结合大涡模拟和声比拟方法,对膨胀腔消声单元内部的流场及气流再生噪声进行了分析。建立流场数值仿真模型,采用大涡模拟方法对膨胀腔内部非稳态流动进行计算。建立声场仿真模型,通过提取流场信息计算气流再生噪声的声源分布。结合声比拟方法,将气流噪声源导入声场网格中计算远场响应点的气流噪声声压值,仿真结果与实验结果在声压级及共振频率上都吻合良好。根据腔内气流再生噪声产生的机理,选用穿孔管对气流再生噪声进行抑制。搭建气流再生噪声实验台,并加工实验样件,对不同气流速度下的穿孔管膨胀腔的噪声抑制效果进行分析验证。研究结果表明:穿孔管膨胀腔通过阻断强剪切层的形成可以有效抑制腔内低频气流再生噪声,并且随着气流速度的增加,抑制效果向中高频范围扩展;穿孔管膨胀腔对气流再生噪声声压级的抑制效果随着气流速度的增加而增强。
Abstract
Combined with the large eddy simulation and acoustic analogy method, the flow field and airflow regeneration noise inside the expansion chamber of muffler were analyzed.The numerical simulation model for the flow field of expansion chamber was set up.The unsteady flow in the expansion cavity was calculated with the large eddy simulation method.A sound field simulation model was established, and the sound source distribution of the airflow regeneration noise was calculated with the information extracted from the flow field simulation results.Through the acoustic analogy method, the airflow regeneration noise source was introduced into the sound field grid to calculate the sound pressure at the far field response point.The simulation results are in good agreement with the experimental results on the sound pressure level and the resonance frequency.According to the generation mechanism of the airflow regeneration noise in the cavity, perforated tube was used to suppress the airflow noise.The experimental setup of airflow regeneration noise was built, and the experimental samples were processed.The noise suppression effect of perforated tube in the expansion chamber with different airflow velocity was analyzed and verified.The results show that the perforated tube in the expansion chamber can effectively suppress the low frequency airflow regeneration noise in the cavity by blocking the formation of the strong shear layer, and with the increase of flow velocity, the noise suppression effect extends to the middle and high frequency range.The suppression effect of the perforated tube in the expansion chamber on the sound pressure level of the airflow regeneration noise improves with the increase of airflow velocity.
关键词
消声器 /
膨胀腔 /
气流再生噪声 /
大涡模拟 /
声比拟 /
穿孔结构
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
muffler /
expansion chamber /
airflow regeneration noise /
large eddy simulation /
acoustic analogy;perforated structure.
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] MUNJAL M L. Acoustic of ducts and mufflers 2th edi-tion[M]. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley, 2014.
[2] CHANG Y-c, LIN D-y, CHENG H-c, et al. Numerical assessment of rectangular Straight/Reverse mufflers at High-Order-Modes[J]. Journal of Mechanics, 2018, 34(3): 325-336.
[3] FANG Z, LIU C-y. Acoustic attenuation analysis of oval expansion chambers with extended single inlet and double outlets[J]. Noise Control Engineering Journal, 2017, 65(2): 83-93.
[4] FANG Z, LIU C-y. Combined mesh free method and mode matching approach for transmission loss predictions of ex-pansion chamber silencers[J]. Engineering Analysis With Boundary Elements, 2017, 84(1): 168-177.
[5] XIANG L-y, ZUO S-g, WU X-d, et al. Acoustic behaviour analysis and optimal design of a multi-chamber reactive muffler[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D-JOURNAL of Automobile Engineering, 2016, 230(13): 1862-1870.
[6] FANG Z, JI Z-l, LIU C-y. Acoustic attenuation analysis of silencers with multi-chamber by using coupling method based on subdomain division technique[J]. Applied Acous-tics, 2017, 116(1): 152-163.
[7] LEE S, BOLTON J S, MARTINSON P A. Design of multi-chamber cylindrical silencers with microperforated ele-ments[J]. Noise Control Engineering Journal, 2016, 64(4): 532-543.
[8] 康钟绪,郑四发,连小珉,等.膨胀腔消声器声学仿真的一维修正方法[J].声学学报,2011,36(06):652-657.
KANG Zhongxu, ZHENG Sifa, LIAN Xiaomin, et al. Corrected one-dimensional approach for the acoustic simu-lation of expansion chamber silencer[J]. Acta Acustica, 2011, 36(06): 652-657.
[9] 方智,季振林.插管结构对膨胀腔消声器声学性能的影响[J].声学学报,2014,39(06):738-744.
FANG Zhi, JI Zhenlin. Effects of extended ducts on acous-tic attenuation performance of expansion chamber muf-flers[J]. Acta Acustica, 2014, 39 (06) : 738-744.
[10]方智,季振林.进出口位置对不同形状膨胀腔消声特性的影响[J].噪声与振动控制,2011,31(04):160-164.
FANG Zhi, JI Zhenlin. Effect of inlet and outlet locations on acoustic attenuation characteristics of elliptical and oval expansion chambers[J]. Noise and Vibation Control, 2011, 31(04): 160-164.
[11] DAVIES P, HOLLAND K R. The Observed aeroacoustic behaviour of some flow-excited expansion chambers[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2001, 4(239): 695-708.
[12] ENGLISH J E, HOLLAND R K. Aeroacoustic sound gen-eration in simple expansion chambers[J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2010, 5(128): 2589-2595.
[13] TAKASHI Esaki. Noise source characteristics in muffler tail pipes with pulsating flow[C]// 5th International conference on independent component analysis and blind signal separation. Granada, Spain: ICA 2004-II. 2004: 1049-1052.
[14] ROECK W D, DESMET W. Experimental acoustic identi-fication of flow noise sources in expansion chambers[C]// Proceedings of ISMA 2008. Belgium: KU Leuven. 2008: 455-470.
[15] DESANTES J M, TORREGROSA A J, BROATCH A. Experiments on flow noise generation in simple exhaust geometries[J]. Actra Acustica, 2001, 87(87): 46-55.
[16] Rubio G, ROECK W D, Desmet W, et al. Large eddy simu-lation for computation of aeroacoustic sources in 2D ex-pansion chambers[C]// Direct and Large-Eddy Simulation VI. Netherlands: Springer Nature. 2006: 555-564.
[17] 吴大转,陈一伟,苗天丞,等.抗式消声器二次噪声的研究[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2014,48(09):1661-1667.
WU Dazhuan, CHEN Yiwei, MIAO Tiancheng,et al. Study on regeneration noise of reactive muffler[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Engineering Science), 2014, 48(09):1661-1667.
[18] 高小新,匡芳,褚志刚.简单抗性消声器气流再生噪声研究[J].汽车工程学报,2016,6(06):437-441.
GAO Xiaoxin, KUANG Fang, CHU Zhigang. Study on re-generation noise of simple reactive muffler[J]. Chinese Journal of Automotive Engineering, 2016, 6(06):437-441.
[19] CLAUS W, THOMAS H, PIERRE S. Large-eddy Simula-tion for Acoustics[M]. USA: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[20] GOLDSTEIN M E. A generalized acoustic analogy[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2003, 488(1): 315-333.
[21] NANA C, MARX D, PRAX C, et al. Hybrid aeroacoustic computation of a low Mach number non-isothermal shear layer[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2014,93(8):30-40.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}