不同类型连梁框架-核心筒结构抗震性能研究

PDF(2072 KB)

振动与冲击 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12) : 169-174.

论文

袁世聪1 ，蒋欢军2,3

作者信息 +

Study on Seismic Behaviour of Frame-Core Tube Structure with Different Types of Coupling Beams

YUAN Shicong 1 JIANG Huanjun 2,3

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

为了研究不同类型连梁对结构抗震性能的影响，利用结构性能评价软件PERFORM-3D对两个设置不同类型连梁的钢筋混凝土框架-核心筒结构进行模态分析、反应谱分析和不同水准地震作用下的动力时程分析。以结构的动力特性、力和位移响应、罕遇地震下结构弹塑性耗能组成和损伤等指标作为性能评估参数，对比分析了不同类型连梁对框架-核心筒结构抗震性能的影响。研究结果表明，不同类型连梁耗能能力相差较大，对框架-核心筒结构的抗震性能有较大影响，设置了弯曲型连梁的框架-核心筒结构在罕遇地震下的塑性耗能主要由连梁提供，核心筒本身具有二道抗震防线，其整体抗震性能优于设置剪切型连梁的结构。

Abstract

The influence of different types of coupling beams on seismic performance of frame core-tube structure was studied by the modal analysis, response spectrum analysis and time-history analysis of two RC frame-core tube structures with different types of coupling beams under different levels of earthquake ground motions with the aid of the structural analysis software PERFORM-3D. The effects of the type of coupling beams on the seismic performance of the structures were analyzed by comparing the performance parameters such as the structural dynamic characteristics, displacement and force responses of the structures, the dissipated energy and the structural damage of the structures under the rare earthquake. The study indicates that the energy-dissipation capacity of different type of coupling beams is considerably different, and the type of coupling beams has significant effect on the overall seismic performance of the structure. The input seismic energy is mostly dissipated by the flexure-dominant coupling beams so that the core tube itself has dual seismic defense lines. The seismic performance of the structure with the flexure-dominating coupling beams is better than that of the structure with shear-dominating coupling beams.

导出引用

袁世聪1,蒋欢军2,3. 不同类型连梁框架-核心筒结构抗震性能研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(12): 169-174

YUAN Shicong 1 JIANG Huanjun 2,3 . Study on Seismic Behaviour of Frame-Core Tube Structure with Different Types of Coupling Beams[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(12): 169-174

参考文献

[1] JGJ3-2010. 高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程[S]. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
JGJ3-2010 Technical specification for concrete structures of tall building [S]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2010.
[2] 钱稼茹, 魏勇, 蔡益燕, 等. 钢框架-混凝土核心筒结构框架地震设计剪力标准值研究[J], 建筑结构, 2008, 38(3) :1-5.
QIAN Jiaru, WEI yong, CAI Yiyan, et al. Study on Seismic Design Shear Force for Frame of Steel Frame-concrete Core Wall Structures [J]. Building structure, 2008, 38(3): 1-5.
[3] 楚留声, 赵更歧, 白国良, 等. 高烈度区型钢混凝土框架-核心混凝土筒体混合结构协同受力性能研究[J], 工业建筑, 2010, 40(5): 7-12.
CHU Liusheng, ZHAO Gengqi, BAI Guoliang,et al. Research on Cooperative Bearing Performance of SRC Frame-RC Core Wall Hybrid Structure in High Seismic Intensity Region [J]. Industrial Construction, 2010, 40(5): 7-12.
[4] 刘阳冰, 刘晶波, 韩强. 组合框架-核心筒结构地震反应初步规律研究[J], 河海大学学报（自然科学版）, 2011, 39(2): 148-158.
LIU Yangbing, LIU Jingbo, HAN Qiang. Preliminary study on seismic response of composite frame-core wall structures [S]. Journal of Hohai University(Natural Sciences), 2011, 39(2): 148-158.
[5] 王一贤. 钢框架-混凝土核心筒结构抗震性能分析[D], 成都：西南交通大学, 2010: 40-67.
WANG Yixian. The seismic performance analysis of sleel frame-RC core wall structure [D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University , 2010: 40-67.
[6] 苏金凌, 秦荣. 中国-东盟国际商贸物流中心超高层结构静力弹塑性分析[J], 广西大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 37(4): 623-629.
SU Jinling, QIN Rong. A static elastic-plastic analysis on China-ASEAN international trade logistics center [J]. Journal of Guangxi University(Natural Science Edition), 2012, 37(4): 623-629.
[7] 张淑云, 白国良, 高志刚, 等. 高层组合框架-混凝土筒体混合结构静力数值分析[J], 西安科技大学学报, 2010, 40(5): 36-40.
ZHANG Shuyun, BAI Guoliang, GAO Zhigang, et al. Static characteristics of Core-RC and composite frame hybrid structures in high-rise buildings [J], Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology, 2010, 40(5): 36-40.
[8] DGJ08-9-2013. 建筑抗震设计规程[S]. 上海：2013.
DGJ08-9-2013. Code for seismic design of buildings [s]. Shanghai: 2013.
[9] 徐晓珂, 刘伟庆, 王曙光, 等. 不同连梁跨高比框架-核心筒结构抗震性能分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2010, 43(增刊): 54-60.
XU Xiaoke, LIU Weiqing, WANG Shuguang, at al. Analysis of seismic behavior of frame-core tube structure with various span-depth ratio of coupling beam [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2010, 43(S), 54-60.
[10] American Society of Civil Engineer. Prestandard and Commentary for The Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings[R]. Report No. FEMA356, Washington, D.C., 2000.
[11] 徐培福, 傅学怡, 王翠坤, 等. 复杂高层建筑结构设计[M] . 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2005.
XU Peifu, FU Xuyi, WANG Cuikun, et al. Design of complex tall building structure [M]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2005.
[12] Mander J B, Priestley M J N. and Park R. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete, ASCE, Journal of Structural Engineering, 1988, 114 (8): 1804～1826.
[13] 缪志伟, 吴耀辉, 马千里, 等. 框架-核心筒高层混合结构的三维空间弹塑性抗震分析[J], 建筑结构学报, 2009, 30(4): 119-129.
MIU Zhiwei, WU Yaohui, MA Qianli,et al. Seismic performance evaluation using nonlinear time history analysis with three-dimensional structural model for a hybrid frame-core tube structure [J], Journal of Building Structures, 2009, 30(4): 119-129.
[14] 韩小雷, 陈学伟, 林生逸, 等. 基于纤维模型的超高层钢筋混凝土结构弹塑性时程分析[J]. 建筑结构, 2010 (2): 13-16.
HAN Xiaolei, CHEN Xuewei, LIN Yisheng, et al. Elasto-plastic time-history analysis of super high-rise RC structure based on fiber model [J]. Building Structure, 2010 (2): 13-16.
[15] GB50011-2010. 建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
GB 50011-2010. Code for seismic design of buildings [S]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2010.