基于正交检验法的颤振分析模态跟踪技术

摘要
图/表
参考文献(14)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1943 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要模态跟踪是颤振分析的关键问题之一。常见的基于模态置信度的跟踪方法在颤振点附近常会出现错误导致跟踪失败。本文通过探究该方法的数学机理，阐明了基于模态置信度跟踪方法存在的缺陷，进而引入左特征向量，研究了一种基于正交检验法的模态跟踪技术。采用一悬臂直翼盒模型开展仿真研究，在状态空间下进行颤振分析，基于正交检验法得到其根轨迹图，并将模态跟踪结果与MAC值法进行对比，证明了正交检验法具有更好的模态跟踪效果。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：颤振, 状态空间, 特征向量, 模态跟踪, 模态置信度

Abstract：Mode tracking is one of the key problems in flutter analysis. The common method based on modal assurance criterion frequently fails near the critical point during the application. The mathematical mechanism of this method is studied in this paper, thus revealing its defects in nature. A method based on orthogonality check is discussed, which introduces the left eigenvector. The method is applied to the flutter analysis of an unswept cantilevered wing box in the state space and the root locus of the system is obtained. The numerical results are compared with those of the MAC method and validate that the orthogonality check is more effective in mode tracking.

Key words： flutter state space eigenvector mode tracking MAC

收稿日期: 2016-03-25 出版日期: 2017-09-28

引用本文:

蒋令闻1,2,杭晓晨1,2，费庆国1,2. 基于正交检验法的颤振分析模态跟踪技术[J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(19): 84-89.
JIANG Lingwen1, 2 HANG Xiaochen1, 2 FEI Qingguo1, 2. Mode tracking technique in flutter analysis based on orthogonality check. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2017, 36(19): 84-89.

链接本文:

http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/Y2017/V36/I19/84

[1] Eldred M S, Venkayya V B, Anderson W J. Mode tracking issues in structural optimization[J]. AIAA journal, 1995, 33(10): 1926-1933.
[2] 谢长川, 胡薇薇, 杨超. 颤振分析中的特征值排序问题[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2007, 37(18): 141-146.
XIE Chang-chuan, HU Wei-wei, YANG Chao. Eigenvalue sorting problem in flutter analysis[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2007, 37(18): 141-146.
[3] 吴志刚, 宋晨, 杨超. 颤振分析中的模态跟踪技术[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2010 (2): 163-167.
WU Zhi-gang, SONG Chen, YANG Chao. Mode tracking techniques in flutter analysis [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2010 (2): 163-167.
[4] Eldred M S, Venkayya V B, Anderson W J. New mode tracking methods in aeroelastic analysis[J]. AIAA journal, 1995, 33(7): 1292-1299.
[5] 任智毅, 金海波, 丁运亮. 基于气动力分段表达的颤振求解方法与模态跟踪技术的应用[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2014, 32(2): 246-251.
REN Zhi-yi, JIN Hai-bo, DING Yun-liang. Flutter analysis based on the piecewise express of aerodynamic forces and the application of mode tracking technology[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2014, 32(2): 246-251.
[6] Desforges M J, Cooper J E, Wright J R. Mode tracking during flutter testing using the modal assurance criterion[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 1996, 210(1): 27-37.
[7] Gariffo J M. Generalized Reduced Order Modeling of Aeroservoelastic Systems[D]. University of California, Los Angeles, 2013: 35-39.
[8] 管德. 飞机气动弹性力学手册[M]. 北京:航空工业出版社, 1994: 126-142.
GUAN De. Aeroelasticity handbook of aircraft[M]. Beijing Aeronautical Industry Press, 1994: 126-142.
[9] 赵永辉. 气动弹性力学与控制[M]. 科学出版社, 2007: 310-315.
ZHAO Yong-hui. Aeroelasticity and control[M]. Science Press, 2007: 310-315.
[10] Wright J R, Cooper J E, 姚一龙. 飞机气动弹性力学及载荷导论[M]. 上海交通大学出版社, 2010: 161-163.
Wright J R, Cooper J E, YAO Yi-long. Introduction to aircraft aeroelasticity and loads[M]. Shanghai Jiaotong University Press, 2010: 161-163.
[11] Daré, Afolabi, V. Pidaparti R M, et al. Flutter prediction using an eigenvector orientation approach[J]. AIAA journal, 1998, 36(1): 69-74.
[12] Bhatia K G, Rudisill C S. Optimization of complex structures to satisfy flutter requirements[J]. AIAA Journal, 1971, 9(8): 1487-1491.
[13] Striz A G, Venkayya V B. Influence of structural and aerodynamic modeling on flutter analysis[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1994, 31(5): 1205-1211.
[14] Hasan M. Multidisciplinary design and optimization of a composite wing box[D]. Middle East Technical University, 2003: 158-180.