地铁隔振措施对钢轨声功率特性影响测试分析

PDF(1615 KB)

振动与冲击 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (8) : 206-212.

论文

盛曦，赵才友，王平，柯文华，李成辉

作者信息 +

Measurements and analysis of effects on rail sound power characteristics from metro vibrationreduction measures

SHENG Xi, ZHAO Caiyou, WANG Ping, KE Wenhua, LI Chenghui

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

当列车通过浮置板轨道和减振型扣件轨道等减振区段时，车内噪声较大，影响乘客的舒适性。滚动噪声是车内噪声的重要组成部分，而钢轨声功率反映了钢轨滚动噪声能量的大小。为了研究地铁隔振措施对钢轨声功率特性的影响，对不同隔振措施下钢轨垂向振动沿纵向的轨道衰减率和钢轨加速度导纳进行了测试，计算分析了单位简谐点激励下的钢轨垂向振动相对声功率级。结果表明所测隔振措施通过降低轨道垂向刚度，改变了钢轨垂向振动的加速度导纳幅值和轨道衰减率。钢弹簧浮置板道床和减振垫浮置板道床提高了三分之一倍频程中心频率200Hz以下的轨道衰减率，而GJ-III型减振扣件长枕整体道床的衰减率在中心频率2500Hz以下小于非减振型扣件长枕整体道床。钢轨在受到单位简谐点激励作用时，浮置板道床的钢轨声功率在200Hz以下明显增大，而GJ-III型减振扣件长枕整体道床的钢轨声功率在500Hz以下明显增大。

Abstract

When a train is crossing over the floating slab track or the track with vibration isolation fasteners, the vehicle interior noise is so high that it decreases the comfort of passengers. The rolling noise is the main part of the vehicle interior noise, and rail sound power reflects energy size of the rail rolling noise. In order to study the effects of vibration reduction measures on the rail sound power characteristics, the vertical track decay rates and rail acceleration mobility were tested, and relative rail sound power levels under the unit harmonic point excitation were calculated. The results show that vibrationisolation measures change the decay rate and rail acceleration mobility amplitude by decreasing the vertical track stiffness. The track decay rates of the steelspring floating slab bed and the isolationpad floating slab bed have been increased under 200 Hz, and the monolithic bed track with sleepers embedded and GJ-III vibrationisolation fasteners has the lower decay rate than that with DZIII1 fasteners under 2 500 Hz. The rail sound power of the floating slab track increases greatly under 200 Hz while that of the monolithic bed track with GJ-III vibrationisolation fasteners increases greatly under 500 H, when the rail is loaded by the unit harmonic point excitation.

导出引用

盛曦，赵才友，王平，柯文华，李成辉. 地铁隔振措施对钢轨声功率特性影响测试分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2018, 37(8): 206-212

SHENG Xi, ZHAO Caiyou, WANG Ping, KE Wenhua, LI Chenghui. Measurements and analysis of effects on rail sound power characteristics from metro vibrationreduction measures[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2018, 37(8): 206-212

参考文献

[1] 刘鹏辉，杨宜谦，尹京.地铁隧道内不同轨道结构振动测试与分析[J].振动与冲击，2014,33(2)：31-36.
LIU Peng-hui, YANG Yi-qian,YIN Jing. Test and analysis on vibration of different track structures in tunnel[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014,33(2): 31-36.
[2] 吴宗臻，刘维宁，马龙祥，等. 地铁浮置式轨道引起地表振动响应解析预测模型研究[J]. 振动与冲击，2014，33(17)：132-137.
WU Zong-zhen, LIU Wei-ning, MA Long-xiang, at al. Analytical prediction of ground vibration response induced by metro floationg-type track[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(17): 132-137.
[3] 田建辉，李兵，简炼.不同道床对地铁车内噪声影响特性分析[J]. 噪声与振动控制, 2015，35(6): 105-109.
TIAN Jian-hui, LI Bing, JIAN Lian. Analysis of metro interior noise characteristics for different track beds[J]. Noise and Vibration Control, 2015, 35(6): 105-109.
[4] 肖安鑫，田野.钢弹簧浮置板轨道对车内噪声影响的实测和分析[J]. 噪声与振动控制，2012，32(1): 51-54.
XIAO An-xin, TIAN Ye. Measurement and analysis of influence of steel spring floating slab track on vehicle interior noise[J]. Noise and Vibration Control, 2012，32(1): 51-54.
[5] 任海，肖友刚.地铁车内噪声的成因及控制策略[J]. 铁道车辆，2009，47(4): 25-28.
REN Hai, XIAO You-gang. The cause and control strategy of vehicle interior noise[J]. Rolling Stock, 2009, 47(4): 25-28.
[6] D. Thompson. Railway Noise and Vibration: Mechanisms, Modeling and Means of Control[M]. Oxford:Elsevier,2009: 20-24, 51-58, 76-81, 195-196.
[7] C.J.C. Jones, D.J. Thompson, R.J. Diehl. The use of decay rates to analyse the performance of railway track in rolling noise generation[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2006, 293(3-5): 485-495.
[8] CEN. BS EN 15461: 2008+A1: 2010 Railway Applications-Noise Emission-Characterization of the Dynamic Properties of Track Selections for Pass by Noise Measurements[S]. Brussels: CEN Management Centre, 2010.
[9] J. Ryue, D.J Thompson, P.R. White, at al. Decay rates of propagating waves in railway tracks at high frequencies[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2009, 320(4): 955-976.
[10] J. Maes, H. Sol. A double tuned rail damper-increased damping at the twofirst pinned-pinned frequencies[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2003, 267(3): 721-737.
[11] 孙晓静，张厚贵，刘维宁，等. 轨道系统钢轨振动衰减率动力测试研究[J]. 铁道工程学报，2015，32(7): 34-39.
SUN Xiao-jing, ZHANG Hou-gui, LIU Wei-ning, at al. Test research on the characterizing the dynamic damping behavior of track structure[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2015，32(7): 34-39.
[12] 徐宁,王志强,张攀,等. 谐振式浮轨扣件减振性能测试研究[J]. 材料开发与应用，2014，29(6): 22-26.
XU Ning, WANG Zhi-qiang, ZHANG Pan, at, al. Study on damping performance of tuned damper floating rail fastener[J]. Development and Application of Materials, 2014，29(6): 22-26.
[13] 李增光，吴天行. 浮置板轨道二维建模及隔振性能分析[J]. 铁道学报，2011，33(8): 93-98.
LI Zeng-guang, WuTian-xing. 2-D Modeling of floating slab rrack and performance analysis on vibration isolation[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2011，33(8): 93-98.
[14] 王志强，王安斌，白健，等. 成都地铁轨道GJ-III型减振扣件振动控制效果分析[J]. 噪声与振动控制，2014，34(3): 190-194.
WANG Zhi-qiang, WANG An-bin, BAI Jian, at al. Experimental study on track vibration control using GJ-III rail fastening system in Chengdu Metro[J]. Noise and Vibration Control, 2014, 34(3): 190-194.
[15] D.J. Thompson, N. Vincent. Track dynamic behavior at high frequencies. Part 1: Throretical models and laboratory measurement[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 1995,24(sup1):86-99.
[16] A.P.D. Man. A survey of dynamic railway track properties and theirquality[D]. Delft: TU Delft,2002:21-50.
[17] D.J. Mead. Wave propagation and natural modes in periodic systems: I. Mono-coupled systems[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1975, 40(1): 1-18.
[18] 万淑敏，吴天行. 铁路钢轨垂向振动的声辐射分析[J]. 噪声与振动控制，2009，(03)：86-89.
Wan Shuming, Wu Tianxing. AnalysisofRailAcousticRadiationduetoVerticalVibration[J]. Noise and Vibration Control, 2009，(03)：86-89.