不同高宽比基础隔震高层结构振动台试验研究及对比分析

PDF(2559 KB)

振动与冲击 ›› 2015, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (16) : 109-118.

论文

王栋，吕西林，刘中坡

作者信息 +

Shaking table test and comparison analysis for base-isolated high-rise buildings with different aspect ratios

WANG Dong，Lü Xi-lin，LIU Zhong-po

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

为研究基础隔震高层结构的动力特性及地震响应规律，进行不同高宽比基础隔震高层结构在不同地震水准、不同地震激励下的模拟振动台试验，并与非隔震结构对比。模型采用缩尺7层钢框架结构，隔震支座用6件铅芯叠层橡胶支座，通过移动支座位置实现不同隔震高宽比。结果表明，高宽比为3、5、7基础隔震结构较非隔震结构自振周期从0.267 s分别延长至0.549 s、0.719 s、0.800 s，设防地震作用下结构顶层最大加速度响应从0.61 g减小至0.15g、0.16 g、0.18 g。隔震后上部结构整体侧移角随高宽比增大而增大，结构整体抗倾覆性能随高宽比增大而减小。用三维实体有限元模型对试验进行数值模拟分析，试验结果与数值结果吻合较好，说明试验具有良好的准确性且可反映基础隔震结构的真实动力特性。

Abstract

Duing to the development of isolation material and improvement of design concept and analysis theory, the application of base isolation is extending to high-rise buildings with large aspect ratios. In this paper, the shake table tests have been carried out to investigate the dynamic characteristics and seismic responses of high-rise base-isolated buildings with different aspect ratios when subjected to different earthquake records at various intensity. The comparison of dynamic characteristics between base-fixed and base-isolated buildings was performed simultaneously. A scaled 7-story steal frame was built as specimen model and six lead-core laminated rubber bearings were selected as isolation devices. In tests, the aspcet ratio of model can be changed by shifting the bearings. The results of the shaking table tests convey that the nature periods of base-isolated models with aspect ratios 3, 5 and 7, compared with that of base-fixed model, prolong from 0.267s to 0.549s, 0.719s and 0.800s respectively. In the other hand, the maximum peak accelerations of top story under design earthquake level decreased from 0.61g to 0.15g, 0.16g and 0.18g. Moreover, it was found that structure global drift angle increases and anti-overturning performance degenerates while increasing aspect ratio. As supplementary, a three-dimensional finite element (FE) model was created and a good consistent between results of FE analysis and test can be observed.

导出引用

王栋，吕西林，刘中坡. 不同高宽比基础隔震高层结构振动台试验研究及对比分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(16): 109-118

WANG Dong，Lü Xi-lin，LIU Zhong-po. Shaking table test and comparison analysis for base-isolated high-rise buildings with different aspect ratios[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 34(16): 109-118

参考文献

[1] 周福霖. 工程结构建筑控制[M]. 北京：地震出版社，1997:29-48.
[2] Zhou Fu-lin, Tan Ping, Wen Liu-han,et al.Earthquake M7.0 on 2013.4.12 and recent development on seismic isolation, energy dissipation & structural control in china[C]. 13th World Conference on Seismic Isolation & JSSI 20th Anniversary International Symposium[A]. Japan: The Japan Society of Seismic Isolation, 2013: 2.
[3] International Committee, JSSI. The introduction of the structural calculation method of the seismically-isolated building in Japan[EB/OL]. HTTP//:www.jssi.or.jp. 2011.
[4] 张文芳,程文,李爱群,等. 九层房屋基础滑移隔震的试验、分析及应用研究[J].建筑结构学报,2000, 21(3):60-69.
ZHANG Wen-fang, CHENG Wen-rang, LI Ai-qun, et al. Experiments, theoretical analyses and applied research on base sliding isolation of multi-story buildings[J]. Journal of
Building Structures, 2000, 21(3):60-69.
[5] Lakshmanan N, Kumar K S, Sreekala R, et al. Experimental investigations on the seismic response of a base-isolated reinforced concrete frame model[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2008, 22: 289-296.
[6] 李中锡,周锡元. 规则型隔震房屋的自振特性和地震反应分析方法[J]. 建筑科学,2001,17(5):
LI Zhong-xi, ZHOU Xi-yuan. The simplified analysis method of seismically base isolated regular buildings[J]. Building Science, 2001, 17(5):
[7] Nakazawa A, Koizumi T. Shallow N O. City tower kobe sannomiya[C]. Tykyo: The Japan Society of Seismic Isolation, 2013:3-7.
[8] Smirnov V, Eisenberg J,Dmitrovskaya L, et al. Energy dissipation and other vibration control system in russia[C]. 13th World Conference on Seismic Isolation & JSSI 20th Anniversary International Symposium[A]. Japan: The Japan Society of Seismic Isolation, 2013: 3.
[9] 付伟庆. 橡胶垫高层隔震与磁流变阻尼隔震技术[M]. 黑龙江：黑龙江大学出版社，2011:3-4
[10] Ariga T,Kanno Y,Takewaki I. Resonant behavior of base-isolated high-rise buildings under long-period ground motions[J]. The Stroctural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2006, 15: 325-338.
[11] Calugaru V,Panagiotou M. Seismic response of 20-story base-isolated and fixed-base reinforced concrete structural wall buildings at a near-fault site[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2014, 43: 927-948.
[12] Calugaru V, Panagiotou M. Response of tall cantilever wall buildings to stronge pulse-type seismic excitation[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2012, 41: 1301-1318.
[13] 赵桂峰,马玉宏,曾宾,等. 大底盘多裙房基础隔震高层建筑参数关系研究[J]. 振动与冲击,2015, 34(2):154-160.
ZHAO Gui-feng, MA Yu-hong, ZENG Bin, et al. Relationships between parameters of base isolated high-rise structure with multi-skirt building and large podium[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015,34(2):154-160.
[14] 祁皑,范宏伟. 基础隔震结构高宽比限值研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2004,25: 52-58.
QI Ai, FAN Hong-wei. Research on the height-width ratio of base isolated structure[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2004,25: 52-58.
[15] 何文福,刘文光,张颖,等. 高层隔震结构地震反应振动台试验分析[J]. 振动与冲击,2008,27(8):97-101.
Wenfu He, Wenguang Liu, Ying Zhang, et al. Experimental Study on High Rise Isolated Structure[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2008,27(8):97-101.
[16] Panagiotou M, Restrepo J I, Conte J P. Experimental seismic response of a full scale reinforced concrete wall buildings[C]. First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
[17] Chung Y L,Nagae T,Hitaka T, et al. Seismic resistance capacity of high-rise buildings subjected to long-period ground motions: e-defense shaking table test[J] Journal of Structural Engineering, 2010,136: 637-644.
[18] Takaoka E, Takenaka Y, Nimura A. Shaking table test and analysis method on ultimate behavior of slender ase-isolated structure supported by laminated rubber bearings[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2011, 40: 551-570.
[19] GB 50011-2010,建筑抗震设计规范[S].
[20] Freakley P K,Payne A R. Theory and practice of engineering with rubber[M]. London U.K.: Applied Science Publish, 1978: 96-104.