钢管混凝土柱排架&mdash;核心筒结构抗震性能研究

PDF(3388 KB)

振动与冲击 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12) : 190-197.

论文

钢管混凝土柱排架—核心筒结构抗震性能研究

曾繁良1，黄炎生1，周靖2

作者信息 +

A study on the seismic performance of concrete-filled steel tube column-steel shelf-concrete core tube structures

ZENG Fanliang1,HUANG Yansheng1,ZHOU Jing2

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

以钢管混凝土柱钢框架—核心筒结构为工程背景，将钢梁与柱、核心筒的节点修改为螺栓连接的铰接节点，制作1/40的缩尺结构模型进行振动台测试，研究结构的损伤特点、动力特性、最大侧向位移、层间位移角、扭转角、地震惯性力、楼层剪力和延性需求等。结果表明：震损出现在下部楼层的混凝土楼板与柱连接、楼板与核心筒连接、楼板与钢梁连接、核心筒角部等部位；基本自振周期和阻尼比随震损增加而增大，动力放大效应减小，长周期地震动反应较显著；核心筒最大层间位移角达1/26，超过规范框架—核心筒结构体系不倒塌限值3.8倍未出现倒塌；钢排架抗扭刚度小，结构扭转反应由核心筒主导；地震惯性力和楼层剪力受地震长周期分量的影响小，楼层延性需求差异大。

Abstract

Taking an actual concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) column-steel frame-reinforced concrete (RC) core-tube hybrid structure as a reference engineering, a CFST column-steel shelf-core tube prototype structure was designed by changing the rigid joint of the steel frame beam to the column or core walls to the bolted joint. A 1/40 scaled model structure was constructed and performed the shaking table tests. The damage phenomena, dynamic characteristics, maximum lateral displacement, maximum inter-story drift angle, maximum torsion angle, seismic inertial force, story shear force, overturning moment and ductility demand of the structure were studied. The experimental results shows that the damage occur at the connection between the concrete slab and the column on the lower story, the connection between the concrete slab and the core wall, the connection between the concrete slab and the steel beam, and the corner concrete of the core tube walls. The basic natural vibration periods and damping ratios increase with the increase of the seismic damage, and the dynamic amplification effect decrease. The long-period ground motion response is more significant. The maximum inter-story drift angle of the core tube is 1/26, which exceeds 3.8 times of the collapse limit for the frame-core tube structure system, but the model structure has no collapse. The torsion stiffness of the outer steel shelf is small, and the structural torsion response is dominated by the core tube. The earthquake inertia force and story shear force of the structural damage are less affected by the long-period motion components. The ductility demand of story has a large differences.

导出引用

曾繁良1，黄炎生1，周靖2. 钢管混凝土柱排架—核心筒结构抗震性能研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(12): 190-197

ZENG Fanliang1,HUANG Yansheng1,ZHOU Jing2. A study on the seismic performance of concrete-filled steel tube column-steel shelf-concrete core tube structures[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2020, 39(12): 190-197

参考文献

[1] 聂建国, 陶慕轩, 黄远, 等. 钢-混凝土组合结构体系研究新进展[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2010, 31(6): 71-80.
NIE Jianguo, Tao Muxuan, Huang Yuan, et al. Research advances of steel-concrete composte structural systems [J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2010, 31(6): 71-80.
[2] JGJ 3-2010, 高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
JGJ3-2010, Technical specification for concrete structures of tall building [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2010.
[3] 袁世聪, 蒋欢军. 不同类型连梁框架-核心筒结构抗震性能研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2017,(12): 169-174.
YUAN Shi-cong, JIANG Huan-jun. A study on seismic behaviour of a frame-core tube structure with different types of coupling beams [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(12): 169-174.
[4] 胡妤, 赵作周, 钱稼茹. 高烈度地区框架-核心筒结构中美抗震设计方法对比[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2015, 36(02): 1-9.
HU Yu, ZHAO Zuozhou, QianJiaru. Comparison of Chinese and American seismic design methods for frame-core wall structures in high seismic zone [J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2015, 36(2): 1-9.
[5] Macrae G. A., Clifton G. C., Mackinven H. The sliding hinge joint moment connection[J]. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 43(3): 202.
[6] Psycharis Ioannis N., Mouzakis Harris P. Assessment of the seismic design of precast frames with pinned connections from shaking table tests[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 10(6): 1795-1817.
[7] Bournas Dionysios A., Negro Paolo, Molina Francisco J. Pseudodynamic tests on a full-scale 3-storey precast concrete building: Behavior of the mechanical connections and floor diaphragms[J]. Engineering Structures, 2013, 57: 609-627.
[8] Reyes-Salazar A., Cervantes-Lugo J. A., Barraza A. L. Seismic response of 3D steel buildings with hybrid connections: PRC and FRC[J]. Steel & Composite Structures, 2016, 22(1): 113-139.
[9] 李国强, 胡大柱, 孙飞飞. 屈曲约束支撑铰接钢框架结构体系抗震性能[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 36(12): 120-124.
LI Guoqiang, HU Dazhu, SUN Feifei. Seismic behavior of hinge-connected steel frames with buckling restrained braces [J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition). 2008, 36(12): 120-124.
[10] 周学军, 王振, 张慧武, 等. 装配式梁柱铰接钢框架-屈曲约束钢板剪力墙体系抗震性能有限元分析[J]. 钢结构, 2016, 31(10): 20-24.
ZHOU Xuejun, WANG Zhen, ZHANG Huiwu, et al. FEM analysis of the seismic performance of fabricated steel frame-buckling-restrained steel plate shear wall system with pinned beam-column connections [J]. Steel Construction. 2016, 31(10): 20-24.
[11] 方小丹, 魏琏, 周靖. 长周期结构地震反应的特点与反应谱[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2014,(03): 16-23.
FANG Xiaodan, WEI Lian, ZHOU Jing. Characteristics of earthquake response for long-period structure and response spectrum [J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2014, 35(3): 16-23.
[12] DBJ/T 15-128-2017, 高层建筑钢-混凝土混合结构技术规程[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2017.
DBJ/T 15-128-2017, Technical specification for steel-concrete mixed structures of tall building [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2017.
[13] 缪志伟, 裘赵云, 张志强. 某消能减震钢筋混凝土框架-剪力墙结构弹塑性时程分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2013, 32(21): 164-169.
MIU Zhi-wei, QIU Zhao-yun, ZHANG Zhi-qiang. Nonlinear time-history analysis for an energy-dissipation reinforced concrete frame-shear-wall structure [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2013, 32(21): 164-169.