不同梁线刚度情形下组合梁柱子结构抗倒塌性能研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献(19)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (2601 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

钢框架结构某根柱失效后，与失效柱相连的双跨梁对剩余结构的内力重分布和实现再平衡起到关键作用，而此时相邻双跨梁的线刚度对结构抗倒塌性能具有显著影响。以栓焊连接节点组合梁柱子结构拟静力试验结果作为校验，验证有限元建模方法的正确性。并建立了不同梁线刚度情形下的组合梁柱子结构足尺模型，重点分析了不同梁线刚度对组合梁柱子结构的内力发展和抗倒塌性能的影响。对目前基于变形的结构失效判定准则进行修正，基于该修正准则定量分析了双跨梁的梁机制抗力和悬链线机制抗力贡献水平，可为结构抗倒塌设计提供依据，对实际工程应用提供参考。分析结果表明：双跨梁的线刚度决定了梁机制抗力水平；而双跨梁的跨度决定了悬链线机制抗力水平，梁高对其影响较小，过大的梁线刚度不利于结构的位移发展。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	谭政1
	钟炜辉1
	2
	段仕超1
	孟宝1
	郑玉辉1
	宋晓燕1

关键词 ：组合梁柱子结构, 连续倒塌, 梁线刚度, 失效准则, 定量评估

Abstract：

When a column of a steel frame structure fails, the two-bay beams connected with the failed column play a key role in the internal force redistribution and re-equilibrium of the remaining structure, at that time, the beam line stiffness has a significant impact on the collapse resistance of the structure.The quasi-static test results of a composite beam-column substructure with rigid connections were used to verify the finite element modeling method.The full-scale model of the composite beam-column substructure with different beam line stiffness was established and the influence of beam line stiffness on the internal force development and collapse resistance of the composite beam-column substructure were emphatically analyzed.The current structural failure criterion based on deformation was modified, and on this basis, the contribution of the flexural mechanism and catenary mechanism resistances was quantitatively analysed, providing a basis for structural collapse resistance design and a reference for practical engineering application.The analysis results show that the linear stiffness of the two-bay beams determines the resistance level of the flexural mechanism, while the span of the two-bay beams determines the resistance level of the catenary mechanism.The beam height has little influence on it, and the excessive beam line stiffness is not conducive to the displacement development of the structure.

Key words： composite beam-column substructure progressive collapse beam line stiffness failure criterion quantitative assessment

收稿日期: 2019-11-06 出版日期: 2021-05-28

引用本文:

谭政1，钟炜辉1,2，段仕超1，孟宝1，郑玉辉1，宋晓燕1. 不同梁线刚度情形下组合梁柱子结构抗倒塌性能研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(10): 57-66.
TAN Zheng1，ZHONG Weihui1,2，DUAN Shichao1，MENG Bao1，ZHENG Yuhui1，SONG Xiaoyan1. Research on anti-collapse performance of composite beam-column substructures with different beam line stiffness. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2021, 40(10): 57-66.

链接本文:

http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V40/I10/57

［1］DOD.Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse: UFC 4-023-03［S］.Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense, 2009.

［2］GSA.Alternate path analysis & design guidelines for progressive collapse resistance: GSA 2013［S］.Washington, D.C.: General Services Administration, 2013.

［3］建筑结构抗倒塌设计规范: CECS 392—2014［S］.北京: 中国计划出版社, 2014.

［4］MENG B, ZHONG W H, HAO J P.Anti-progressive collapse behavior of beam-to-column assemblies with bolted-angle connections under different span ratios［J］.Advances in Structural Engineering, 2018, 21(6): 891-905.

［5］WANG W, WANG J J, SUN X, et al.Slab effect of composite subassemblies under a column removal scenario［J］.Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017,129(2): 141-155.

［6］史艳莉, 石晓飞, 王文达, 等.圆钢管混凝土柱-H钢梁内隔板式节点抗连续倒塌机理研究［J］.振动与冲击, 2016,35(19): 148-155.
SHI Yanli, SHI Xiaofei, WANG Wenda, et al.Progressive collapse mechanism for H-beam-concrete-filled steel tubular column connections with inner-diaphragm joints［J］.Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016,35(19): 148-155.

［7］YANG B, TAN K H, XIONG G, et al.Experimental study about composite frames under an internal column-removal scenario［J］.Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2016,121: 341-351.

［8］WENG J, LEE C K, TAN K H, et al.Damage assessment for reinforced concrete frames subject to progressive collapse［J］.Engineering Structures, 2017,149: 147-160.

［9］ZHONG W H, MENG B, HAO J P.Performance of different stiffness connections against progressive collapse［J］.Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017,135: 162-175.

［10］LOH H Y, UY B, BRADFORD M A.The effects of partial shear connection in composite flush end plate joints Part II: analytical study and design appraisal［J］.Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2006,62(4): 391-412.

［11］钢结构设计标准: GB 50017—2017［S］.北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2017.

［12］IZZUDDIN B A, VLASSIS A G, NETHERCOT D A.Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss-part I:simplified assessment pramework［J］.Engineering Structures, 2008, 30(5): 1308-1318.

［13］ZHONG W H, TAN Z, SONG X Y, et al.Anti-collapse analysis of unequal span steel beam-column substructure considering the composite effect of floor slabs［J］.Advance Steel Construction, 2019,15(4): 377-385.

［14］Recommended seismic evaluation and upgrade criteria for existing welded steel moment-frame buildings: FEMA-351［S］.California: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.

［15］混凝土结构设计规范: GB 50010—2010［S］.北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.

［16］YU H L, JEONG D Y.Application of a stress triaxiality dependent fracture criterion in the finite element analysis of unnotched Charpy specimens［J］.Theoretical & Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2010,54(1): 54-62.

［17］LEE Y W, WIERZBICKI T.Quick fracture calibration for industrial use: 115［R］.Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2004.

［18］赵鸿铁, 张素梅.组合结构设计原理［M］.北京：高等教育出版社, 2005.

［19］钟炜辉, 谭政, 宋晓燕, 等.基于楼板组合效应的梁柱子结构抗倒塌性能研究［J］.振动与冲击, 2021,40(10): 261-270.
ZHONG Weihui, TAN Zheng, SONG Xiaoyan, et al.Analysis of anti-collapse performance for beam-column substructure based on composite effect of floor slabs［J］.Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021,40(10): 261-270.