框架-剪力墙结构基于地震强度的新一代抗震性能评估方法研究

PDF(1700 KB)

振动与冲击 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (10) : 140-148.

论文

朱汉波 1，梁兴文2，党英杰3

作者信息 +

The new generation of seismic performance evaluationfor frame - shear wall structure based on intensity

ZHU Han-bo1，LIANG Xing-wen2，DANGYing-jie3

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

近几年来，在一些发达国家，基于概率理论的新一代抗震性能评估方法已开始用于特定建筑物的抗震性能评估。研究基于全概率理论的新一代抗震性能评估方法，并将其应用于我国建筑结构的抗震性能评估，对于减灾防灾和提高建筑结构的抗震性能有重要意义。本文以FEMA P-58的抗震性能评估流程为框架，结合我国建筑结构的特点和规范要求，以某一单个建筑物为对象，采用有限元分析软件PERFORM 3D和抗震经济性能评估分析软件PACT，用增量动力分析（IDA）方法进行建筑物各个强度状态的易损性分析；用基于强度的性能评估方法，依据构件易损性分组和人员流动模型，得到包括人员伤亡、修复和重建造价以及居住中断时间等建筑性能的概率分布，为我国建筑结构的抗震性能评估提供了参考。

Abstract

Recently, a new generation of seismic performance evaluation methodbased on the total probability theory has made great development in the world，which has been used in some specific buildingsof advanced countries. The seismic performance evaluation method is more scientific and reasonable than the existing method. Research on the new generation of seismic behavior evaluation methods by the total probability theory, and applicationto the seismic performance assessment of buildingshas good theoretical significance and practical value to mitigate the earthquake disaster and improve the seismic performance of structures .Based on the framework of seismic performance evaluation process in the FEMA P -58 combining with the characteristics of China's building structure and specification requirements, and based on the seismic performance of the total probability evaluation ideas for a individual building. The vulnerability of building was analyzed and evaluated using the incremental dynamic analysis (IDA)methodby the finite element analysis software(PERFORM 3D) and seismic performance assessment analysis software(PACT) .Using Intensity-based assessments methods, to get the building performance probability distributions included casualties, restoration and reconstruction cost and the break period by using component fragility and performance groups and population models.

导出引用

朱汉波1,梁兴文2，党英杰3. 框架-剪力墙结构基于地震强度的新一代抗震性能评估方法研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(10): 140-148

ZHU Han-bo1，LIANG Xing-wen2，DANGYing-jie3. The new generation of seismic performance evaluationfor frame - shear wall structure based on intensity[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(10): 140-148

参考文献

[1] FEMA (1997) Nehrp Guidelines For The Seismic Rehabilitation of BuildingsFederal Emergency Management Agency. No. FEMA 273 /Octorber1997,Washington, D.C.
[2] FEMA (1997) Nehrp Commentary on The Guidelines for The SeismicRehabilitation of Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency. No. FEMA274 / Octorber 1997, Washington, D.C.
[3] FEMA (2012) Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings (Volume 1 –Methodology), prepared by the Applied Technology Council for the FederalEmergency Management Agency, Report No. FEMA P-58-1 / September 2012,Washington, D.C.
[4] FEMA (2012) Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings (Volume 2–Implementation Guide), prepared by the Applied Technology Council for theFederal Emergency Management Agency, Report No. FEMA P-58-2 / September2012, Washington, D.C.
[5] 陆新征,叶列平.基于 IDA 分析的结构抗地震倒塌能力研究[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造, 2010，32(1): 13~18.
LUXin-zhen, YE Lie-ping. Study on Seismic Collapse Resistance of Structural System[J].Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 2010,32(1): 13~18.
[6] 雷拓,钱江,刘伯权.既有钢筋混凝土框架结构基于性能的抗震评估[J].工程抗震与加固改造，2013,35(3): 113~120.
LEITuo, QIANG Jiang, LIU Bo-quan. Performance-based Seismic Evaluation of Existing RC Frame Structures[J].Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 2013,35(3): 113~120.
[7] 郑山锁,杨威,杨丰,孙龙飞,侯丕吉.基于多元增量动力分析（MIDA）方法的RC核心筒结构地震易损性分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2015,34(1): 117~123.
ZHENGShan-suo, YANG Wei, YANG Feng, SUN Long-fei, HOU Pi-ji. Seismic fragility analysis for RC core walls structure based on MIDA method [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015,34(1): 117~123.
[8] 徐强,郑山锁,程洋,韩言昭,田进.基于结构损伤的在役钢框架地震易损性研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2015，34(6): 162~167.
XU Qiang, ZHENG Shan-suo, CHENG Yang, HAN Yan-zhao, TIAN Jin. Seismic vulnerability of steel framework in service based on structural damage [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015，34(6): 162~167.
[9] 陈猛,沈祖炎.钢框架结构基于概率抗震性能评估[J].建筑结构, 2012,42(3):57~60.
CHENMeng, SHENZu-yan. Probabilistic Performance-based seismic evaluation of steel frame[J]. Building Structure, 2012,42(3):57~60.
[10] 崔杰.典型框剪结构基于 IDA 方法的地震易损性及经济性分析[D].重庆大学硕士学位论文,2014(5)
CUIJie.Analysis on Seismic Fragility and Economicfor Typical Frame-Shear Wall StructureBased on the IDA Method[D].A Thesis Submitted to Chongqing Universityin Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement,2014(5)
[11] 门进杰,史庆轩.竖向不规则钢筋混凝土框架结构基于性能的抗震评估方法[J].振动与冲击, 2011,30(6):114~119.
MEN Jin-jie,SHI Qing-xuan.New method for performance based seismic evaluation of vertically irregular reinforced concrete frame structures[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock,2011,30(6):114~119.
[12] 北京金土木软件技术有限公司.SAP2000中文版使用指南（第二版）[M].人民交通出版社
Beijing Jintuwu Software Technology Co., Ltd. the Chinese Version of SAP2000 User Guide[M].China Communication Press
[13] 曾明.PERFORM-3D 基本操作与实例[M].中国铁道出版社
Zeng Ming. A basic operation &examples of PERFORM-3D[M].China Railway Publishing House
[14] 刘博文.PERFORM 3D 在抗震弹塑性分析与结构性能评估中的应用[M].中国建筑工业出版社2014(5):188~214;245~246;附录 6,7,8,9,11
LIU Bo-wen. Seismic Elastic-plastic Analysis and Performance-basedEvaluation withPerform-3D[M].China Building Industry Press.2014(5 ):188~214;245~246;Appendix 6,7,8,9,11
[15] 中华人民共和国国家标准.混凝土结构设计规范 GB50010-2010[S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2010
National Standard of PRC. Code for design of concrete structures GB50010-2010 [S]BeiJing:China Building Industry Press，2010
[16] B.D.Scott,R.Park,M.J.N.Priestiey Stress-Strain Behavior of ConcreteConfined by Over lapping Hoops at Low and High Strain Rates[J] ACI JOURNAL1982
[17] F. Mola, L.M. Pellegrini The New Model For Creep Of Concrete In Fip ModelCode 2010[S] 37th Conference on OUR WORLD IN CONCRETE &STRUCTURES.2012(8)
[18] Alfonso v u lcano , vitelmov.bertero. Analytical models for predicting thelateral response of RCshear walls- evaluation of their reliability [R].ReportNo.UCB/EERC-87/19
[19] 中华人民共和国国家标准.建筑抗震设计规范 GB50011-2010[S].北京：中国建筑出版社，2010
National Standard of PRC. Code for seismic design of buildings GB50010-2010 [S]BeiJing:China Building Industry Press，2010
[20] FEMA356. Prestandard And Commentary For The Seismic Rehabilitation OfBuildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA 356 /November.2000, Washington, D.C.
[21] FEMA (2012) Supporting Electronic Materials and BackgroundDocumentation Federal Emergency Management Agency No FEMA P-58-3 /September 2012
[22] 建筑设计资料集编委会.建筑设计资料集（第二版）[M].中国建筑工业出版社 1994
Architectural design data collection board.The Sourcebook of Architecture(second edition)[M].1994
[23] NISTIR 6389, UNIFORMAT II Elemental Classification for BuildingSpecifications, Cost Estimating and Cost Analysis (NIST, 1999)
[24] 李赫,罗超英,刘军,朱忠义,苗启松.中美抗震规范的差异对比研究[J].建筑结构,2011 41(3):123~126
LIHe，LUOChao-ying，LIUJun，ZHUZhong-yi，MIAO Qi-song. Analysis of differences between Chinese code and American code for seismic design[J].Building Structure,2011 41(3):123~126
[25] ACI Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI-318 11)[s]Americal Concrete Insitute 2011
[26] 邵辉.美国设计规范 IBC2000 和 UBC97 对抗震设计的差异浅析[J].建筑设计, 2009 30(4):53~56
SHAOHui.Analysis of Differences between American Design Code IBC 2000 [J]Pharmaceutical & Engineering Design, 2009 30(4):53~56