There are some disadvantages for the existing frictional energy dissipation shock absorber such as the constant damping force in the fixed pre-tightening force, low energy consumption working in small displacement and bigger frictional damping force in bigger pre-tightening force. To overcome these deficiencies, a new type of energy dissipation shock absorber, which has function of amplifying displacement, was put forward in my study. The principle of displacement amplification and the corresponding structural design scheme of the new shock absorber are discussed in this paper. After the mechanical properties of this new type of shock absorber are calculated, the nonlinear hysteretic characteristic curve is obtained. On this basis, a five-layers planar steel frame structure considered the soil-structure interaction is selected to establish three kinds of structural systems,which are original structure, damping structure with the existing shock absorbers and damping structure with new shock absorbers. The time history of these three systems under frequent earthquakes has been analyzed by ADAMS software. The relative displacement between the layers and the absolute layer displacement response peaks of the three kinds of structural systems are obtained. The calculations show as following: 1) This new type of shock absorber, which has been proposed in this paper, can magnify displacement by more than six times, have a bigger frictional damping force in smaller pre-tightening force and saddle hysteretic characteristic curve. Meanwhile, it still has better damping effect under the condition of small displacement. 2) Both the traditional damping structure and the new damping structure have obvious reduction effect on relative displacement between the layers and the absolute layer displacement. The new damping structure has a better reduction effect on displacement between the layers and absolute displacement of the layers than traditional damping structure, and the difference is more obvious under the condition of small displacement. Compared with the original structure, the maximum decreases of relative displacement between the layers and the absolute layer displacement amplitude are respectively decreased by 55.81% and 51.60%. Compared with the traditional damping structure, the maximum decreases of relative displacement between the layers and the absolute layer displacement amplitude are respectively decreased by 42.71% and 43.38%. The new shock absorber, which was put forward in my study, has good mechanical properties and damping effect, so it has a better prospect of application and popularization.
沈国栋,何芝仙,时培成. 地震荷载作用下新型耗能减震器减震性能分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(21): 251-257.
SHEN Guodong, HE Zhixian, SHI Peicheng. Performance analysis of new energy-dissipation shock absorber under earthquake load. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2021, 40(21): 251-257.
[1] 程耿东,李刚.基于性能的结构抗震设计中一些问题探讨[J].建筑结构学报,2000,21(01):5-11.
CHENG Geng-dong, Li Gang. Discussion on some problems in performance-based seismic design of structures [J]. Journal of architectural structure, 2000,21 (01) : 5-11.
[2] Pall A S, Marsh C. Friction-damped Concrete Shear walls [C]//ACI Journal Proceedings. ACI,1981,78(3).
[3] Pall A S,Marsh C. Response of friction damped braced frames [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,1982,108(9):1313-1323.
[4] Aiken I D,Kelly J M. Earthquake simulator testing and analytical studies of two energy-absorbing systems for multistory structures[D]. Berkeley:university of California,1990.
[5] 吴斌,欧进萍,张纪刚.Pall型摩擦阻尼器的实验研究与数值分析[J].建筑结构学报,2003,(4):07-13.
WU bin, OU Jin-ping, ZHANG Ji-gang. Experimental study and numerical analysis of Pall friction damper [J]. Journal of architectural structure, 2003,(4): 07-13.
[6] 王茜茜,张洵安,卢立恒.摩擦阻尼器在工程结构中的研究与应用[J]. 西北工业大学学报,2010,28(3):442-447.
WANG Qian-qian, ZHANG Xun-an, LU Li-heng. Research and application of friction damper in engineering structure [J]. Journal of northwestern polytechnical university, 2010,28 (3) : 442-447.
[7] Mirtaheri M, Zandi A P. Numerical and Experimental Study of Hysteretic Behavior of Cylindrical Friction Dampers[J].Engineering Structures,2011,33:3647-3656.
[8] 王伟,李庆祥,刘广义.永磁摩擦耗能装置结构体系被动控制实验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2004,25(2):17-22.
WANG Wei, LI Qing-xiang, LIU Guang-yi. Experimental study on passive control of structure system of permanent magnet friction energy dissipation device[J]. Journal of building structures, 2004,25 (2): 17-22.
[9] 王伟,李庆祥. 电磁摩擦耗能装置结构体系被动控制实验研究[J].土木工程学报,2004,37(12):17-22.
WANG Wei, LI Qing-xiang. Experimental study on passive control of structure system of electromagnetic friction energy dissipation device[J]. Journal of civil engineering, 2004,37 (12) : 17-22.
[10] 张维岳,杨蔚彪,底周反复荷载下二阶摩擦减振控制支撑框架的实验研究[J].建筑科学,2003,33(8):3-7.
ZHANG Wei-yue, YANG Wei-biao. Experimental study on second-order frictional vibration control support frame under cyclic load[J]. Building science, 2003,33 (8) : 3-7.
[11] Samani H R,Mirtaheri M,Zandi A P. Experimental and Numerical Study of a New Adjustable Frictional damper[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2015,112:354-362.
[12] Ozbulut O E,Hurlebaus S. Re-centering Variable Friction Device for Vibration Control of Structures Subjected to Near-field Earthquakes[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2011,25:2849-2862.
[13] 王贡献,王洋洋,袁建明,等. 新型弧面摩擦阻尼器的试验研究[J] .北京:机械工程学报,2017,(389):89-100.
WANG Gong-xian, WANG Yang-yang, YUAN Jian-ming, et al. Experimental study on a new type of arc-surface friction damper[J]. Beijing: journal of mechanical engineering, 2017, (389) : 89-100.
[14] 潘鹏,叶列平,钱稼茹,等.建筑结构消能减震设计与案例[M],北京:北京大学出版社,2014.
PAN Peng,Ye-lie ping, Qian-Jia ru ,et al.. Energy Dissipation design and Case study of Building Structures [M], Beijing: Peking University Press, 2014.
[15] STEJSKA J V, VALASEK M. Kinematics and dynamics of machinery [M]. New York:Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1996.
[16] WOLF J P. Spring-dashpot-mass models for foundation vibrations[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering &Structural Dynamics. 1997, 26(9): 931-949.
[17] MULLIKEN J S, KARABALIS D L. Discrete model for dynamic through-the-soil coupling of 3-D foundations and structures [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1998, 27(7): 687-710.