通过有限次数的实验结合模型确认方法对数值模型的可靠性进行验证，建立了考虑参数不确定性碳纤维复合材料冲击响应的数值模型确认方法；以碳纤维增强复合材料（T700/X105）试件沿厚度方向受到冲击的数值模型确认过程为例，基于累积分布函数的模型确认准则，对三种不同工况下碳纤维复合材料的数值模型进行了确认分析，验证了所建立的模型确认方法的有效性，为具有不确定性的碳纤维复合材料的数值模型确认提供新的思路和参考方案。
Abstract
The reliability of the numerical model is verified by the limited experiments combined with the model validation method. A numerical model validation method for the impact response of carbon fiber composite with uncertain parameters is established. Taking the numerical model validation process for the impact of carbon fiber reinforced composite samples (T700/X105) along the thickness direction as an example. Based on the cumulative distribution function model validation criteria, the analysis for numerical model validation of carbon fiber composite under three different conditions is conducted and the validity of the established model validation method is verified. It offers new thought and reference for numerical model validation of carbon fiber composite with uncertainty.
关键词
碳纤维复合材料 /
冲击响应 /
参数不确定性 /
模型确认
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
carbon fiber reinforced composite /
impact response /
parameter uncertainty /
model validation
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 阮文斌，吕震宙，安军，等. 不确定条件下复合材料结构的全局灵敏度分析[J].复合材料学报，2014：699-706.
RUAN Wen-bin, LYU Zhen-zhou, AN Jun, et al. Global sensitivity analysis for composite structures with uncertainties [J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2014:699-706.
[2] C.A. Conceicao António , L.N. Hoffbaue. Uncertainty assessment approach for composite structures based on global sensitivity indices [J]. Composite Structures, 2013: 202-212.
[3] 张伟，韩旭，刘杰，等. 一种基于正交试验设计的土中爆炸数值模型确认方法[J]. 工程力学, 2013(3). 49(2): 58-65.
ZHANG Wei, HAN Xu, LIU Jie, et al. A method for model validation of underground explosion based on the orthogonal experimental design [J]. Engineering mechanics. 2013(3). 49(2):58-65
[4] 宗周红，高铭霖，夏樟华. 基于健康监测的连续刚构桥有限元模型确认(Ⅰ)——基于响应面法的有限元模型修正[J]. 土木工程学报, 2011(02): 90-98.
ZONG Zhou-hong, GAO Ming-lin, XIA Zhang-hua. Finite element model validation of the continuous rigid frame bridge based on structural health monitoring PartⅠ:FE model updating based on the response surface method[J]. China civil engineering journal, 2011(02): 90-98.
[5] American Society of Mechanical Engineers. ASME V&V20-2009, standard for verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics and heat transfer[S]. New York ASME，2009.
[6] American Society of Mechanical Engineers. ASME V&V10.1-2012，an illustration of the concepts of verification and validation in computational solid mechanics[S]. New York ASME，2012.
[7] 陈志国，邓忠民，毕司峰. 基于Monte Carlo法的结构动力学模型确认[J]. 振动与冲击,2013. 32(16): 76-81.
CHEN Zhi-guo, DENG Zhong-min, BI Si-feng .Structural dynamics model validation based on Monte Carlo method[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock,2013. 32(16): 76-81.
[8] 张冬冬, 郭勤涛. Kriging响应面代理模型在有限元模型确认中的应用[J]. 振动与冲击,2013.32(9): 187-191.
ZHANG Dong-dong, GUO Qin-tao. Application of Kriging response surface in finite element model validation [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2013.32(9): 187-191.
[9] 詹振飞，胡洁，符雁，等. 虚拟样机环境下不确定性多元动态系统模型验证[J]. 机械工程学报, 2012. 48(5): 138-146.
ZHAN Zhen-fei, Hu Jie, Fu Yan , et al. Bayesian based model validation method for uncertain multivariate dynamic systems under virtual prototype environment[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2012. 48(5): 138-146.
[10] 肖钊，韩旭，杨刚. .基于区间技术的模型确认方法及运用 [J].机械工程学报，2014.50(14)：177-184.
XIAO Zhao, HAN Xu, YANG Gang . Model validation method and its application based on the interval techniques [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock,2014.14(50)：177-184.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
PDF(1112 KB)
