有无填充墙板的穿斗式木结构房屋振动台试验及对比分析

摘要
图/表
参考文献(13)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (3786 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要通过对不设置填充墙板与设置填充墙板的穿斗式木结构房屋进行模拟地震振动台试验，研究了穿斗式木结构的抗震性能，并对比分析了两模型结构的动力特性，及其在不同峰值加速度地震作用下的加速度放大系数、位移及最大层间位移角等动力响应。研究结果表明：两模型X向加速度动力放大系数在0.63~1.2，Y向加速度动力放大系数在0.51~0.97，说明模型榫卯挤压摩擦的耗能减震效果明显。不设置填充墙板的模型结构自振频率低、位移响应较大，扭转效应明显；设置填充墙板的模型抗侧刚度明显增大，结构自振频率增大，同时在地震激励下相对位移和层间位移角减小。两模型主体结构在大震作用下均无明显损坏，且设置填充墙板的木结构房屋具有更大的承载力和抗倒塌能力。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	薛建阳
	许丹
	郭锐

关键词 ：穿斗式木结构房屋, 填充墙板, 振动台试验, 抗震性能, 动力特性

Abstract：Shaking table tests for two column-and-tie wooden houses of one without infills and the other with infills were conducted to study aseismic performance of column-and-tie wooden structure. Dynamic characteristics of the two model structures, and their acceleration amplification factor, displacement and the maximum inter-layer displacement angle under different peak acceleration earthquakes were contrastively analyzed. Results showed that acceleration amplification factors of the two models in X and Y directions are 0.63-1.2 and 0.51-0.97, respectively, so squeezing friction between mortise and tenon has obvious energy dissipation and vibration reduction effect; the model structure without infills has lower natural frequencies, larger displacement responses and obvious torsion effect; the lateral stiffness of the model with infills obviously increases, the model’s natural frequencies also increase, and its relative displacement and interlayer displacement angle decrease under seismic excitation; main body structures of the two models have no obvious damages under action of large earthquake; the wooden house with infills has a higher load-bearing capacity and a collapse-resistance one.

Key words： column-and-tie wooden building infills shaking table test aseismic performance dynamic characteristics

收稿日期: 2018-12-20 出版日期: 2020-06-28

引用本文:

薛建阳，许丹，郭锐. 有无填充墙板的穿斗式木结构房屋振动台试验及对比分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(13): 184-192.
XUE Jianyang, XU Dan, GUO Rui. Shaking table tests and contrastive analysis for column-and-tie wooden buildings with and without infills. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2020, 39(13): 184-192.

链接本文:

http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/Y2020/V39/I13/184

[1] 隋龑, 赵鸿铁, 薛建阳, 等. 古代殿堂式木结构建筑模型振动台试验研究 [J]. 建筑结构学报, 2010, 31(2): 35-40. (Sui Yan, Zhao Hongtie, Xue Jianyang, et al. A study on Chinese ancient timber structures by shaking table test [J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2010, 31(2): 35-40. ( in Chinese ) )

[2] 薛建阳, 张风亮, 赵鸿铁, 等. 单层殿堂式古建筑木结构动力分析模型 [J]. 建筑结构学报, 2012, 33(8): 135-142. (Xue Jianyang, Zhang Fengliang, Zhao Hongtie, et al. Dynamic analysis model of monolayer hall-style ancient timber structure [J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2012, 33(8): 135-142. ( in Chinese ) )

[3] 高延安, 杨庆山, 王娟, 等. 环境激励下古建筑飞云楼动力性能分析 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(22): 144-148+182. (Gao Yanan, Yang Qingshan, Wang Juan, et al. Dynamic performance of the ancient architecture of Feiyun pavilion under the condition of environmental excitation [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 34(22): 144-148+182.

[4] 李书进,铃木祥之. 足尺木结构房屋振动台试验及数值模拟研究 [J]. 土木工程学报, 2010 (12): 69-77. (Li Shujin, Suzuki Yoshiyuki. Full size shaking table test and numerical simulations of traditional wooden houses [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2010 (12): 69-77. ( in Chinese ) )

[5] 王海东, 尚守平, 何放龙, 等. 穿斗式木构架结构与轻型木结构抗震性能振动台试验研究 [J]. 建筑结构学报, 2012, 33(6): 138-143. (Wang Haidong, Shang Shouping, He Fanglong, et al. Shaking table tests of Chinese traditional wood building and light wood framed building [J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2012, 33(6): 138-143. ( in Chinese ) )

[6] 高永林, 陶忠, 叶燎原, 等. 带有粘弹性阻尼器穿斗木结构振动台试验研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(1): 240-247+260. (Gao Yonglin, Tao Zhong, Ye Liaoyuan, etc. Shaking table tests for a chuan-dou timber building with viscoelastic dampers [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(1): 240-247+260.

[7] Hsu M F, Yeo S Y, Shang P Y, et al. Full-scale experiment on Taiwanese traditional timber frame [C]//Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Non-conventional Materials and Technologies. 2009.

[8] 孙柏涛, 张昊宇, 闫培雷. 芦山 7.0 级地震穿斗木构架房屋震害特点及原因简析 [J]. 土木工程学报, 2014, 47(3): 1-11. (Sun Baitao, Zhang Haoyu, Yan Peilei. Earthquake damage and feature analysis of Chinese traditional timber frame structures subjected to the Lushan 7.0 earthquake [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2014, 47(3): 1-11. ( in Chinese ) )

[9] 滕睿, 曲哲, 张永群. 川南地区穿斗式木构架民居的动力特性 [J]. 世界地震工程, 2014, 30(3): 229-234. (Teng Rui, Qu Zhe, Zhang Yongqun. Dynamic characteristics of Chuandou-type timber houses in southern Sichuan [J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2014, 30(3): 229-234. ( in Chinese ) )

[10] Crayssac E, Song X B, Wu Y J, Li K. Lateral performance of mortise-tenon jointed traditional timber frames with wood panel infill [J]. Engineering Structures, 2018(161): 223-230.

[11] 周颖, 吕西林. 建筑结构振动台模型试验方法与技术 [M]. 北京：科学出版社，2012. (Zhou Ying, Lv Xilin. Method and technology for shaking table model test of building structures [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2012. ( in Chinese ) )

[12] GB50165—92 古建筑木结构维护与加固技术规范 [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社，1992. (GB50165—92 Technical code for maintenance and strengthening of ancient timber buildings [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 1992. ( in Chinese ) )

[13] 王秀丽, 金恩平. 多遇地震下空间结构的扭转效应分析 [J]. 土木建筑与环境工程, 2011, 33(增1): 65-69. (Wang Xiuli, Jin Enping. Analysis on Torsional Effect of the Spatial Structure in Frequent Earthquakes [J]. Journal of Civil, Architectural& Environmental Engineering, 2011, 33(S1): 65-69. ( in Chinese )