高应力率下混凝土动态粘结性能试验技术与数据处理方法

周继凯,沈大伟,潘杨

振动与冲击 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (18) : 43-48.

PDF(2181 KB)
PDF(2181 KB)
振动与冲击 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (18) : 43-48.
论文

高应力率下混凝土动态粘结性能试验技术与数据处理方法

  • 周继凯,沈大伟,潘杨
作者信息 +

Test technique and data processing method for dynamic bond behavior between steel bar and concrete under high stress rates

  • ZHOU Jikai  SHEN Dawei  PAN Yan
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

本文在分离式霍普金森压杆装置基础上开发了一套钢筋与混凝土动态粘结性能试验加载装置。该装置由反力框、承力装置及固定支座等组成,该装置能够实现高应力率下钢筋与混凝土的粘结性能试验。并利用该装置对冲击气压为1.0MPa,混凝土强度分别为C30,C40和C50的3组共15个试件进行动态拔出试验。试验结果发现:粘结应力率越高,钢筋与混凝土之间的极限粘结强度越大,且达到极限粘结强度对应的滑移量越小;混凝土强度越大,极限粘结强度增大,但极限粘结强度对应的滑移量无明显变化。得出了合理的试件安装、荷载施加、数据采集和处理方法,最终形成了规范的动态粘结性能试验操作步骤,并得到了高应力率下粘结应力—滑移全过程曲线。

Abstract

Based on Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) device, together with a reaction frame, a force bearing device and fixed supports, a loading device for testing the dynamic bond behavior between steel bar and concrete, especially under high stress rates, was developed. The dynamic pull-out tests were carried out on 15 specimens of three concrete strengths (C30, C40 and C50) under the impact air pressure of 1.0 MPa. The experimental results show that the ultimate bond strength increases and the corresponding slip decreases with the increase of bond stress rates;  the ultimate bond strength increases with the increase of concrete strength but the corresponding slip has no obvious change. After conducting the tests, the suitable methods for test specimen installation, loading application and data acquisition and processing were concluded. The normative test procedure and dynamic bond stress-slip curves for the whole loading process were obtained.

关键词

SHPB装置 / 高应力率 / 粘结性能 / 动态试验技术

Key words

SHPB device / high stress rate / bond behavior / dynamic test technique

引用本文

导出引用
周继凯,沈大伟,潘杨. 高应力率下混凝土动态粘结性能试验技术与数据处理方法[J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(18): 43-48
ZHOU Jikai SHEN Dawei PAN Yan. Test technique and data processing method for dynamic bond behavior between steel bar and concrete under high stress rates[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(18): 43-48

参考文献

[1] Mains R M. Measurement of the distribution of tensile and bond stresses along reinforcing bars [J]. ACI Journal, 1951, 23(3): 225-252.
[2] Lutz L A, Gergely P. Mechanics of bond and slip of deformed bars in concrete [J]. ACI Journal, 1967, 64(11): 711-721.
[3] Li Hai-tao, Deeks A J, SU Xiao-zu et al. Tensile bond anchorage properties of Australian 500N steel bars in concrete [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(10):2718-2725.
[4] Goto Y. Cracks formed in concrete around deformed tension bars [J]. ACI Journal, 1971, 68(4):244-251.
[5] Tepfers R. Cracking of concrete cover along anchored deformed reinforcing bars [J]. Magazine of concrete Research, 1979, 31(106): 3-12.
[6] Kemp E L, Wilhelm W J. Investigation of the parameters influencing bond cracking [J]. ACI Journal, 1979, 76(1): 47-71.
[7] Darwin D, Zuo J, Tholen M L, et al. Development length criteria for conventional and high relative rib area reinforcing bars [J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1996, 93(3): 347-359.
[8] Esfahani M R, Rangan B V. Local bond strength of reinforcing bars in normal strength and high-strength concrete(HSC) [J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1988, 95(2): 96-106.
[9] Bouazaoui L, Li A. Analysis of steel/concrete interfacial shear stress by means of pull out test [J]. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, 2008, 28(3):101–108.
[10] Xie Ming, Zheng Shan-suo. Fractal analysis on bond-slip behavior between steel shape and concrete in SRC on axial pull-out test [J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 382:352-355.
[11] Baena M, Torres L, Turon A, et al. Experimental study of bond behavior between concrete and FRP bars using a pull-out test [J]. Composites Part B Engineering, 2009, 40(8):784-797.
[12] Xiao Jian-zhuang, Hou Yi-zhao, Huang Zhan-fei. Beam test on bond behavior between high-grade rebar and high-strength concrete after elevated temperatures [J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2014, 69:23-35.
[13] Xu Gang, Ai Tian-cheng, Wang Qing, et al. Beam test research on bond behavior between steel bar and concrete in salt-frost environment [J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 261-263(1):50-55.
[14] Li Da-zhao, Wei Ying-hui, Liu Chun-yue, et al. Effects of high strain rate on properties and microstructure evolution of TWIP steel subjected to impact loading [J]. Journal of Iron & Steel Research International, 2010, 17(6):67-73.
[15] Cotsovos D M, Pavlovic M N. Numerical investigation of concrete subjected to compressive impact loading. Part 2: Parametric investigation of factors affecting behavior at high loading rates [J]. Computers and Structures, 2008, 86:164–180.
[16] Chen Xu-dong, Chen Chen, Qian Ping-ping, et al. Influence of specimen size on compression behavior of cement paste and mortar under high strain rates [J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater. Sci. Ed., 2016, 31(2):300-306.
[17] Yao Wei, Wu Hai-jun, Huang Feng-lei. Experimental investigation about dynamic bond-slip between reinforcing steel bar and concrete [J]. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 2013, 249-250:1073-1081.
[18] Solomo G, Berra M, Testing of anchorages in concrete under dynamic tensile loading [J]. Materials and Structures, 2006, 39(7): 695-706.
[19] Solomo G, Berra M, Rebar pullout testing under dynamic Hopkinson bar induced impulsive loading [J]. Materials and Structures, 2010, 43(1): 247-260.
[20] Zhou Ji-kai, Ge Li-mei. Effect of strain rate and water-to-cement ratio on compressive mechanical behavior of cement mortar [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2015, 22(3):1087-1095.
[21] Hansen R J, Liepins A A. Behavior of bond under dynamic loading [J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1959.
[22] Cheng Yan. Bond between reinforcing bars and concrete under impact loading[D].The University of British Columbia,1992.
[23] Weathersby J H. Investigation of bond slip between concrete and steel reinforcement under dynamic loading conditions [D].Louisiana: Louisiana State University, 2003.
[24] Sameer H, Taher A L, Brian Z. Rate effect on pullout behavior of steel fibers embedded in very-high strength concrete [J]. American Journal of Engineering & Applied Sciences, 2010, 3(2):454-463.
[25] Alavi-fard M, Marzouk H. Bond of high-strength concrete under monotonic pull-out loading [J]. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2004, 56(9):545-557.
[26] Chen Xu-dong, Wu Sheng-xing, Zhou Ji-kai. Experimental Study on Dynamic Tensile Strength of Cement Mortar Using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Technique [J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2014, 26(6):150-153.
[27] Zhou Ji-kai, Chen Xu-dong. Stress−strain behavior and statistical continuous damage model of cement mortar under high strain rates [J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2013, 25(1): 120−130.
[28] Kim K, Lim Y M. Simulation of rate dependent fracture in concrete using an irregular lattice model [J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2011, 33(9): 949−955.
[29] Vos E, Reinhardt H W. Influence of loading rate on bond behavior of reinforcing steel and prestressing strands [J]. Materials & Structures, 1982, 15(1):3-10.
[30] 王礼立.应力波基础[M].北京,国防工业出版社,2005.
Wang Li-li. Foundation of Stress Waves [M].Beijing: National Defense Industry Press,2005.
[31] 普通混凝土力学性能试验方法标准(GB/T 50081-2002)[S]. 北京, 中国建筑工业出版社, 2002.
GB/T 50081-2002.Standard for test method of mechanical properties on ordinary concrete[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2002.

PDF(2181 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/