为合理描述TC4钛合金材料的应力流动行为，分别利用万能材料试验机、霍普金森压杆设备，进行常温和高温准静态拉伸试验、动态压缩试验。通过试验得到了材料在不同应变率、温度下的工程应力-应变曲线，发现TC4钛合金材料应变硬化效应较弱，但应变率敏感性和温度软化效应较强。其次，基于试验结果，修正Johnson-Cook ( J-C )本构模型和断裂准则获得MJC模型，并结合数值模拟标定J-C与MJC模型参数。最后，为校验模型和参数的有效性，采用ABAQUS/Explicit有限元软件建立卵形头弹体撞击靶体的模型，分别将J-C和MJC模型及参数嵌入到有限元程序中，进行数值仿真计算，对比撞击试验与数值模拟计算结果。研究表明，MJC模型预测的弹体弹道极限与靶体失效模式更接近于试验。
Abstract
In order to describe the stress flow behavior of TC4 titanium alloy reasonably, firstly,universal material testing machine and Hopkinson press bar equipment (SHPB) were respectively used to conduct normal and high temperature quasi-static tension and dynamic compression test. Engineering stress-strain curves at different strain rates and temperatures were obtained by experiments. It reveals that the strain hardening effect of TC4 titanium alloy is weak, but the strain rate sensitivity and temperature softening effect are strong. Secondly, basing on the experimental results, the Johnson-Cook constitutive model (J-C) was modified to obtain the MJC model, and also the parameters of J-C and MJC models were calibrated by numerical simulation. Finally, in order to verify the mode and its parameters, the model of plate impacted by projectile were established with ABAQUS/Explicit finite element software. Moreover, the J-C and MJC models and parameters were embedded into the finite element program respectively for numerical simulation, and also the experimental results were compared with numerical simulations. The results show that the ballistic limit of projectile and the failure mode of plate predicted by MJC model are closer to the result of experiments than J-C model.
关键词
TC4钛合金 /
本构模型 /
失效模式 /
撞击
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
TC4 titanium
/
Constitutive model /
Failure mode /
Impact
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[ 1 ] 惠旭龙, 牟让科, 白春玉. TC4钛合金动态力学性能及本构模型研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(22):161-168.
HUI Xulong, MU Rangke, BAI Chunyu. Dynamic mechanical property and constitutive model for TC4 titanium alloy[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(22):161-168.
[ 2 ] 陈刚, 陈忠富, 陶俊林. TC4动态力学性能研究[J]. 实验力学, 2005, 20(4): 605-609.
CHENG Gang, CHEN Zhongfu, TAO Junlin. Study on plastic constitutive relationship parameters of TC4 titanium[J]. Journal of Experimental Mechanics, 2005, 20(4): 605-609.
[ 3 ] Follansbee, P.S, Gray III, D.T, 1989. An analysis of the low temperature, low and high strain-rate deformation of Ti-6Al-4V[J]. Metallurgical Transactions A,1989,20(5):863-874.
[ 4 ] Donald R. Lesure. Experimental investigations of material models for Ti-6Al-4V titanium and 2024-T3 aluminum:DOT/FAA/AR-00/25[R].Washington, D.C.：Office of Aviation Research，2000.
[ 5 ] Gregory.Kay. Failure modeling of titanium 6Al-4V and aluminum 2024-T3 with the Johnson-Cook material model:DOT/FAA/AR-03/57[R].Livermore:Lawrence Livermore National Lab., 2003.
[ 6 ] LEE W S, LIN C F. Plastic deformation and fracture behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V alloy loaded with high strain rate under various temperatures[J]. Materials Science and Engineering, 1998, 241(1/2):48-59.
[ 7 ] 陈刚. 半穿甲战斗部弹体穿甲效应数值模拟与实验研究[D]. 中国工程物理研究院, 2006.
[ 8 ] 陈敏. TC4钛合金力学性能测试及动态材料模型研究[M]. 南京航空航天大学硕士论文，2012.
[ 9 ] Xinke Xiao, Zhongcheng Mu, Hao Pan,et al. Effect of the Lode parameter in predicting shear cracking of T351 aluminum alloy Taylor rods[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2018, 120:185-201.
[10 ] K.Senthil, M.A.Iqbal, P.S.Chandel. Study of the constitutive behavior of 7075-T651 aluminum alloy[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2017, 108:171-190.
[11 ] 邓云飞, 张永, 张伟岐等. TC4钛合金板抗卵形头弹冲击特性研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2019, 30(19):1-7.
Study on the impact resistance of TC4 titanium alloy plate to ogival-nosed projectiles[J]. China Mechanical Engineering.
[12 ] 司马玉州, 肖新科, 王要沛. 7A04-T6高强铝合金板对平头杆弹抗侵彻行为的试验与数值模拟研究. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(11):1-8.
SIMA Yuzhou, XIAO Xinke, WANG Yaopei. Tests and numerical simulation for anti-penetrating behavior of a high strength 7A04-T6 aluminium alloy plate against a blunt projectile’s impact. Journal of vibration and shock, 2017, 36(11):1-8.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
PDF(2610 KB)
