蜂窝铝夹芯板抗侵彻性能研究
袁浩1,2,任凯1,2,任晓鹏3,杨丽3,张银3,付建平1,2,陈智刚1,2
1.中北大学机电工程学院,太原030051;
2.中北大学地下目标毁伤技术国防重点学科实验室,太原030051;
3.晋西工业集团有限责任公司,太原030000
Anti-penetration performance of honeycomb aluminum sandwich panel
YUAN Hao1,2, REN Kai1,2, REN Xiaopeng3, YANG Li3, ZHANG Yin3, FU Jianping1,2, CHEN Zhigang1,2
1.College of Mechatronic Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China;
2.National Defense Key Discipline Lab of Underground Target Damage Technology, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China;
3.Jinxi Industry Group Co., Ltd., Taiyuan 030000, China
摘要 为探究蜂窝铝夹芯板的抗侵彻性能,对Ø6mm钨球侵彻蜂窝铝夹芯板进行了试验研究,得到弹道极限速度为169m/s;为了进一步比较侵彻蜂窝铝夹芯板抗侵彻规律,使用LS-DYNA进行数值模拟,将不同形状破片侵彻蜂窝铝夹芯板与间隔铝靶进行分析比较,并通过数值模拟与改进后的De Marre公式对2A12等效靶厚度计算结果进行了对比分析,结果为:抗球形破片侵彻最差,夹芯层可增加靶板约18% 的强度;数值模拟的等效2A12铝靶厚度为1.30mm,理论计算为1.33mm,相对误差在5%以内,可以满足工程计算要求。研究结果可为反卫星和反航天目标战斗部的设计提供一定的参考。
关键词:蜂窝铝夹芯板;极限穿透速度;数值模拟;De Marre公式;等效靶;
关键词 :
蜂窝铝夹芯板 ,
极限穿透速度 ,
数值模拟 ,
De Marre公式 ,
等效靶
Abstract :In order to explore the anti-penetration performance of the honeycomb aluminum sandwich panel, an experimental study was carried out on the penetration of the Ø6mm tungsten ball into the honeycomb aluminum sandwich panel, and the ballistic limit speed was 169m/s;In order to further compare the anti penetration law of penetrating honeycomb aluminum sandwich panel, LS-DYNA is used for numerical simulation to analyze and compare the penetration of fragments with different shapes into honeycomb aluminum sandwich plate and spacer aluminum target,and the equivalent target thickness of 2A12 is analyzed by numerical simulation and improved de Marre formula,The results show that the penetration resistance of spherical fragments is the worst, and the sandwich layer can increase the strength of the target by about 18%;The equivalent 2A12 aluminum target thickness of numerical simulation is 1.3mm, and the theoretical calculation is 1.33mm. The relative error is less than 5%, which can meet the requirements of engineering calculation.The research results can provide some reference for the design of anti satellite and anti space target warhead.
Keywords:Honeycomb aluminum sandwich panel;Limit penetration velocity;Numerical Simulation;De Marre formula;equivalent targrt;
Key words :
Honeycomb aluminum sandwich panel
Limit penetration velocity
Numerical Simulation
De Marre formula
equivalent targrt
收稿日期: 2021-04-21
出版日期: 2022-10-15
引用本文:
袁浩1,2,任凯1,2,任晓鹏3,杨丽3,张银3,付建平1,2,陈智刚1,2. 蜂窝铝夹芯板抗侵彻性能研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(19): 98-103.
YUAN Hao1,2, REN Kai1,2, REN Xiaopeng3, YANG Li3, ZHANG Yin3, FU Jianping1,2, CHEN Zhigang1,2. Anti-penetration performance of honeycomb aluminum sandwich panel. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2022, 41(19): 98-103.
链接本文:
http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://jvs.sjtu.edu.cn/CN/Y2022/V41/I19/98
[1] Gunes R, Arslan K. Development of numerical realistic model for predicting low-velocity impact response of aluminium honeycomb sandwich structures [J]. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Matericals, 2015, 97(7): 529-538.
[2]肖 锋,华宏星,谌 勇,黄修长,朱大巍. 潜艇湿表面抗冲覆盖层压缩特性及抗冲击性能研究[J]. , 2013, 32(18): 126-132.
XIAO Feng, HUA Hong-Xing, CHEN Yong,HUANG Xiu-chang, ZHU Da-wei. Performance analysis on compression and shock resistance of anti-shock layer coated onto submarine wetted surface. 2013, 32(18): 126-132.
[3]任 鹏,张 伟,刘建华,黄 威. 水下冲击波作用的铝合金蜂窝夹层板动力学响应研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(2): 7-11.
REN Peng, ZHANG Wei2, LIU Jian-hua1, HUANG Wei. Dynamics analysis of aluminium alloy honeycomb core sandwich panels subjected to underwater shock loading. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2016, 35(2): 7-11.
[4]肖 锋;华宏星;谌 勇;朱大巍;马 超. 设计参数对手性蜂窝橡胶覆盖层水下爆炸抗冲击性能的影响[J]. , 2014, 33(1): 56-62.
XIAO Feng, HUA Hong-Xin, CHEN Yong, ZHU Da-wei, MA Chao. The influence of design parameters on underwater explosion shock resistance of chiral honeycomb rubber cladding. , 2014, 33(1): 56-62.
[5]曹 杰,葛建立,王 浩等蜂窝铝冲击波形数值计算分析[J]. 弹道学报. 2017,29(4):58-63.
CAO Jie, GE Jian-Hi, WANG Hao, et al. Numerical Simulation on Shock Waveform of Aluminum Honeycombs[J]. Joumal of Ballistics, 2017, 29(4): 58-63.
[6]王晓强,胡方靓,徐双喜. 蜂窝夹芯板的抗高速冲击性能研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程板).
Wang Xiao-qiang, Hu Fang-liang, Xu Shuang-xi.Study on high-velocity impact behaviour of honeycomb sandwich panels[J] . Journal of Wihan University of Technology(Trans portation Science & Engineering).
[7] Shitta-Bey OT, et al. The localized low-velocity impact response of aluminium honeycombs and sandwich panels for occupant head protection:experimental characterization and analytical modelling [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2007, 12(5): 549-58.
[8] Guangjian Bi, Jianping Yin, et al. Micro Fracture Behavior of Composite Honeycomb Sandwich Structure [J]. materials, 2021, 14(135): 1-12.
[9] 齐佳旗,段玥晨,李 成,等. 低速冲击下铝蜂窝夹层板的动态响应研究[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料,2019,(5):5-11.
QI Jia-gi, DUAN Yue-chen, LI Cheng,et al.Dynamic response of aluminum honeycomb sandwich plate under low speed impact[J]. FRP / Composites.2019, (5): 5-11.
[10]辛亚军,张立伟,刘小蛮,等. 蜂窝铝夹芯板动态冲击试验研究[J].机械强度. 2018,40(4):802-809.
Xin YaJun,Zhang LiWei,Liu XiaoMan,et al.Impact test on aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels[J].Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2018, 40(4): 802-809.
[11]王 震,顾文彬,原 奇,陈 姮,郝礼楷. 铝蜂窝夹芯结构爆炸罐动力响应研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(17): 222-228.
WANG Zhen, GU Wenbin, YUAN Qi, CHEN Heng, HAO Likai. Dynamic response of anti-explosion vessel with aluminium honeycomb sandwich structure. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2021, 40(17): 222-228.
[12]彭 博,税国双,汪越胜. 蜂窝夹层板结构中导波的传播特性及其脱粘损伤的检测[J]. 振动与冲击, 2019, 38(12): 140-147.
PENG Bo, SHUI Guoshuang, WANG Yuesheng. Properties of guided waves propagating in honeycomb sandwich plates and the detection of disbonding damage using ultrasonic waves. JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK, 2019, 38(12): 140-147.
[13] 蔡汗文. 军事目标易损性的工程分析[M]. 北京:北京理工大学力学工程系.
Cai Han-wen. Engineering analysis of vulnerability of military target[M]. Beijing: Department of mechanical engineering, Beijing University of technology.
[14] 午新民,翟晓丽,蒋浩征. 钨合金球侵彻多层等间隔硬铝靶实验研究[J]. 北京理工大学学报. 1997,(1):115-120.
Wu Xin-min, Zhai Xiao-li, Jiang Hao-zheng. Experimental study on penetration of tungsten alloy ball into multi-layer equal interval duralumin target[J]. Journal of Beiing Institute of Technology, 1997, (1): 115-120.
[15]Corrbett G.G. Impact loading of plates and shells by free-flying Projectiles [J]. Int J Impact Engng, 1996, (2): 141-230.
[16]王树山. 终点效应学[M]. 北京:北京科学出版社.
Wang Shusan. terminal effects[M]. Beijing: Beijing Science Press.
[1]
董国朝,许育升,韩艳,李凯. 双幅连续梁桥钢箱梁涡激振动机理分析 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(9): 237-243.
[2]
赵伟国1,2,亢艳东1,2,李清华1,2,薛子阳1,2. 叶片吸力面不同结构对离心泵空化初生的影响 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(7): 23-30.
[3]
魏培勇1,2,张社荣1,2,王超1,2,王枭华 1,2,和孙文3. 基于细观模拟的碾压混凝土尺寸效应律研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(7): 250-257.
[4]
崔莹1,2,赵均海3,屈展1,2,方军1,2. CFRP加固埋地油气管道在爆炸荷载下的损伤判定研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(6): 60-69.
[5]
汪顺生,郭新源. 基于Bentley Hammer的气囊式空气罐的水锤防护研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(6): 177-182.
[6]
杜晓庆1,唐晨馨1,赵燕2,吴葛菲1,杨骁1. 两类串列圆柱涡激振动的质量比效应 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(6): 160-168.
[7]
黄国庆1,范宇航1,姜言2. 基于改进T-B谱方法的高层建筑风致疲劳损伤分析 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(5): 243-250.
[8]
刘超1,孙启鑫1,李会驰2. 近爆作用下钢筋混凝土π梁防护性能的数值模拟 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(4): 223-231.
[9]
陶金鑫1,贾鑫1,黄正祥1,刘晓鸣2,梁仕发3,赵阳4,白晓军4. POZD涂层对防护门抗冲击性能影响研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(4): 232-238.
[10]
王菁菁1,2,张超3,刘志彬1,李浩博4. 非对称非线性质量阻尼器试验研究及鲁棒性分析 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(3): 176-182.
[11]
石原赫1,刘昆2,俞同强2,王加夏2. 基于幂律分布的浮冰生成方法及船-冰碰撞分析 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(2): 169-176.
[12]
薛茹,刘晨晨,赵雯桐,史科,张涛,管巧艳. 钢筋钢纤维混凝土梁柱节点模型化方法研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(2): 96-102.
[13]
刘秀梅1,谢永伟1,李贝贝1,贺杰2,陈劲松1. 调节阀内非定常空化压力脉动特性分析 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(19): 282-288.
[14]
印立魁1,王维占1,程瑶2,李小军3,孟凡高4,赵太勇1,陈智刚1. 局部复合药型罩威力性能数值模拟研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(18): 197-204.
[15]
赵永华1,2,阮健1,丁川1,郜峰2. 基于FLUENT的二维阀空化与压力脉动的特性研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(18): 228-235.