近场地震作用下RC框架鲁棒性分析

杜永峰1,2,宋翔1,包超1,朱翔1,谈志鸿1

振动与冲击 ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3) : 192-197.

PDF(1357 KB)
PDF(1357 KB)
振动与冲击 ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3) : 192-197.
论文

近场地震作用下RC框架鲁棒性分析

  • 杜永峰1,2,宋翔1,包超1,朱翔1,谈志鸿1
作者信息 +

Analysis on robustness of RC frame structure subject to near-field ground motions

  • Du Yongfeng1,2, Song Xiang1, Bao Chao1, Zhu Xiang1, Tan Zhihong1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

基于地震作用下结构的受力的特征,提出构件易损性及重要性系数的改进计算方法,以此定量分析结构在近场地震作用下的鲁棒性。通过分析比较RC框架在近场有无速度脉冲两组地震动,不同强度下的构件易损性系数、重要性系数和结构鲁棒性系数,揭示了RC框架结构在近场地震作用下抗连续倒塌鲁棒性的特点,并依此提出增强结构鲁棒性的措施。研究表明:相比于层间位移角等结构的整体响应指标,鲁棒性则更能具体地反应出结构在近场地震下的状态;与近场无速度脉冲型地震动相比,速度脉冲型地震动会对结构构件的易损性与重要性造成更为明显的影响,从而降低了整体结构的鲁棒性,对结构安全存在更为不利的影响。

Abstract

Based on the mechanics characteristics of structure subjected to seismic action, an improved calculation method for coefficients of vulnerability and importance of constructional element was proposed in order to analyze the structural robustness under near-field earthquake. Two groups of ground motions, with or without velocity pulses, were applied to reinforced concrete frame structure and the coefficients of vulnerability, importance and robustness of element were also compared under different seismic intensities, which aimed to reveal the characteristics of structural robustness representing the ability of resisting progressive collapse and propose relative measures to enhance the structural robustness. The results show that the robustness can reflect the state of structure subjected to seismic action better than other response indexes such as the story-drift angel. The seismic action with velocity pulses has more evident impacts on the vulnerability and importance of structure than that without velocity pulses and can reduce the structural robustness, causing a more adverse effect on the structural safety.
 

关键词

近场地震动 / RC框架结构 / 构件易损性系数 / 构件重要性系数 / 结构鲁棒性

Key words

near-field earthquakes / reinforced concrete frame / member vulnerability coefficient / member importance coefficient / structural robustness

引用本文

导出引用
杜永峰1,2,宋翔1,包超1,朱翔1,谈志鸿1. 近场地震作用下RC框架鲁棒性分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(3): 192-197
Du Yongfeng1,2, Song Xiang1, Bao Chao1, Zhu Xiang1, Tan Zhihong1. Analysis on robustness of RC frame structure subject to near-field ground motions[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(3): 192-197

参考文献

[1] 李爽,谢礼立.近场脉冲型地震动对钢筋混凝土框架结构影响[J]. 沈阳建筑大学学报:自然科学版,2006,22(03):406-410.
Li Shuang , Xie Lili.Effects of near-field pulse-like ground motions on reinforced concrete frame structures [J]. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University: Natural Science ,2006 ,22(3): 406-410(in Chinese)
[2] 陈波,谢俊举,温增平. 汶川地震近断层地震动作用下结构地震响应特征分析[J]. 地震学报,2013.35(2):250-261.
Chen Bo ,Xie Junju ,Wen Zengping. 2013. Analysis of the seismic response characteristics of building structure subjected to near-fault ground motions from Wenchuan earthquake. Acta Seismological Sinica ,35(2):250-261(in Chinese)
[3] 赵凤新,韦韬,张郁山. 近场速度脉冲对钢筋混凝土框架结构地震反应的影响[J].工程力学,2008. 25(10):180-187 .
Zhao Fengxin,Wei Tao,Zhang Yushan. Influence of near-fault velocity pulse on the seismic response of reinforced concrete frame.[J] Engineering Mechanics. 2008.25(10):180-187(in Chinese)
[4] The Standing Committee on Structural Safety(SCOSS).10th Report of SCOSS[R]. London:SETO Ltd,1994.
[5] American Society of Civil Engineers(ASCE).Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.New York,ASCE 7-05,2006,23-42.
[6] 李明,谢礼立,翟长海,等.近场地震动区域的划分[J].地震工程与工程振动2009,29(5):20-25.
Li Ming ,Xie Lili , Zhai Changhai et al. Scope division of near-fault ground motion [J]. Earquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,2009,29(5):20-25(in Chinese)
[7] Baker JW.Quantitative classification of near fault ground motions using wavelet analysis. Bulletin of seismological society of America,2007,97(5):1486-1501.
[8] 孙柏涛,张桂欣. 汶川8.0级地震中各类建筑结构地震易损性统计分析[J]. 土木工程学报,2012,05:26-30.
Sun Baitao,Zhang Guixin.Statistical analysis of the seismic vulnerability of various types of building structures in Wenchuan M8.0 erathquake[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal 2012,05:26-30.(in Chinese).
[9] 金波,高永武,陈洪富,等. 芦山“4•20”地震单层砖柱工业厂房的震害分析与研究[J]. 自然灾害学报,2013,03:1-8.
Jin Bo , Gao Yongwu ,Chen Hongfu , et al. Primary damage analysis and study of the“4.20”Lushan earthquake on single-story factory buildings with brick column.[J].Journal of Catastrophology 2013,03:1-8.(in Chinese).
[10] 叶列平,林旭川,曲哲,等.基于广义结构刚度的构件重要性评价方法研究[J].建筑科学与工程学报, 2010,27(1):1-6, 20.
Ye Lieping,Lin Xuchuan,QuZhe,et al.Method of evaluating element importance of structure system based on the generalized structural stiffness [J]. Journal of Architectural and Civil Engineering,2010,27( 1):1-6, 20. ( in Chinese).
[11] 黄靓,王蓥,陈永亮,等.一种简化的结构鲁棒性量化方法[J].工程力学,2013,30(10):46-53.
Huang Liang,Wang Ying,Chen Yongliang,et al.A quantification method of structural robustness[J].Engineering Mechanics , 2013,30(10):46-53.(in Chinese)
[12] 柳承茂,刘西拉. 基于刚度的构件重要性评估及其与冗余度的关系[J].上海交通大学学报,2005, 39( 5) : 746-750.
Liu Chengmao,Liu Xila. Stiffness-based evaluation of component importance and its relationship with redundancy[J].Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University,2005,39 ( 5) : 746-750( in Chinese).
[13] 黄冀卓,王湛.钢框架结构鲁棒性评估方法[J].土木工程学报,2012,45(9):46-54.
Huang Jizhuo,Wang Zhan.An approach for evaluation of the structural robustness of steel frames[J].China Civil Engineering Journal,2012,45(9):46-54.(in Chinese).
[14] 黄靓,李龙.一种结构鲁棒性量化方法[J].工程力学,2012,29(8):213-219.
Huang Liang,Li Long. A quantification method of structural robustness[J].Engineering Mechanics,2012,29(8):213-219.(in Chinese).
[15] 杜永峰,包超,宋翔,等.结构抗连续倒塌鲁棒性简化分析方法.[C]//第三届建筑结构抗倒塌学术交流会.哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2014,65-70.
Du Yongfeng, Bao Chao,Song Xiang,et al.A simplified method of structural robustness to resist progressive collapse[C]//The third Symposium of building structure to anti earthquake. Harbin:Harbin institute of technology,2014,65-70.(in Chinese)
[16] 陆新征, 林旭川, 叶列平,等. 地震下高层建筑连续倒塌数值模型研究[J]. 工程力学, 2010, 27(11): 64-70.
Lu Xinzheng, Lin Xuchuan, Ye Lieping, et al. Numerical models for earthquake induced progressive collapse of high-rise buildings [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2010, 27(11): 64-70.(in Chinese).

PDF(1357 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/