城市高架匝道桥部分隔震体系地震响应分析

PDF(2370 KB)

振动与冲击 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7) : 141-148.

论文

城市高架匝道桥部分隔震体系地震响应分析

张菊辉1; 梁磊1; 管仲国2

作者信息 +

Seismic response analysis of a viaduct ramp bridge with partial vibration isolation

ZHANG Juhui1,LIANG Lei1,GUAN Zhongguo2

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

针对城市高架匝道桥，提出仅在矮墩上设置隔震装置的部分隔震设计方案。以上海嘉闵高架某直线匝道桥为例，系统对比了“完全延性”、“完全隔震”与“部分隔震”体系下的结构地震响应。结果表明，相比“完全延性”设计，将固定墩改为活动墩的“部分隔震”设计，能有效降低纵向固定墩的地震强度和变形需求近70%，减小过渡墩伸缩缝的变形需求约21%~34%，降低主梁横向的地震动加速度约20%~39%；同时相比“完全隔震”设计，在墩底内力响应、支座变形以及伸缩缝变形方面基本相当。此外，固定墩改为活动墩的“部分隔震”设计，相较仍设固定墩的“部分隔震”设计，能显著降低纵向固定墩的地震响应以及主梁的纵向地震加速度近56%与38%，具有相对更优的性能。

Abstract

A partial vibration isolation system in which only short bridge columns are isolated was proposed for the a seismic design of ramp bridges.A parallel ramp bridge on the Jia-min Elevated Route in Shanghai was taken as a study object,and the structural seismic responses under three kinds of seismic resistant systems including a full ductility resistant system,a full vibration isolation system,and a partial vibration isolation system were analyzed.It was shown that compared with the full ductility resistant system,using the partial vibration isolation system in which the traditional fixed pier is changed into a movable pier,the earthquake intensity and deformation demand of the fixed pier along the longitudinal direction are effectively reduced by nearly 70%,the deformation demands of expansion joints at transition piers are reduced by almost 21%-34% ,and the acceleration of girders under the transverse earthquake input is also greatly reduced by 20%-39%; compared with the full vibration isolation system,simulation results for the 2nd design and the 3rd one are very close in aspects,such as,internal forces at pier bottom,bearing deformation and longitudinal displacements of expansion joints at transition piers; furthermore,two kinds of partial vibration isolation schemes with and without the arrangement of the fixed pier are compared,the latter has more superior performances,the latter can reduce the longitudinal seismic response of the fixed pier and the longitudinal acceleration of the main girders 56% and 38%,respectively.

导出引用

张菊辉1 梁磊1 管仲国2. 城市高架匝道桥部分隔震体系地震响应分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(7): 141-148

ZHANG Juhui1,LIANG Lei1,GUAN Zhongguo2. Seismic response analysis of a viaduct ramp bridge with partial vibration isolation[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(7): 141-148

参考文献

[1] JTG/TB02-01-2008 公路桥梁抗震设计细则[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2008.
[2] CJJ166-2011 城市桥梁抗震设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2011.
[3] Sugita H and Mahin S. Manual for Menshin Design of Highway Bridges: Ministry of Construction, Japan. UCB/EERC 94-10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 1994.
[4] Lee, GC, Kitane Y, and Buckle I G. Literature review of the observed performance of seismically isolated bridges [R]. Research Progress and Accomplishments: 2000-2001, MCEER, State University of New York, Buffalo. P. 51-61, 2001.
[5] Chaudhary MTA, Abe M, and Fujino Y. Performance evaluation of base-isolated Yama-age bridge with high damping rubber bearings using recorded seismic data [J]. Engineering Structures, 2001, 23: 902-910.
[6] Chang K C, Tsai M H, Hwang J S, Wei S S. Field testing of a seismically isolated concrete bridge. Structural Engineering & Mechanics, 2003, 16: 241-257.
[7] Tsai M H. Transverse earthquake response analysis of a seismically isolated regular bridge with partial restraint [J]. Engineering Structures, 2008, 30:393-403.
[8] Tubaldi E, Asta AD, Dezi L. Seismic response analysis of continuous multispan bridges with partial isolation [J]. Shock and Vibration, 2015, 2015: 1-15.
[9] Shen J, Tsai M H, Chang K C, and Lee, G C. Performance of a seismically isolated bridge under near-fault earthquake ground motions [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 2004, 130(6): 861-868.
[10] Boroschek R L, Moroni M O, and Sarrazin M. Dynamic characteristics of a long span seismic isolated bridge, Engineering Structures, 2003, 25 (12):1479-1490.
[11] Hu WY. Analysis of effectiveness of bridges with partial isolation [D]. M.S.thesis, 2008, Utah state university, Logan, Utah, USA.
[12] 张菊辉, 管仲国. 匝道桥地震响应影响要素分析[J]. 桥梁建设, 2015, 45(4): 58-63.
Zhang Ju-hui, Guan Zhong-guo. Analysis of factors influencing seismic response of ramp bridges [J]. Bridge construction, 2015, 45(4): 58-63. (in Chinese)
[13] 葛继平, 管仲国, 李建中. 群桩基础桥梁抗震分析简化模型[J]. 结构工程师, 2006, 22(6): 64-67.
GE Ji-ping, GUAN Zhong-guo, LI Jian-zhong. Simplified Model for seismic analysis of bridges with Group pile foundations [J]. Structural Engineers, 2006, 22(6): 64-67. (in Chinese)
[14] 陈亮, 任伟新, 张广峰等. 基于性能的桥梁抗震设计中考虑持时的实际地震波优化选择方法[J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(3): 35-42.
Chen Liang, Ren Wei-xin, Zhang Guang-feng etc. An optimal method for selecting real earthquake ground motions considering duration for performance-based aseismic design of bridges [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 34(3): 35-42. (in Chinese)
[15] 范立础, 卓卫东. 桥梁延性抗震设计[M]. 北京：人民交通出版社, 2001.
[16] 范立础, 王志强. 桥梁减隔震设计[M]. 北京：人民交通出版社, 2001.
[17] Najm H, Patel R, Nassif H. Evaluation of laminated circular elastomeric bearings [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2007, 12(1):89-97.
[18] Seismic Design Criteria, Version 1.1, Sacraments, California, California Department of Transportation (CAL-TRANS), Division of Structures, 1999.
[19] 张菊辉，管仲国. 规则连续梁桥地震易损性研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2014, 33(20): 140-145.
ZHANG Ju-hui, GUAN Zhong-guo. Seismic Vulnerability Analysis of Regular Continuous Girder Bridges[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(20): 140-145. (in Chinese)