Optimization research for base-isolated structures with fluid viscous dampers
CHEN Ruisheng1, WU Jinbiao2, LIU Yanhui2, Marco Donà2，3, JIN Jianmin2
1.Zhejiang University of Technology Engineering Design Group Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310014, China;
2.Earthquake Engineering Research & Test Center, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510405, China;
3.Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering (ICEA), University of Padova, Padova 35131, Italy
Abstract：For the base-isolated structure with fluid viscous damper in isolation layer, a parametric multi-objective optimization method of fluid viscous damper using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-Ⅱ) was proposed. Bouc-Wen model was applied to simulate the isolation layer’s force-deformation behavior. The motion equation was established for time-history analysis. The total displacement of the isolation layer and superstructure were selected as the optimization objective. The Pareto optimal front can be gained through algorithm. A six-storey base-isolated structure was selected as an example of numerical analysis. The vibration responses of the isolation layer were selected for FFT spectrum analysis and response spectrum analysis. By adjusting the constraint of optimization target and the optimization range of the parameters, NSGA -Ⅱ was also used to obtain a more concentrated parameter distribution, and the effectiveness of the damper was verified by other earthquake. The results show that the optimal dampers can effectively reduce the displacement of isolation layer; For some earthquake, the optimal dampers may be detrimental to the seismic response of the superstructure, however, the seismic response of the superstructure can be kept in acceptable range by reducing the effectiveness of fluid viscous damper; The damper effectiveness depends on the type of earthquake. When the main excitation frequency of the isolation layer tends to lower in the range of first mode frequency, the damper has better effectiveness in controlling the displacement of isolation layer; the damper effectiveness is correlated with the acceptable supplemental damping of isolation layer; The excessive supplemental damping is not favorable to the dynamic response of the superstructure; According to the threshold of the displacement of the isolation layer and the reduced optimal range of the damper parameters, the designer obtain the damper parameters that can be applied to actual projects.
陈瑞生1，吴进标2，刘彦辉2，Marco Donà2,3，金建敏2. 黏滞阻尼器-基础隔震混合体系优化研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(11): 93-100.
CHEN Ruisheng1, WU Jinbiao2, LIU Yanhui2, Marco Donà2，3, JIN Jianmin2. Optimization research for base-isolated structures with fluid viscous dampers. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2020, 39(11): 93-100.
[1] Heaton T H, Hall J F, Wald D J, et al. Response of high-rise and base-isolated buildings to a hypothetical Mw 7.0 blind thrust earthquake[J]. Science, 1995, 267(5195): 206-211.
[2] Makris N. Rigidity–plasticity–viscosity: can electro- rheological dampers protect base-isolated structures from near-source ground motions[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1997, 26(5): 571-91.
[3] Kelly JM. Role of damping in seismic isolation[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1999, 28(1): 3-20.
[4] Hall J. Discussion. The role of damping in seismic isolation[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1999, 28 (12): 1717-1720.
[5] Providakis CP. Effect of LRB isolators and supplemented viscous dampers on seismic isolated buildings under near fault excitations[J]. Engineering Structures, 2008, 32(4): 1187-1198.
[6] Providakis CP. Effect of supplemental damping on LRB and FPS seismic isolators under near-fault ground motions[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2009, 29(1): 80-90.
[7] Ziyaeifar M, Noguchi H. Partial mass isolation in tall buildings[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1998, 27(1): 49-65.
[8] Jangid RS, Kelly JM. Base isolation for near-fault motions[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2001, 30(5): 691-707.
[9] Politopoulos I. A review of adverse effects of damping in seismic isolation [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2008, 37(3): 447-465.
[10] Charmpis DC, Komodromos P, Phocas MC. Optimized earthquake response of multi-storey buildings with seismic isolation at various elevations[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2012, 41(15): 2289-2310.
[11] Zhou Q, Singh MP, Huang XY. Model reduction and optimal parameters of mid-story isolation systems[J]. Engineering Structures, 2016, 124(1): 36-48.
[12]王明旭, 陈国平. 基于结构能量准则的阻尼器位置及参数优化[J]. 振动、测试与诊断,2011,31（6）：754-758.
Wang Mingxu, Chen Guoping. Optimization on Placement and Parameters of Damping Design Using Energy Criterion [J]. Journal o Vibration, Measurement & Diagnosis, 2011,31(6):754-758. (in Chinese)
[13] 彭勇波，曾小树，陈建兵. 考虑参数随机性的高层建筑风振舒适度的非线性黏滞阻尼器优化布设[J]. 建筑结构学报,2018,39(1):11-20.
PENG Yongbo，ZENG Xiaoshu，CHEN Jianbing. Nonlinear viscous damper deployment for wind-induced comfortability control of high-rise buildings with random parameters[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2018, 39 (1): 11-20.(in Chinese)
[14] Cu VH, Han B, Nguyen TN. Optimal Parameters of Viscous Damper for Hanged Cables in Arch Bridges[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2016, 20(2): 847-854.
[15] Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182-197.
[16] Ismail M, Ikhouane F, Rodellar J. The hysteresis Bouc-Wen model: A survey[J]. Archives of Computational Methods In Engineering, 2009, 16(2): 161-188.
