传统结构构件设计较少考虑碰撞效应，因此有可能因碰撞荷载而引起严重的冲击破坏。鉴于此，在前期提出的刚柔复合防护结构体系的基础上，针对钢筋混凝土复合防护梁的抗撞性能进行了分析研究。在数值模拟的过程中，分别考虑了无防护、刚性防护、柔性防护和刚柔复合防护四种不同的措施以及两端固支、两端铰支和一端固支一端铰支三种不同的梁端约束形式。通过观测钢筋混凝土梁的应变、位移、加速度和冲击力等参数，可评价相应的抗撞效果。数值结果表明，提议的复合防护体系效果最好，可以有效抑制受撞构件的冲击响应；同时，构件约束形式对抗撞性能的影响也是不容忽视的。
Abstract
Traditional design of structural members considers less collision effects, so it may be possible to cause damage due to impact loads. In view of this, impact-resistant performance of the steel reinforced concrete beam with the rigid-flexible composite structure was analyzed based on the earlier research outcomes. In the numerical simulation of the process, the observed beams with four different measures including the unprotected, the rigid protective, the flexible protective and the proposed one were considered separately. Meanwhile, three considered constraint forms of the beam ends were as follows: fixed at both ends, hinged at both ends, fixed at one end and hinged at the other end. Protective effects of the different measures were evaluated by observing the strain, the displacement, the acceleration and the impact force of the target beam. Numerical results show that the proposed protective system works best. Moreover, the constraint forms of the structural components also have a significant impact on the protective effects.
关键词
抗撞 /
冲击荷载 /
复合防护 /
钢筋混凝土梁 /
数值模拟
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
impact resistance /
impact load /
composite laminate /
reinforced concrete beam /
numerical simulation
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 周泽平, 王明洋, 冯淑芳, 等. 钢筋混凝土梁在低速冲击下的变形与破坏研究[J]. 振动与冲击，2007, 26(5): 99-103.
ZHOU Ze-ping, WANG Ming-yang, FENG Shu-fang, et al. Deformation and failure of a reinforced beam under low velocity impact [J]. Journal of Vibration And Shock, 2007, 26(5): 99-103.
[2] Wang Y, Qian X D, Liew R J Y, et al. Experimental behavior of cement filled pipe-in-pipe composite structures under transverse impact [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2014, 72: 1–16.
[3] Ivañez I, Barbero E, Saez S S. Analytical study of the low-velocity impact response of composite sandwich beams [J]. Composite Structures, 2014, 111: 459–467.
[4] Somasundaram D S, Trabia M B, O'Toole B J, et al. A methodology for predicting high impact shock propagation within bolted-joint structures [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2014, 73: 30–42.
[5] Aminanda Y, Castanie´B, Barrau J J, et al. Experimental and numerical study of compression after impact of sandwich structures with metallic skins [J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2009, 69: 50–59.
[6] Nakamoto H, Adachi T, Araki W. In-plane impact behavior of honeycomb structures randomly filled with rigid inclusions [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36: 73–80.
[7] Wang D. Impact behavior and energy absorption of paper honeycomb sandwich panels [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36: 110–114.
[8] Cho S R, Truong D D, Shin H K. Repeated lateral impacts on steel beams at room and sub-zero temperatures [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2014, 72: 75-84.
[9] Jiang H, Chorzepa M G. Aircraft impact analysis of nuclear safety-related concrete structures: A review [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2014, 46: 118–133.
[10] 李媛. 设有复合防护层的结构构件抗撞性能分析[D]. 北京：北京科技大学，2012
LI Yuan. Analysis of the Impact Resistant Performance of Structural Members with Composite Protective Layer [D]. Beijing: University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2012.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
PDF(2226 KB)
