低阻尼柔性结构在外界荷载激励下可能产生大幅位移，严重情况下将造成构件损伤，导致结构失效或破坏。研究了一种双向运动的非线性弹簧限位器对柔性结构的缓冲限位性能，推导并采用拟静力试验验证了该装置的出力与变形的理论计算公式。最后基于单自由度主结构模型，对比分析了线性与非线性限位器对主结构的缓冲限位性能，并研究了非线性弹簧刚度对其性能的影响。结果表明：非线性弹簧本构理论式与试验值存在一定差异，并据此提出考虑初位移的理论计算式。在初位移较小时，两种理论计算式均可作为工程运用时的理论依据。非线性弹簧限位器具有准零刚度的特性，在限位器开始工作时，非线性弹簧限位器能够较平缓地降低主结构运动速度。在随机荷载作用下，非线性弹簧具有与线性弹簧相当的限位能力，且能显著减小对结构的反冲作用，同时合理地设置非线性弹簧刚度不仅能有效控制主结构位移，而且能减少非线性弹簧限位器对主结构的反冲力。
Abstract
Flexible structures with low damping may have large-amplitude displacements under excitation of external loads, which cause damages of the components, and even structural failure in severe cases.Here, the buffering and limiting performance of a bi-directional nonlinear spring restrictor for flexible structures was studied, and the theoretical calculation formula for force and deformation of the device was derived and verified with pseudo-static tests.Finally, based on a single-DOF main structure model, buffer limit performances of linear and nonlinear restrictors were compared and analyzed, and effects of the nonlinear spring stiffness on its performance were studied.Results showed that the calculated results with the theoretical calculation formula of the nonlinear spring do not agree well with test ones, then a theoretical calculation formula considering initial displacement is proposed; when the initial displacement is smaller, both two theoretical calculation formulas can be a theoretical basis for practical application; the nonlinear spring restrictor has characteristics of quasi-zero stiffness, when it starts to work, it can reduce the main structure’s motion speed more gently; under random loads, the nonlinear spring has the same limiting capacity as that of a linear spring, and can significantly reduce recoil action on structure; the reasonably setting of its stiffness not only can effectively control displacements of the main structure, but also reduce its recoil force on the main structure.
关键词
结构振动 /
非线性弹簧 /
加载试验 /
限位性能 /
反冲力
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
structural vibration /
nonlinear spring /
loading test /
position limiting performance /
recoil force
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 阎维明,周福霖,谭平.土木工程结构振动控制的研究进展[J]. 世界地震工程, 1997(2):8-20.
Zhai Weim-ing, Zhou Fu-lin, Tan Ping. Research progress in vibration control of civil engineering structures [J]. World earthquake engineering, 1997(2):8-20.
[2] 毛剑琴,卜庆忠,张杰,等.结构振动控制的新进展[J]. 控制理论与应用, 2001, 18(5):647-652.
Mao Jian-qin, Bu Qing-zhong, Zhang Jie, et al. New progress in structural vibration control [J]. Control Theory and Applications, 2001, 18(5): 647-652.
[3] Aiken I D, Nims D K, Kelly J M. Comparative Study of Four Passive Energy Dissipation Systems [J]. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 1992, 25(3) : 175-192.
[4] Ali H E M, Abdel-Ghaffar A M. Seismic energy dissipation for cable stayed bridges using passive devices [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1994, 23(8) : 877-893.
[5] Moon S J, Bergman L A, Voulgaris P G. Sliding mode control of cable-stayed bridge subjected to seismic excitation [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2003, 129(1) : 71-78.
[6] Sharabash A M, Andrawes B O. Application of shape memory alloy dampers in the seismic control of cable-stayed bridges [J]. Engineering Structures, 2009, 31(2) : 607-616.
[7] 杜红凯,韩淼,闫维明. 约束U形钢板力学性能的计算方法研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2014(S2) :158-163.
Du Hong-kai, Han Wei, Yan Wei-ming. Study on calculation method of mechanical properties of constrained U-Shaped steel plates [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2014(S2):158-163.
[8] 王雪,曾庆东,张晓婷,等. 汽车悬架液压限位减振器研究综述[J]. 汽车实用技术,2015(05) :148-150.
Wang Xue, Zeng Qing-dong, Zhang Xiao-ting, et al. Review of research on hydraulic limit vibration absorber of automobile suspension [J]. Automobile Practical Technology, 2015(05): 148-150.
[9] Pawar H B, Desale D D. Optimization of three wheeler front suspension coil spring [J]. Procedia Manufacturing, 2018, 20 : 428-433.
[10] 叶列平,冯鹏. FRP在工程结构中的应用与发展[J]. 土木工程学报,2006(03):24-36.
Ye Li-ping, Feng Peng. Application and development of FRP in engineering structure [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2006(03): 24-36.
[11] 熊鑫,金晶,吴新跃,等. 钢丝绳隔振器结构抗冲击设计与优化[J]. 海军工程大学学报, 2017.
Xiong Xin, Jin Jing, Wu Xin-yue, et al. Anti-shock aesign and optimization of wire rope isolator [J]. Journal of Naval University of Engineering, 2017.
[12] Saiidi M S, Johnson R, Maragakis E M. Development, Shake table testing, and design of FRP seismic restrainers [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2006, 11(4): 499-506.
[13] 韩娟,方海,刘伟庆,等. 桥墩防船舶撞击研究概述[J]. 公路,2013(10): 60-66.
Han Juan, Fang Hai, Liu Wei-qing, et al. Overview of research on anti-Ship collision of bridge piers [J]. Highway, 2013(10): 60-66.
[14] 侯跃鹏. 桥墩在船舶撞击下的动力响应分析及防撞措施研究[D]. 天津大学,2015.
Hou Yue-peng. Dynamic response analysis and anti-collision measures of bridge piers under ship impact [D]. Tianjin University, 2015.
[15] 吕志强,施亮,赵应龙. 气囊浮筏隔振装置姿态控制问题[J]. 噪声与振动控制,2013,33(01): 40-44.
Lü Zhi-qiang, Shi Liang, Zhao Ying-long. Attitude control problem of airbag floating raft isolation device [J]. Noise and Vibration Control, 2013, 33(01): 40-44.
[16] 刘渊博. 限位器—气囊—旋转机械系统非线性动力学研究[D]. 西安科技大学,2015.
Liu Yuan-bo. Nonlinear Dynamics of the limiter-balloon-rotary mechanical system [D]. Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2015.
[17] 李海涛,李佳,贺华,等. 橡胶隔振器冲击特性的试验研究[J]. 噪声与振动控制,2015,(1): 29-32,77.
Li Hai-tao, Li Jia, He Hua, et al. Experimental study on impact characteristics of rubber vibration Isolator [J]. Noise and Vibration Control, 2015, (1): 29-32, 77.
[18] Andrawes B, DesRoches R. Effect of ambient temperature on the hinge opening in bridges with shape memory alloy seismic restrainers [J]. Engineering Structures, 2006, 29(9): 2294-2301.
[19] 陈政清,裴炳志,张门哲,等.一种非线性剪切型弹簧组件:CN109826085A[P].2019.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
PDF(1418 KB)
