学报,2019,55(01):72-80. SHU Mengjie, LIAO Changrong, YE Yuhao, et al. Dynamic behavior of magnetorheological buffer under shock load[J].Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2019,55(01):72-8 0. [38] ELSAADY W, OYADIJI S O, NASSER A. A one-way coupled numerical magnetic field and CFD simulation of viscoplastic compressible fluids in MR dampers[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2020, 167.