隔震体系对摇摆自复位高墩工作性能的影响

张育智

振动与冲击 ›› 2019, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (11) : 54-58.

PDF(637 KB)
PDF(637 KB)
振动与冲击 ›› 2019, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (11) : 54-58.
论文

隔震体系对摇摆自复位高墩工作性能的影响

  • 张育智
作者信息 +

Effects of seismic isolation system on working performance of rocking self-resetting high piers

  • ZHANG Yuzhi
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为提高摇摆自复位高墩的隔震性能,将铅芯橡胶支座及液体粘滞阻尼器与摇摆自复位高墩进行组合形成了2种不同的隔震体系。以2种不同强度下的3条地震动作为输入,采用OpenSEES利用动力时程分析方法对各隔震体系的地震动响应进行了分析。通过对墩身最大剪力、墩身最大弯矩、墩顶最大位移和主梁最大位移的隔震指标及最大墩梁相对位移绝对值的对比发现:墩梁固结条件下在桥台与主梁间设置液体粘滞阻尼器的体系2和墩、梁间设置铅芯橡胶支座且在桥台与主梁间设置液体粘滞阻尼器的体系3分别适合作为软土场地和硬土场地上修建的摇摆自复位高墩的隔震体系。

Abstract

In order to improve the seismic isolation performance of rocking self-resetting high piers, lead-rubber bearing and fluid viscous damper were combined with rocking self-resetting high pier, respectively to form two seismic isolation systems. 3 ground motions with two different intensities were taken as inputs, and the time history analysis method and the software OpenSEES were adopted to analyze seismic responses of the two seismic isolation systems. Through comparing seismic isolation indexes of pier’s maximum shear force, pier’s maximum bending moment, pier top’s maximum displacement and girder’s maximum displacement, and the maximum absolute value of the relative displacement between pier and girder in all seismic responses, it was shown that the isolation system 2 with fluid viscous damper located between abutment and girder under the condition of pier and girder being fixed is suitable for being built on soft soil sites, while the isolation system 3 with lead-rubber bearing located between pier and girder and fluid viscous damper located between abutment and girder is suitable for being built on hard soil sites.

关键词

摇摆自复位桥墩 / 铅芯橡胶支座 / 液体粘滞阻尼器 / 隔震体系 / 时程分析法

Key words

rocking self-centering high pier / lead rubber bearing / fluid viscous damper / seismic isolation system / time history analysis

引用本文

导出引用
张育智. 隔震体系对摇摆自复位高墩工作性能的影响[J]. 振动与冲击, 2019, 38(11): 54-58
ZHANG Yuzhi . Effects of seismic isolation system on working performance of rocking self-resetting high piers[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2019, 38(11): 54-58

参考文献

[1] Mander J B, Cheng C T. Seismic resistance of bridge piers based on damage avoidance design[R]. Buffalo U.S.A.: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, 1997: 3-5.
[2] Cheng C, Chen F. Seismic performance of a rocking bridge pier substructure with frictional hinge dampers[J]. Smart Structures and Systems. 2014, 14(4): 501-516.
[3] 鲁亮,江乐,李鸿,等. 柱端铰型受控摇摆式钢筋混凝土框架抗震性能的振动台试验研究[J].振动与冲击,2016, 35(04): 193-198+216.
LU Liang, Jiang Le, Li Hong, et al. Shaking table tests for aseismic performance of a controllable rocking reinforced concrete frame with column-end-hinge joints[J]. Journal of vibration and shock,2016, 35(04): 193-198+216.
[4] 鲁亮,刘霞. 一种体外预应力钢筋混凝土摇摆框架抗震性能研究[J]. 振动与冲击,2017,36(09):179-185+252.
Lu Liang, Liu Xia. Aseismic performance of an external prestressed rocking reinforced concrete frame[J]. Journal of vibration and shock, 2017,36(09):179-185+252.
[5] Housner G W. The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1963, 53(2):403-417.
[6] Priestley M J N, Evison R J, Carr A J. Seismic response of structures free to rock on their foundations[J]. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 1978, 11(3): 141-150.
[7] Makris N, Konstantinidis D. The rocking spectrum and limitations of practical design methodologies[J]. Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics, 2003, 32: 265-289.
[8] Cormack L G. Design and construction of the major bridges on the Mangaweka Rail Deviation[J]. Transactions of the Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand, Civil Engineering Section, 1988, 15(1): 16-23.
[9] Ma Q T, Khan M H. Free vibration tests of a scale model of the South Rangitikei Railway Bridge[C]. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Conference, Wairakei, New Zealand, 2008, 1-9.
[10] 夏修身, 陈兴冲. 铁路铁路高墩桥梁基底摇摆隔震与墩顶减震对比研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2011, 33(9): 102-107.
XIA Xiu-shen, CHEN Xing-chong. Controlled rocking and pier top seismic isolation of railway bridge with tall piers[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2011, 33(9): 102-107.
[11] 夏修身,陈兴冲,李建中. 高墩自复位隔震机理[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2015(07): 2549-2557.
Xia Xiu-shen, Chen Xing-chong, Li Jian-zhong. Isolation mechanism of self-centering tall pier[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and technology). 2015(07): 2549-2557.
[12] Wiebe L, Christopoulos C. Mitigation of higher mode effects in base-rocking systems by using multiple rocking sections[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 2009, 13: 83-108.
[13] 夏修身. 铁路高墩抗震设计方法研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2012: 40-40.
XIA Xiu-shen. Research on seismic design of tall piers for railway bridges[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2012:40-40.
[14] Baffo D. Seismic rocking isolation effect on superficial foundations of bridges[D]. Pavia Italia: Università degli Studi di Pavia, 2007: 120-124.
[15] Panagiotis M. Rocking isolation of bridge piers resting on spread foundations[D]. Pavia Italia: Università degli Studi di Pavia, 2004: 3-3.

PDF(637 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/