考虑行波效应的沉管隧道抗震性能:振动台阵试验研究

张学明1,2,闫维明1,2,陈彦江1,2,陈适才1,2,陈红娟3

振动与冲击 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2) : 76-84.

PDF(1953 KB)
PDF(1953 KB)
振动与冲击 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2) : 76-84.
论文

考虑行波效应的沉管隧道抗震性能:振动台阵试验研究

  • 张学明1,2,闫维明1,2,陈彦江1,2,陈适才1,2,陈红娟3
作者信息 +

Shaking tables tests for an immersed tunnel model considering wave passage effect

  • ZHANG Xue-ming1, 2, YAN Wei-ming3, CHEN Yan-jiang1, 2, CHEN Shi-cai1,2, CHEN Hong-juan1, 2#br#
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为研究沉管隧道结构及接头的抗震性能,通过振动台阵试验研究了沉管隧道结构及其接头动力响应特征。试验分别考虑了一致及不同视波速的纵向行波激励,对比研究了行波效应对土和沉管隧道及其接头的影响规律和影响程度。试验结果表明:一致激励下,隧道与土体具有比较一致的整体运动,而考虑纵向行波效应时,土体和隧道产生相对滑移,同时纵向行波效应及其输入方向对接头轴力、弯矩和变形有较大影响,行波效应使得沉管隧道接头的反应趋于不均匀,沉管隧道及其接头进行抗震设计时应考虑行波激励的影响。

Abstract

Shaking table tests were conducted to investigate the aseismic behavior and dynamic response features of an immersed tunnel model and its joints. In order to contrastively study influences of wave passage effect on soil, immersed tunnel and its joints, the uniform longitudinal seismic excitation and the longitudinal seismic excitation with wave passage effect at different apparent wave velocities were considered in tests. The results showed that under the uniform longitudinal seismic excitation, the tunnel and soil body keep a synchronous motion; when the wave passage effect is considered, the tunnel and soil body have a relative sliding; the longitudinal wave passage effect and its input direction have a larger influence on axial force, bending moment and deformation of joints; the wave passage effect makes joints’ responses tend to non-uniform distribution, so the wave passage effect should be considered in aseismic design of an immersed tunnel and its joints.
 
 

关键词

沉管隧道 / 行波效应 / 振动台试验 / 土-结构相互作用 / 抗震性能

Key words

 immersed tunnel / wave passage effect / shaking tables test / soil-structure interaction / aseismic performance

引用本文

导出引用
张学明1,2,闫维明1,2,陈彦江1,2,陈适才1,2,陈红娟3. 考虑行波效应的沉管隧道抗震性能:振动台阵试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2018, 37(2): 76-84
ZHANG Xue-ming1, 2, YAN Wei-ming3, CHEN Yan-jiang1, 2, CHEN Shi-cai1,2, CHEN Hong-juan1, 2. Shaking tables tests for an immersed tunnel model considering wave passage effect[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2018, 37(2): 76-84

参考文献

[1] 傅继阳, 徐  安. 某沉管隧道场地土地震响应研究[J]. 广州大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 8(5): 64-67.
FU Ji-yang, XU An. Seismic response of site soil in an immersed tunnel[J]. Journal of Guangzhou University (Natural Science Edition), 2009, 8(5): 64-67.
[2] 刘鹏, 丁文其, 金跃朗, 等. 沉管隧道接头三维非线性刚度力学模型[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版). 2014, 42(2): 232-237.
LIU Peng, DING Wenqi, JIN Yuelang, et al. Three-dimension Nonlinear Stiffness Mechanical Model of Immersed Tunnel Joints[J]. Journal of Tongji University. 2014, 42(2): 232-237.
[3] 张如林, 楼梦麟, 袁勇. 土-海底沉管隧道体系三维地震响应分析[J]. 湖南大学学报 (自然科学版). 2014, 41 (4): 25-32.
ZHANG Ru-lin, LOU Meng-lin, YUAN Yong. Three-dimensional Seismic Respone Analysis of Soil -undersea Immersed Tunnel System[J]. Journal of Hunan University(Natural Sciences). 2014,41(4): 25-32.
[4] Anastasopoulos, Nikos Gerolymos, et al. Nonlinear Response of Deep Immersed Tunnel to Strong Seismic Shaking[J]. Geotech.Geoenviron. Eng. 2007, 133:1067-1090.
[5] R.S. van Oorsouw. Behaviour of segment joints in immersed tunnels under seismic loading[D]. Delft: Delft University of Technology, 2010.
[6] Jakob Hausgaard Lyngs. Model accuracy in aseismic design of immersed tunnel[D]. Greece: Aalborg University. 2008.
[7] 傅继阳, 吴玖荣, 徐安. 广州洲头咀沉管隧道地震响应研究[J]. 湖南大学学报 (自然科学版). 2008, 35(9): 23-27.
FU Ji-yang, WU Jiu-rong, Xu An. Seismic Response of Zhoutouzui Immersed Tunnel in Guangzhou[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences). 2008, 35(9): 23-27.
[8] 刘鸿哲, 黄茂松. 超长沉管隧道纵向地震响应频域分析方法[J]. 岩土工程学报. 2015. 37(11): 1971-1978.
Liu Hong-zhe, Huang Mao-song. Frequency-domain analysis method for longitudinal seismic response of super-long immersed tunnels[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering.
[9] 季倩倩. 地铁车站结构振动台模型试验研究[D]. 上海:同济大学,2002.
Ji Qianqian. Shaking table Model Test on the Metro Station structures[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2002.
[10] Jun Chen, Xiaojun Shi, Jie Li. Shaking table test of utility tunnel under non-uniform earthquake wave excitation[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2010, 30(2010): 1400-1416.
[11] 陈红娟, 闫维明, 陈适才, 张学明. 小比例尺地下结构振动台试验模型土的设计与试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2015, 23(3): 59-66.
CHEN Hong-Juan, YAN W M, CHEN S C, ZHANG X M. Design and experimental research on model soil used for shaking table test of a small scale underground structure [J]. Earthquake engineering and engineering dynamics, 2015, 23(3): 59 -66.
[12] 袁勇, 黄伟东, 禹海涛. 地下结构振动台试验模型箱应用现状[J]. 结构工程师, 2014, 30(1): 38-45.
YUAN Yong, HUANG Weidong, YU Haitao. Status of Model Container Applications in Shaking Table Test for underground Structures[J]. Structural Engineers, 2014, 30(1): 38-45.
[13] 钱德玲, 夏京等. 支盘桩一土一高层建筑结构振动台试验的研究. 岩石力学与工程学报[J]. 2009, 28(10): 2024-2030.
QIAN Deling, XIA Jing, et al. Study of Shaking table test of squeezed branch pile-soil-high-rise structure interaction system. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering[J]. 2009, 28(10): 2024-2030.
[14] 陈国兴, 王志华, 左熹, 等 . 振动台试验叠层剪切型土箱的研制[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32 (01): 89-97.
CHEN Guo-xing, WANG Zhi-hua, ZUO Xi, et al. Development of laminar shear soil container for shaking table tests. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering[J]. 2010, 32 (01): 89-97.
[15] 张学明, 陈彦江, 闫维明, 等. 沉管隧道振动台台阵试验模型土箱及适用性分析. 第二十三届全国结构工程学术会议论文集第Ⅱ册[C]. 北京:《工程力学》杂志社.2014. Ⅱ-405-Ⅱ410.
ZHANG Xueming, CHEN Yanjiang, YAN Weiming, et al. Study on applicability of soil container for immersed tunnel shaking table test. Proceedings of the twenty-third national conference on structural engineering NO. Ⅱ[C]. Engineering Mechanics Press. 2014. Ⅱ-405-Ⅱ410.

PDF(1953 KB)

331

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/