串列双幅典型断面三分力系数气动干扰效应

刘志文,陈政清

振动与冲击 ›› 2015, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5) : 6-13.

PDF(4607 KB)
PDF(4607 KB)
振动与冲击 ›› 2015, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5) : 6-13.
论文

串列双幅典型断面三分力系数气动干扰效应

  • 采用风洞试验与数值模拟相结合的方法对串列双幅典型断面(矩形断面、Π型断面及流线型断面)三分力系数和斯脱罗哈数的气动干扰效应进行了研究。首先针对宽高比为5的单幅矩形断面分别进行了三分力系数的数值模拟和风洞试验测试,数值模拟结果与风洞试验结果吻合良好;然后对串列双幅典型断面不同间距比D/B(D为双幅断面之间净间距,B为单幅断面宽度)对应的三分力系数及斯脱罗哈数进行了数值模拟。研究显示:上游断面阻力系数与单幅断面比较接近,下游断面阻力系数则随间距比D/B的增加而增加;上游断面升力系数、升力矩系数脉动根方差气动干扰因子明显小于下游断面升力系数脉动根方差气动干扰因子,两者均随间距比D/B先增加后减小。
作者信息 +

Aerodynamic interference effects on aerostatic coefficients of typical sections in tandem arrangement

  • Aerodynamic interference effects on aerostatic coefficients and Strouhal numbers of two sections in tandem, namely, two rectangular sections in tandem, two Π-type sections in tandem and two streamlined sections in tandem, were investigated using numerical methods and wind tunnel tests. To validate the accuracy of the numerical methods, the numerical simulation of flow passing a fixed rectangular section with a width-to-depth ratio of 5 was carried out, and the numerical results agree well with the experimental results. Totally, two rectangular sections in tandem, two Π-shaped sections in tandem and two streamlined sections in tandem with a varying separation ratio of D/B(D is the net distance between two sections in tandem, B is the width of the single section) were simulated separately with numerical methods. The results show that the drag coefficients of windward section is close to that of the single section, the drag coefficients of leeward section increase with the increasing of D/B. The RMS of lift and pitching moment coefficients of windward are significantly less than that of the leeward section, and they first increase and then decrease with the increasing of D/B. 
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

采用风洞试验与数值模拟相结合的方法对串列双幅典型断面(矩形断面、Π型断面及流线型断面)三分力系数和斯脱罗哈数的气动干扰效应进行了研究。首先针对宽高比为5的单幅矩形断面分别进行了三分力系数的数值模拟和风洞试验测试,数值模拟结果与风洞试验结果吻合良好;然后对串列双幅典型断面不同间距比D/B(D为双幅断面之间净间距,B为单幅断面宽度)对应的三分力系数及斯脱罗哈数进行了数值模拟。研究显示:上游断面阻力系数与单幅断面比较接近,下游断面阻力系数则随间距比D/B的增加而增加;上游断面升力系数、升力矩系数脉动根方差气动干扰因子明显小于下游断面升力系数脉动根方差气动干扰因子,两者均随间距比D/B先增加后减小。

Abstract

Aerodynamic interference effects on aerostatic coefficients and Strouhal numbers of two sections in tandem, namely, two rectangular sections in tandem, two Π-type sections in tandem and two streamlined sections in tandem, were investigated using numerical methods and wind tunnel tests. To validate the accuracy of the numerical methods, the numerical simulation of flow passing a fixed rectangular section with a width-to-depth ratio of 5 was carried out, and the numerical results agree well with the experimental results. Totally, two rectangular sections in tandem, two Π-shaped sections in tandem and two streamlined sections in tandem with a varying separation ratio of D/B(D is the net distance between two sections in tandem, B is the width of the single section) were simulated separately with numerical methods. The results show that the drag coefficients of windward section is close to that of the single section, the drag coefficients of leeward section increase with the increasing of D/B. The RMS of lift and pitching moment coefficients of windward are significantly less than that of the leeward section, and they first increase and then decrease with the increasing of D/B. 

关键词

串列双幅断面 / 三分力系数 / 气动干扰效应 / 数值模拟 / 风洞试验

Key words

two sections in tandem arrangement / aerostatic coefficients / aerodynamic interference effects / numerical simulations / wind tunnel experiments

引用本文

导出引用
刘志文,陈政清. 串列双幅典型断面三分力系数气动干扰效应[J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(5): 6-13
Liu Zhiwen, Chen Zhengqing. Aerodynamic interference effects on aerostatic coefficients of typical sections in tandem arrangement[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 34(5): 6-13

参考文献

[1] Zdravkovich M M. Review of flow interference between two cylinders in various arrangement[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1977, 99: 618-633
[2] Matsumoto M., Shiraishi N., Shirato H. Aerodynamic instabilities of twin circular cylinders[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1990, 33: 91-100
[3] Alam M. M., Zhou Y. Strouhal numbers, forces and flow structures around two tandem cylinders of different diameters[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2008, 24: 505-526
[4] Liu Xianzhi, Levitan Marc. Nikitopoulos Dimitris. Wind tunnel tests for mean drag and lift coefficients on multiple circular cylinders arranged in-line[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2008, 96: 831-839
[5] Sumner D., Richards M.D., Akosile O.O. Strouhal number data for two staggered circular cylinders[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2008, 96: 859-871
[6] Rowan A I, Stoyan S. XIE J. M., et al. Tacoma narrows 50 years later wind engineering investigations for parallel bridges[J]. Bridge Structures: Assessment, Design and construction, 2005, 1(1): 3-17
[7] Honda Akihiro, Shiraishi Naruhito, Matsumoto Masaru, Fuse Yoichi et al., Aerodynamic stability of Kansai International Airport access bridge[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1993, 49(1~3): 533-542
[8] Kimura K., Shima K., Sano, K., et al. Effects of separation distance on wind-induced response of parallel box girders[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2008, 96: 954-962
[9] 刘志文 陈政清 刘高等. 双幅桥面桥梁三分力系数气动干扰效应试验研究[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 35(1): 16-20
   Liu Zhiwen, Chen Zhengqing, Liu Gao et al. Experimental Study of Aerodynamic interference effects on aerostatic coefficients of twin decks bridges[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural science edition), 2008, 35(1): 16-20 (in Chinese)
[10] 刘志文, 陈政清. 胡建华等. 大跨度双幅桥面桥梁气动干扰效应[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 28(6): 55-59
    Liu Zhiwen, Cheng Zhengqing, Hu Jianhua et al. Aerodynamic interference effects of large span bridge with twin decks[J]. Journal of Chang’an University (Natural science edition), 2008, 28(6): 55-59 (in Chinese) 
[11] 刘志文, 栗小祜, 陈政清. 均匀流场串列双矩形断面涡激振动气动干扰试验研究[J]. 中国公路学报,2010, Vol.23(5): 44-50
    Liu Zhiwen, Li Xiaohu, Chen Zhengqing. Experiment of Aerodynamic interference on vortex-induced vibration of two rectangular cylinders in tandem in smooth flow field[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2010, 23(5): 44-50 (in Chinese)
[12] 刘志文,陈政清,栗小祜等. 串列双流线型断面涡激振动气动干扰试验[J]. 中国公路学报,2010,Vol.24(3),51-57
Liu Zhiwen, Chen Zhengqing, Li Xiaohu, et al. Aerodynamic interference test on vortex-induced vibration of two streamline cylinders in tandem[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2011, 24(3): 51-57 (in Chinese)
[13] 郭震山,孟晓亮,周奇,朱乐东. 既有桥梁对临近新建桥梁三分力系数气动干扰效应[J]. 工程力学,2010, 27(9): 181-186
    Guo Zhenshan, Meng Xiaoliang, Zhou qi et al. Aerodynamic interference effects of an existed bridge on aerodynamic coefficients of an adjacent new bridge[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2010, 27(9): 181-186 (in Chinese)
[14] Larsen A. Advances in aeroelastic analyses of suspension and cable-stayed bridges[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1998, 74-76: 73-90
[15] Matsumoto M, Shirato H, Araki K, et al. Spanwise coherence characteristics of surface pressure field on 2-D bluff bodies[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2003, 91: 155-163
[16] Schewe G., 2009. Reynolds-number-effects in flow around a rectangular cylinder with aspect ratio 1:5[C]//Borri C., Augusti G., Bartoli G. Proceedings of Fifth European and African Conference on Wind Engineering, Florence: Firenze University Press, 2009 

PDF(4607 KB)

1022

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/