活塞内流道磁流变减振器热耦合阻尼特性分析

摘要
图/表
参考文献(16)
相关文章 (10)

全文: PDF (1398 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要模拟研究了采用横向工作间隙的活塞内流道磁流变减振器（MRD）在热平衡状态下的阻尼特性。基于AMESim分析了汽车以不同速度在不同路面行驶时缸筒内流体达到热平衡的温度；模拟活塞振动并耦合热平衡温度从流体的角度计算了MRD的示功曲线；通过恒温加热模拟减振器的热平衡温度在振动试验台上对MRD的阻尼特性进行了测试。结果显示，汽车的行驶速度对减振器的阻尼性能有影响，当车速为40km/h、70km/h、110km/h时，MRD的阻尼性能分别下降了9.4%、16.67%、20.69%。测试结果与仿真结果基本吻合。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	朱石沙1
	黄鹏程2
	唐利波3
	章岱2

关键词 ： MRD, 热耦合, 热平衡, 阻尼特性

Abstract：The damping characteristics of the magnetorheological damper (MRD) with the inner working clearance of the piston in the thermal equilibrium are studied.The temperature of the fluid in the vehicle’s cylinder at various speeds on various road surfaces was analyzed based on the AMESim.The power curve of MRD was calculated from the angle of fluid by simulating piston vibration and coupling thermal equilibrium temperature.The damping characteristics of MRD were tested on a vibration test bed by means of constant temperature heating simulation of the thermal equilibrium temperature of the shock absorber.The results show that the vehicle’s driving speed influences the shock absorber’s damping performance.When the vehicle speed is 40 km/h, 70 km/h, and 110 km/h, the MRD’s damping performance is decreased by 9.4%, 16.67% and 20.69%, respectively.The test results are basically consistent with the simulation results.

Key words： MRD thermal coupling thermal equilibrium damping characteristics

收稿日期: 2017-03-07 出版日期: 2018-08-15

引用本文:

朱石沙1，黄鹏程2，唐利波3，章岱2. 活塞内流道磁流变减振器热耦合阻尼特性分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2018, 37(16): 172-176.
ZHU Shisha1,HUANG Pengcheng2,TANG Libo3,ZHANG Dai2. A study on thermal coupling damping characteristics of magnetorheological dampers with inner channels. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2018, 37(16): 172-176.

链接本文:

http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/Y2018/V37/I16/172

[1] 朱姗姗,李德才,崔红超,等.空间飞行器磁性液体阻尼减振器减振性能的研究[J]. 振动与冲击,2017,(10):121-126.
Zhu Shanshan, Li Decai, Cui Hongchao, et al.Damping performance of magnetic fluid dampers in spacecrafts [J]. Journal of vibration and shock, 2017,(10):121-126.
[2] 王众.泵式磁流变减振器设计及试验研究[D].吉林大学,2016.
WANG Zhong. Design and experimental of the pumping magnetorheological damper[D].Jilin University, 2016.
[3] 曹和利.车用磁流变减振器结构设计与优化[D]. 湖南大学,2016.
CAO He-li.Design and optimization of magnetorheological damper for vehicle[D].Hunan University, 2016.
[4] 董小闵,于建强,杨茂举.考虑温度因素的磁流变减振器的优化设计与实验[J].振动与冲击,2016,(08):54-59.
DONG Xiaomin，YU Jianqiang，YANG Maoju. Optimization and experimental study of magneto-rheological fluid damper considering temperature effects[J]. Journal of vibration and shock,2016,(08):54-59.
[5] 寇发荣.汽车磁流变半主动悬架系统设计与试验[J].农业机械学报,2016,(04):280-287.
Kou Farong. Design and test of vehicle semi-active suspension with magnetorheological damper[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2016,(04):280-287.
[6] 张进秋,高永强,岳杰,等.磁流变减振器温衰特性对履带车辆悬挂系统性能的影响[J].噪声与振动控制, 2013,(03):119-123.
Zhang Jinqiu, Gao Yongqiang, Yue Jie, et al. Effect Analysis of Temperature-decay Performance of Magneto-rheological Fluid Damper on Tracked Vehicle Suspension System[J]. Journal of Noise and Vibration Control，2013,(03):119-123.
[7] Breese D G, Gordaninejad F. Heating of magneto rheological fluid dampers:a theoretical study [J]. Smart Structures and Materials:Smart Systems for Bridges,Structrues,and Highways,1999,2:348657.
[8] Alexander L, Swenja L. A thermomechanically coupled model for automotive shock absorbers: theory，experiments and vehicle simulations on test tracks [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2002, 37(4): 241-261.
[9] Ramos J C, Rivas A, Biera J, et al. Development of a thermal model for automotive twin-tube shock absorbers[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2005, 25(11–12): 1836-1853.
[10] Alonso M, Comas Á, Alonso M, et al. Thermal model of a twin tube cavitating shock absorber[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 2008, 222(11): 1955-1964.
[11] Sorniotti A, Velardocchia M. Shock Absorber Thermal Model: Basic Principles and Experimental Validation[J]. SAE TECHNICAL PAPER, 2008, 07(24).
[12] 余卓平,王欲峰,宁国宝,等.汽车液压减振器热-机耦合动力学影响因素分析[J].机械设计, 2007(11): 29-32.
Yu Zhuoping, Wang Yufeng, Ning Goubao, et al. Influencing factors analysis of thermal-mechanical coupled dynamics on hydraulic damper of automobile[J]. Journal of machine design, 2007(11): 29-32.
[13] 么鸣涛,顾亮,王国丽.车辆减振器设计参数对其温升的影响规律[J].机械设计与研究,2010(05): 109-113.
YAO Mingtao, GU Liang, WANG Guoli. Research on influence rules of design parameters of vehicular shock absorber on its temperature rising[J]. Journal of mechanical design and research, 2010(05): 109-113.
[14] 么鸣涛,顾亮,管继富.车辆双筒式减振器热物性影响规律分析[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版), 2011(02): 241-246.
YAO Mingtao，GU Liang，GUAN Jifu. Analysis of thermo-physical properties on influence rules of vehicular twin-tube shock absorber[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition), 2011(02): 241-246.
[15] 张敏敏.某乘用车液压减振器热特性建模与仿真研究[D].吉林大学,2014.
Zhang Minmin. Modeling and simulation on the hydraulic shock absorber’s thermal characteristics of a passenger car[D]. Jilin University, 2014.
[16] Shisha Z, Libo T, Jingang L, et al. A Novel Design of Magnetorheological Damper with Annular Radial Channel[J]. Shock and Vibration, 2016, 2016(37): 1-7.