几种典型复合材料板振动特性综合对比分析及设计规律研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献(18)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1590 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要为探究复合材料可设计参量对板格振动特性的影响规律，以玻璃钢板为设计基准，针对碳/玻混杂、橡胶格栅夹层、浮力材料格栅夹层等3种典型复合材料板方案，开展了固有频率和振动加速度振级特性的仿真分析和模型试验研究。研究结果表明，等厚度的碳/玻混杂板和玻璃钢板质量相当，碳/玻混杂板具有较好的振动抑制特性；格栅夹层板振动特性主要受芯材性能影响，浮力材料格栅夹层板刚度质量比最大，对测试频段内（0~2KHz）振动都有较好的抑制作用，而橡胶格栅板对更高频段（>2KHz）振动抑制效果较好，因此在芯材选择时应选用高阻尼、刚度与格栅想接近的材料；20mm等厚度的碳/玻混杂板振动响应略低于浮力材料格栅夹层板。以上结论可为复合材料板结构应用选型提供依据。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	刘建良1
	梅志远1
	唐宇航2
	张焱冰1
	张建设3

关键词 ：固有频率, 振动加速度, 玻璃钢, 碳/玻混杂, 橡胶格栅夹层, 浮力材料格栅夹层

Abstract：To investigate the influence law of composite panels’ design parameters on their vibration characteristics, simulation analysis and model tests were conducted for three panel schemes of C/GFRP, rubber-core grid sandwich and buoyant-core one to obtain their natural frequencies and vibration acceleration level characteristics.The results showed that a C/GFRP panel has the same mass as that of a GFRP panel with equal thickness, C/GFRP panel has a better vibration suppression feature; grid sandwich panels’ vibration characteristics are mainly affected by core material properties, buoyant-core grid sandwich panel has the largest ratio of stiffness to mass, and a better suppressing action on vibrations within the range of 0~2kHz,while rubber-core one has a better suppressing action on vibrations within the frequency range of higher than 2kHz, so core material with higher damping and stiffness close to that of grid should be chosen; the 20mm equal thickness C/GFRP panel’s vibration level is slightly lower than that of buoyant-core one; the conclusions above mentioned can provide a basis for application type selection of composite panels.

Key words： intrinsic frequency vibration acceleration GFRP C/GFRP rubber-core grid sandwich buoyancy-core grid sandwich

收稿日期: 2018-01-23 出版日期: 2019-07-28

引用本文:

刘建良1，梅志远1，唐宇航2，张焱冰1，张建设3. 几种典型复合材料板振动特性综合对比分析及设计规律研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2019, 38(15): 65-72.
LIU Jianliang 1,MEI Zhiyuan 2,TANG Yuhang 2,ZHANG Yanbing 1,ZHANG Jianshe 3. Comprehensive comparative analysis for vibration characteristics of several typical composite panels and their design law. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2019, 38(15): 65-72.

链接本文:

http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/Y2019/V38/I15/65

[1] Vinson J R，Kayran A. Free vibration analysis of laminated composite truncated circular shells[J]. Aiaa Journal，2015，28（7）：1259-1269.
[2] 梅志远, 杨坤, 邱家波. 复合材料面板对筒型基座整体抑振机制影响规律研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2012, 31(9):149-153.
MEI Zhiyuan, YANG Kun, QIU Jiabo. Damping mechanism of sandwich panel on cylindrical foundation[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2012, 31(9):149-153.
[3] 马力，杨金水. 新型轻质复合材料夹芯结构振动阻尼性能研究进展[J]. 应用数学和力学，2017，38（4）：369-398.
MA Li, YANG Jin-shui. Progresses in the Study on Vibration Damping Properties of Novel Lightweight Composite Sandwich Structures[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics. 2017, 38（4）：369-398.
[4] Shaidurova G I, Kostyaeva V I, Dyagileva M V. Fiberglass-composite exhaust pipes for gas compressors[J]. Russian Engineering Research, 2016, 36(11):930-933.
[5] Swan S, Yuksel T, Kim D, et al. Automation of the vacuum assisted resin transfer molding process for recreational composite yachts[J]. Polymer Composites, 2017, 38(11) : 2411-2424.
[6] Sonnenschein R, Gajdosova K, Holly I. FRP Composites and their Using in the Construction of Bridges[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 161:477-482.
[7] 黄志诚, 秦朝烨, 褚福磊. 附加粘弹阻尼层的薄壁构件振动问题研究综述[J]. 振动与冲击, 2014, 33(7):105-113.
HUANG Zhicheng, QIN Zhaoye, ZHU Fulei. A review about vibration of thin-walled structures with viscoelastic damping layer[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(7):105-113.
[8] 何世平，刘桂峰，金广文. 水下结构去耦覆盖层的动力吸振器效应研究[J]. 振动工程学报，2014，27（2）：208-214.
HE Shi-ping, LIU Gui-feng, JIN Guang-wen. Dynamic absorber characteristics of decoupling coating covering underwater structure[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering. 2014, 27（2）：208-214.
[9] Arunkumar M P, Pitchaimani J, Gangadharan K V, et al. Influence of nature of core on vibro acoustic behavior of sandwich aerospace structures[J]. Aerospace Science & Technology, 2016, 56:155-167.
[10] Farooq U, Ahmad M S, Rakha S A, et al. Interfacial Mechanical Performance of Composite Honeycomb Sandwich Panels for Aerospace Applications[J]. Arabian Journal for Science & Engineering, 2017, 42(5):1775-1782.
[11] Mukhopadhyay V. Blended-Wing-Body(BWB)fuselage structural design for weight reduction[R]. AIAA-2005-2349，2005.
[12] Vinson J R. Sandwich structures：past，present，and future[M].//Thomsen O T，Bozhevolnaya E，Lyckegaard A. Sandwich structures 7：advancing with sandwich structures and materials. Berlin：Springer，2005:3-12.
[13] 唐宇航，陈志坚，孙建连. 基于增抗增阻技术的船用母线线槽抑振设计[J]. 华中科技大学学报（自然科学版）. 2017，45（8）：120-126.
TANG Yuhang, CHEN Zhijian, SUN Jianlian. Vibration suppression design of marine busway based increasing resistance and increasing resistance technology[J]. Huazhong Univ. of Sci. &Tech. (Natural Science Edition). 2017，45（8）：120-126.
[14] 赵士贵，袭建人，陈国文. 碳纤维/玻璃纤维混杂复合材料性能研究[J]. 工程塑料应用，1999，27（12）：10-11.
ZHAO Shigui, XI Jianren, CHEN Guowen. The mechanical properties of CF/GF/EPOXY composites[J]. Engineering Plastics Application. 1999, 27（12）：10-11.
[15] Zhang J，Chaisombat K，He S, et al. Hybrid composite laminates reinforced with glass/carbon woven fabrics for lightweight load bearing structures [J]. Materials and Design，2012，36:75-80.
[16] Murugan R,Ramesh R,Padmanabhan K. Investigation on Static and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Based Woven Fabric Glass/Carbon Hybrid Composite Laminates[J]. Procedia Engineering，2014，97:459-468.
[17] Niu M C Y. Airfranme stress analysis and sizing[M]. 2nd Edition. Hong Kong：Hong Kong Conmilit Press LTD，1999.
[18] 任鹏, 张伟, 刘建华,等. 水下冲击波作用的铝合金蜂窝夹层板动力学响应研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(2):7-11.
REN Peng, ZHANG Wei, LIU Jianhua, et al. Dynamic analysis of aluminum alloy honeycomb core sandwich panels subjected to underwater shock loading[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(2):7-11.