西安小雁塔结构模型振动台试验研究

PDF(2336 KB)

振动与冲击 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (22) : 67-75.

论文

西安小雁塔结构模型振动台试验研究

钱春宇1，徐敦峰2，浩文明2，于英文3，谢启芳2

作者信息 +

Shaking table test on a model of Xi’an Xiaoyan pagoda

QIAN Chunyu1，XU Dunfeng2，HAO Wenming2，YU Yingwen3，XIE Qifang2

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

以西安小雁塔结构为原型，对其缩尺比例为1/8的砖塔模型进行了振动台试验。模型采用旧青砖和糯米汁灰土浆作为砌筑材料以还原古代砖塔的营造特点，试验分析了结构模型在多遇以及罕遇地震烈度水平下的损伤状况、加速度响应，位移响应和层间剪力分布，并通过分析各层测点在白噪声激励下的频率响应函数，得到了结构动力特性及其变化规律。试验结果表明：模型结构鞭鞘效应明显，损伤主要集中在顶部，其破坏形态与类似结构的实际震害特点一致。在不同的地震波作用下结构响应不尽相同，其加速度位移与结构当前频率、地震波频谱特性息息相关；随着地震波加速度峰值的增大，模型一阶频率减小了27.4%，阻尼增大为2.55倍，地震加速度放大系数减小。在8度多遇地震作用下，模型结构的顶层层间位移角达到1/116，结构已达到严重破坏状态，对处于高设防烈度地区的类似古塔应采取保护措施。

Abstract

A shaking table test was conducted on a 1/8 scaled model of Xi’an Xiaoyan Pagoda.The material used in the model is the old brick and mortar of sticky rice juice.The damage, acceleration response, displacement response and the distribution of shear force in the structural model under the excitation of multiple encounters and rare earthquakes were analyzed.The dynamic characteristics were identified through analyzing the frequency response function at each measurement point under a white noise excitation.The experimental results show that the whiplash effect of the model is obvious, the damage is mainly concentrated on the top, and the failure mode is consistent with the actual seismic damage characteristics of similar structures.The model reacts differently under different seismic waves.With the increase of seismic excitation amplitude, the natural frequency drops down by 27.4%, and the first order damping ratio is increase 2.55 times compared to that without the experience of earthquakes.The displacement angle of the top storey reaches 1/116, while the structure has already entered into the state of serious damage under the action of an earthquake with 8 degrees of seismic fortification intensity.Protective measures should be taken for similar ancient towers in district of 8 degrees and above 8.

导出引用

钱春宇1，徐敦峰2，浩文明2，于英文3，谢启芳2. 西安小雁塔结构模型振动台试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(22): 67-75

QIAN Chunyu1，XU Dunfeng2，HAO Wenming2，YU Yingwen3，XIE Qifang2. Shaking table test on a model of Xi’an Xiaoyan pagoda[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2020, 39(22): 67-75

参考文献

[1] 罗哲文. 中国古塔[M]. 北京：中国青年出版社，1985.
LUO Zhewen. Chinese pagoda[M]. Beijing: China Youth Press, 1985.
[2] 陈平，贠作义，宋泽维. 砖石古塔的地震风险评估[J]. 工业建筑，2015, 45(4): 98-102.
CHEN Ping, YUN Zuoyi, SONG Zewei. Earthquake risk assessment of ancient masonry tower[J]. Industrial Construction, 2015, 45(4): 98-102.
[3] 崔晓玲，李凯，卢俊龙等. 倾斜砖石古塔随机振动测试分析[J]. 建筑结构, 2017, 47(2):70-74.
CUI Xiaoling, LI Kai, LU Junlong etal. Analysis of random vibration test of an inclined ancient masonry pagoda[J]. Building Struture, 2017, 47(2): 70-74.
[4] 沈治国．砖石古塔的力学性能及鉴定与加固方法的研究[D]．西安建筑科技大学，2005.
SHEN Zhiguo. Studies on mechanical performance appraisal and reinforcing technique of brick masonry ancient pagoda[D]. Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, 2005.
[5] 卢俊龙．实心砖石古塔动力特性与结构损伤分析[J]．力学与实践, 2016, 38(5): 560-566.
LU Junlong. Damage and dynamic characteristics analysis of a solid structure pagoda[J]. Mechanics in Engineering, 2016, 38(5): 560-566.
[6] 袁建力. 砖石古塔的震害程度与烈度的对应关系研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2013, 33(2): 164-167.
YUAN Jianli. Study on corresponding relation between seismic intensity and damage degree of ancient masonry pagodas[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2013, 33(2): 164-167.
[7] 袁建力. 砖石古塔基本周期的近似简化计算方法[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2015, 35(2): 151-156.
YUAN Jianli. A simplified method for calculating the fundamental period of ancient masonry pagodas[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2015, 35(2): 151-156.
[8] 李德虎，何江. 砖石古塔动力特性试验研究[J]. 工程抗震，1990, 12(3): 34-36.
LI Dehu, HE jiang. Experimental research on dynamic characteristic of ancient brick masonry tower[J]. Earthquake Resistant, 1990, 12(3): 34-36.
[9] 文立华，王尚文，刘洪兵．古塔抗震性能分析[J]. 工程抗震,1996(1): 21-23.
WEN Lihua, WANG Shangwen, LIU Hongbing. Analysis of seismic performance of ancient pagoda[J]. Earthquake Resistant, 1996 (1): 21-23.
[10] 孔德刚, 胡明珠, 肖碧. 砖石古塔抗震性能计算[J]. 西北地震学报, 2011, 33(s1): 424-428.
KONG Degang, HU Mingzhu, XIAO Bi. Calculation of earthquake resistant capability for masonry pagoda[J]. Northwestern seismological journal, 2011, 33(s1): 424-428.
[11] 赵祥，王社良，周福霖等. 基于SMA阻尼器的古塔模型结构振动台试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2011, 30(11): 219-223.
ZHAO Xiang, WANG Sheliang, ZHOU Fulin, etal. Shaking table test for an ancient pagoda model structure based on shape memory alloy actuating device[J]. Journal of vibration and shock, 2011, 30(11): 219-223.
[12] 沈远戈. 小雁塔抗震性能的分析和地基构造研究[D]. 西安：西安建筑科技大学, 2010.
SHEN Yuange. Seimic behavior nanlysis and foundation construction research on Xiaoyan Pagoda[D]. Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, 2008.
[13] 朱飞. 中华恐龙塔抗震性能试验研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2011.
ZHU Fei. Experimental and numerical analysis of anti-seismic performance research on China dinosaur pagoda[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2011.
[14] 刘晓莉. 砖塔模型的振动台试验研究[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2014.
LIU Xiaoli. Shaking table test on reduced scale model simulated ancient masonry pagoda[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2014.
[15] Marcos C, Roberto M. Shaking table testing and numerical simulation of the seismic response of a typical Mexican colonial temple[J]. Earthquake engineering and Structural dynamics, 2012, 41: 233-253.
[16] Kim J K. Seismic test of a full-scale model of a five-storey stone pagoda[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2003, 32(5): 731-750.
[17] 陈平，赵冬，姚谦峰. 西安小雁塔抗震能力研究[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报，2001, 31(2).
CHEN Ping, ZHAO Dong, YAO Qianfeng. A research of the seismic behavior of Xi’an Xiaoyan Pagoda [J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, 2001, 31(2).
[18] 《砌体基本力学性能试验标准》（GB/T50129-2011）[M]. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2011.
《Standard test method for basic mechanical properties of masonry. Beijing》[M]. Beijing: China building industry press, 2011.
[19] 周颖，吕西林. 建筑结构振动台模型试验方法与技术[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2012.
ZHOU Ying, LU Xilin. Method and technology for shaking table test of building structures[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2012.
[20] 刘红彪, 李宏男. 地震模拟振动台试验模型相似设计中的材料弹性模量取值问题研究[J]. 振动与冲击，2016, 35(3).
LIU Hongbiao, LI Hongnan. Evaluation method for material elastic modulus in the similitude design of structural shaking table test. [J]. Journal of vibration and shock, 2016, 35(3).
[21] 《建筑抗震设计规范》（GB50011-2010）[M]. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
《Code for seismic design of building》(GB50011-2010）[M]. Beijing: China building industry press, 2010.
[22] 陆伟东.基于MATLAB的地震模拟振动台试验的数据处理[J]. 南京工业大学学报（自然版）, 2001, 33(6): 1-4.
LU Weidong. MATLAB-based data processing of shaking table test[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Technology (Natural Science Edition) , 2001, 33(6): 1-4.
[23] 李涛，王社良，杨涛. 砖石古塔结构振动台试验模型设计与试验验证[J]. 振动工程学报，2018, 31(02): 314-322.
LI Tao, WANG Sheliang, YANG Tao. Design and experimental verification of shaking table test model of brick masonry structure in ancient pagoda[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2018, 31(02): 314-322.
[24] Sozen M A. Review of earthquake response of reinforced concrete buildings with a view to drift control[C]. 7th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.Michigan:University of Michigan Press, 1980.
[25] 杨远威, 钱德玲, 佟国锋. 超高层混凝土框架-核心筒结构试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(16):181-186.
YANG Yuanwei, QIAN Deling, TONG Guofeng. Experimental study on a super high-rise building with a concrete frame-core tube [J]. Journal of vibration and shock, 2016, 35(16): 181-186.