旋转叶片高频涡脱落噪声源的双阵列声成像试验研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献(21)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1398 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要旋转叶片的涡脱落噪声是一类典型的指向性声源，但由于叶片的旋转尚无法准确测量旋转叶片涡流噪声的指向性。利用两个平面阵列在叶片旋转面的平行和垂直两个方向对声源进行了声成像试验研究。试验中选择不同的叶片旋转方位角位置对涡脱落气动噪声进行波束形成声成像，通过比较声源在叶片不同方位角以及不同阵列方向的声成像结果验证了旋转叶片涡脱落噪声的指向性，并且分析了不同的叶片旋转方位角对涡脱落噪声的影响。试验结果验证了双阵列声成像测量方案的可行性和有效性，成像结果的对比表明使用的NACA0012桨叶在2.5 kHz下的旋转气动噪声源为指向性声源。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	高建正
	吴海军
	蒋伟康

关键词 ：气动噪声, 声源定位, 麦克风阵列, 波束形成, 旋转叶片, 旋转声源, 指向性声源, 双阵列声成像

Abstract：The vortex shedding noise of rotating blade is a kind of typical directional sound source. However, the directivity of vortex shedding noise can’t be measured accurately due to blade rotating. Here, two planar arrays were used to study the acoustic imaging of sound source in two directions of parallel and vertical to the rotating surface of blade. In tests, different blade rotation azimuth positions were selected to perform beamforming acoustic imaging of vortex shedding aerodynamic noise. The directivity of vortex shedding noise was verified by comparing acoustic imaging results under different blade azimuth angles and array directions, and effects of different blade rotation azimuth angles on vortex shedding noise were analyzed. The test results verified the feasibility and effectiveness of the dual-array acoustic imaging measurement scheme. The comparison of imaging results showed that the rotating aerodynamic noise source of NACA0012 blade at 2.5 kHz is directional.

Key words： aerodynamic noise sound source localization microphone array beamforming rotor blades rotating source directional sound source double-array acoustic imaging

收稿日期: 2020-01-09 出版日期: 2021-04-15

引用本文:

高建正，吴海军，蒋伟康. 旋转叶片高频涡脱落噪声源的双阵列声成像试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(7): 148-153.
GAO Jianzheng, WU Haijun, JIANG Weikang. Dual-array acoustic imaging tests of high frequency vortex shedding noise source for rotating blades. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2021, 40(7): 148-153.

链接本文:

http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V40/I7/148

［1］WAGNER S, BAREISS R, GUIDATI G. Wind turbine noise［M］. Berlin: Springer, 1996.
［2］DOOLAN C J, MOREAU D J, BROOKS L A. Wind turbine noise mechanisms and some concepts foe its control［J］. Acoustics Australia, 2011, 40(1): 7-13.
［3］JOHNSON W. Helicopter theory［M］. New York: Dover Publications, 1994.
［4］YUDIN E Y. On the vortex sound from rotating rods: NACA-TM-1136［R］. Virgina: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley Aeronautical Lab, 1947.
［5］ALLEN C S, BLAKE W K, DOUGHERTY R P, et al. Aeroacoustic measurements［M］. Berlin: Springer, 2002.
［6］张金圈, 毕传兴, 陈心昭. Beamforming方法的阵列研究及其在噪声源识别中的应用［J］. 噪声与振动控制, 2009, 29(3): 54-58.
ZHANG Jinquan, BI Chuanxing, CHEN Xinzhao. Study on array pattern and its application in noise source identification using beam forming method［J］. Noise and Vibration Control, 2009, 29(3): 54-58.
［7］褚志刚, 杨洋, 倪计民, 等. 波束形成声源识别技术研究进展［J］. 声学技术, 2013(5): 430-435.
CHU Zhigang, YANG Yang, NI Jimin, et al. Review of beamforming based sound source identification techniques［J］. Technical Acoustics, 2013(5): 430-435.
［8］褚志刚, 杨洋, 王卫东, 等. 基于波束形成方法的货车车外加速噪声声源识别［J］. 振动与冲击, 2012, 31(7): 66-70.
CHU Zhigang, YANG Yang, WANG Weidong, et al. Identification of truck noise sources under passby condition based on wave beamforming method［J］. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2012, 31(7): 66-70.
［9］RAMACHANDRAN R, RAMAN G. Evaluation of various beamforming algorithms for wind turbine noise measurement［C］∥49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Orlando: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2011.
［10]YU L, WU H J, ANTONI J, et al. Extraction and imaging of aerodynamically generated sound field of rotor blades in the wind tunnel test［J］. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2019, 116: 1017-1028. 
［11］宋永兴, 伍柯霖, 初宁, 等. 基于调制强度的地铁风机常见故障诊断方法的研究［J］. 风机技术, 2019, 61(1): 77-81.
SONG Yongxing, WU Kelin, CHU Ning, et al. Research on fault diagnosis method of metro fan based on modulation intensity［J］. Chinese Journal of Turbomachinery, 2019, 61(1):77-81.
［12］MO P X, JIANG W K. A hybrid deconvolution approach to separate static and moving single-tone acoustic sources by phased microphone array measurements［J］. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2017, 84: 399-413. 
［13］MO P X, JIANG W K. A hybrid deconvolution approach to separate acoustic sources in multiple motion modes［J］. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2017, 142(1): 276-285.
［14］OERLEMANS S, SIJTSMA P, MNDEZ LPEZ B. Location and quantification of noise sources on a wind turbine［J］. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2007, 299(4/5): 869-883.
［15］OERLEMANS S, SCHEPERS J G, GUIDATI G, et al. Experimental demonstration of wind turbine noise reduction through optimized airfoil shape and trailing-edge serrations: NLR-TP-2001-324［R］. Emmeloord: National Aerospace Laboratory, 2001. 
［16］OERLEMANS S, SCHEPERS J G. Prediction of wind turbine noise and validation against experiment［J］. International Journal of Aeroacoustics, 2009, 8: 555-584.
［17］SETO W W. Schaum’s outline of theory and problems of acoustics［M］. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
［18］LIU Y, QUAYLE A R, DOWLING A P, et al. Beamforming correction for dipole measurement using two-dimensional microphone arrays［J］. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2008, 124: 182-191.
［19］KOPIEV V, ZAITSEV M, KARAVOSOV R. Experimental investigation of azimuthal structure of dipole noise for rigid cylinder inserted in turbulent jet［C］∥10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. Manchester: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2004. 
［20］PORTEOUS R, PRIME Z, DOOLAN C J, et al. Three-dimensional beamforming of dipolar aeroacoustic sources［J］. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2015, 355: 117-134. 
［21］AMIET R K. Noise due to turbulent flow past a trailing edge［J］. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1976, 47: 387-393.