1. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Engineering Structure Safety, Shanghai 200032, China；
2. Shanghai Research Institute of Building Science(Group), Co., Ltd, Shanghai 200032, China
Abstract：A type of practicable frame-rocking wall structure was proposed with the concept of replaceable member. According to the experimental study, four kinds of finite element (FE) models with different joint types were performed for simulating frame-rocking wall structure. The FE results show that the rigid joint should be adopted between ductility connectors and rocking wall or frame, while the rubber and shear keys between rocking wall and base can be simplified into hinge joint. Parametric analysis show that, as the increasing of the diameter of ductility connector and the thickness of rocking wall, inter-storey drifts of frame-rocking wall structure become more uniformly distributed, which leads to the increase of bearing capacity of the structure but the increasing rate becomes slower. The reasonable thickness of rocking wall should be determined according to the seismic demand, then the diameter and configuration of ductility connector can be optimized as presented in the paper.
张富文1,2，李向民1,2,，陈玲珠1,2，许清风1,2. 一种框架摇摆墙结构的实现形式及其有限元分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(17): 213-217.
ZHANG Fuwen 1,2, LI Xiangmin 1,2,Chen Lingzhu 1,2, XU Qingfeng 1,2. Design and Finite Element Analysis of A New Frame-rocking Wall Structure. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2016, 35(17): 213-217.
[1] Housner G. W.. The behavior of inverted pendulum structure during earthquakes[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1963, 53(2): 402-417.
[2] Hukelbridge A. A., Clough R. W.. Preliminary experimental study of seismic uplift of a steel frame[R]. Report No. UCB/EERC-77/22. Berkely: University of California, Berkely, 1977.
[3] Meek J. W.. Dynamic response of tipping core buildings[J]. Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1978, 6(5): 437-454.
[4] Kurama C, Sause R, Pessiki S, et al. Lateral load behavior and seismic design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1999, 96(4): 622-633. [5] Panian L., Steyer M., Tipping S.. An innovative approach to earthquake safety and concrete construction in buildings[J]. Journal of the Post-Tensioning Institute, 2007, 5(1): 7-16.
[6] Stevenson M., Panian L., Korolyk M, et al.. Post-tensioned concrete walls and frames for seismic-resistance - a case study of the David Brower Center[C]. Proceedings of the SEAOC Annual Convention, Hawaii, US, 2008.
[7] Wada A, Qu Z, Ito H, et al. Seismic retrofit using rocking walls and steel dampers[C]. Proc. ATC/SEI Conference on Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures, San Francisco, U.S.A, 2009.
[8] 曹海韵，潘鹏，叶列平. 基于推覆分析混凝土框架摇摆墙结构抗震性能研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2011, 30(11): 240-244.
Cao Haiyun, Pan Peng, Ye Lieping. Pushover analysis of RC frame rocking wall structure[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2011, 30(11):240-244. (in Chinese)
[9] 裴星洙，王佩. 混凝土框架-摇摆墙体系抗震性能研究[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造, 2013, 35(2): 19-28.
Pei Xingzhu, Wang Pei. Study on seismic property of RC frame rocking wall[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 2013, 35(2): 19-28. (in Chinese)
[10] 徐佳琦，吕西林. 基于能量的框架-摇摆墙结构与框架-剪力墙结构地震反应分析对比[J]. 建筑结构, 2013, 43(S): 418-422.
Xu Jiaqi, Lu Xilin. Energy based seismic response of frame-rocking-wall structure and frame-shear-wall structure[J]. Building Structure, 2013, 43(S): 418-422. (in Chinese)
[11] GB50010-2010 混凝土结构设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
GB50010-2010 Code for design of concrete structure[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2010. (in Chinese)
[12] Mander J. B., Priestley M. J. N., Park R.. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete[J], Journal of Structural Engineering, 1986, 114(8):1804-1826.
[13] 张富文，李向民，许清风等. 框架-摇摆墙结构抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报，2015，36(8)：73-81.
Zhang Fuwen, Li Xiangmin, Xu Qingfeng, et al. Experimental study on seismic behavior of frame-rocking wall structure[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2015, 36(8): 73-81. (in Chinese)
