良态风场与台风风场下输电塔线体系气弹模型风洞试验

PDF(1275 KB)

振动与冲击 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (8) : 257-262.

论文

邓洪洲，段成荫，徐海江

作者信息 +

Wind tunnel tests on an aeroelastic model of a transmission towerline system under normal wind field and typhoon wind field

DENG Hongzhou, DUAN Chengyin, XU Haijiang

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

基于文献资料确定了工程所在地区的良态风场和台风风场参数。采用离散刚度法制作了五塔四线输电塔线体系气弹模型，开展了紊流场中多种风速、多个风向角下单塔及塔线体系气弹模型风洞试验。比较了良态风场和台风风场下单塔及塔线体系的风振响应和风振系数。研究结果表明：台风风场下单塔及塔线体系的位移均值和加速度根方差均大于良态风场，试验风速为7m/s时位移差值分别为20%（单塔）和30%（塔线体系）左右，加速度根方差的差值分别为50%（单塔）和100%（塔线体系）左右；台风风场下输电塔的风振系数比良态风场下大7%以上。因此台风区输电线路设计要注意台风风场的高湍流特性对风振响应和风荷载的放大作用。

Abstract

Wind field parameters of normal wind field and typhoon wind field were determined in accordance with references. An aeroelastic model of a towerline system consisted of five towers and four lines was designed with the discrete stiffness method. Then wind tunnel tests at various wind speeds and incident angles were conducted and windinduced response and wind vibration coefficient of the transmission tower and towerline system were compared. Test results show that mean displacement and RMS acceleration under typhoon wind field are larger than those under normal wind filed. When test wind speed is about 7 m/s，the differences of mean displacement are approximately 20% for transmission tower and 30% for the towerline system, while the differences of RMS acceleration are respectively 50% and 100%. Wind vibration coefficient under typhoon wind field is more than 7% larger than that under normal wind field. Thus the influence of high turbulence characteristics of typhoon wind field on the magnification of windinduced response and wind load should be noticed in designing transmission towerline systems in typhoon regions.

导出引用

邓洪洲，段成荫，徐海江. 良态风场与台风风场下输电塔线体系气弹模型风洞试验[J]. 振动与冲击, 2018, 37(8): 257-262

DENG Hongzhou, DUAN Chengyin, XU Haijiang. Wind tunnel tests on an aeroelastic model of a transmission towerline system under normal wind field and typhoon wind field[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2018, 37(8): 257-262

参考文献

[1] 张锋，吴秋晗，李继红. 台风“云娜”对浙江电网造成的危害与防范措施[J]. 中国电力，2005，05:39-42.
ZHANG Feng, WU Qiu-han, LI Ji-hong. The harm of Typhoon Rananim on Zhejiang power grid and preventive measures[J]. Electric Power, 2005, 38(05):39-42.
[2] GB50009-2012. 建筑结构荷载规范[S]. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.
GB50009-2012. Load code for the design of building structures[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2012.
[3] DL/T 5154-2012. 架空输电线路杆塔结构设计技术规定[S].北京：中国计划出版社, 2012.
DL/T5154-2012. Technical code of design of tower and pole structures of overhead transmission line [S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2012.
[4] GB50545-2010. 110kV-750kV架空输电线路设计规范[S]. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
GB50545-2010. Code for design of 110～750kV overhead transmission line [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2010.
[5] 王旭, 黄鹏, 顾明, 等. 台风 “米雷” 近地层脉动风特性实测研究[J]. 土木工程学报，2013，46(7): 28-36.
WANG Xu, HUANG Peng, GU Ming, et al. Field measurement of turbulence characteristics near ground during typhoon ‘Meari’ [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2013, 46(7): 28-36.
[6] Melbourne W H, Blackman D R. Wind turbulence overseas in tropical cyclones [J]. Coastal Engineering Proceedings, 1982, 1(18).
[7] Li L, Kareem A, Xiao Y, et al. Wind Profile and Spectra in Typhoon-Prone Regions in South China [C] //Proceedings of the Advances in Hurricane Engineering Conference. Miami, Florida, America. 2012: 929-940.
[8] Xu Y L, Zhan S. Field measurements of Di Wang tower during typhoon York [J]. Journal of wind engineering & industrial aerodynamics, 2001, 89(1): 73-93.
[9] 赵林, 葛耀君, 宋丽莉, 等. 广州地区台风极值风特性蒙特卡洛随机模拟[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版)，2007，35(8): 1034-1038.
ZHAO Lin, GE Yao-jun, SONG Li-li, et al. Monte-Carlo simulation analysis of typhoon extreme value wind characteristics in Guangzhou [J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2007, 35(8): 1034-1038.
[10] 楼文娟, 夏亮, 姜莹, 等. B 类风场与台风风场下输电塔的风振响应和风振系数[J]. 振动与冲击, 2013, 32(6): 13-17.
LOU Wen-juan, XIA Liang, JIANG Ying, et al. Wind-induced response and wind load factor of transmission tower under terrain B wind field and typhoon wind field [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2013, 32(6): 13-17.
[11] 楼文娟, 蒋莹, 金晓华, 等. 台风风场下角钢塔风振特性风洞试验研究[J]. 振动工程学报，2013，26(2): 207-213.
LOU Wen-juan, JIANG Ying, JIN Xiao-hua et al. Wind tunnel test research on wind-induced vibration characteristics of angle steel tower in typhoon field [J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2013, 26(2): 207-213.
[12] 邓洪洲, 司瑞娟, 段成荫, 等. 输电塔气动力系数和气动导纳风洞试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(3): 188-195.
DENG Hong-zhou, SI Rui-juan, DUAN Cheng-yin, et al. Wind tunnel test for aerodynamic coefficient and aerodynamic admittance of a transmission tower [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 34(3): 188-195.
[13] Loredo-Souza A M, Davenport A G. A novel approach for wind tunnel modeling of transmission lines [J]. Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics, 2001, 89(11): 1017-1029.
[14] 邓洪洲，司瑞娟，胡晓依，等. 特高压输电塔气弹模型风洞试验研究[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版)，2010， 05:673-678.
DENG Hong-zhou, SI Rui-juan, HU Xiao-yi, et al. Wind tunnel Test on aeroelastic model of UHV latticed transmission tower [J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2010, 05:673-678.
[15] ENV1993-1-1:2004, 2005. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures –Part 1.1. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
[16] Sharma R N, Rechards P J. A re-examination of the characteristics of tropical cyclone winds [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 1999, 83: 21-33.
[17] Cole, H A J. Methods and apparatus for measuring the damping characteristics of a structure [P]. United States, 3620069, 1971-11-16.
[18] Juang J N, Pappa R S. An Eigensystem Realization Algorithm(ERA) for modal parameter identification and modal reduction [J]. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 1985, 8(5): 620-627.