为研究爆炸冲击作用下节段拼装桥墩的破坏模式和损伤评估方法，采用ANSYS/LS-DYNA建立方形截面整体式桥墩和节段拼装桥墩受爆的三维实体分离式模型。基于与爆炸试验结果的对比分析，验证该模拟方法的可靠性。通过改变爆炸TNT当量和爆炸距离，对比分析了不同超压作用下整体式桥墩与节段拼装桥墩的应力变化、破坏模式与损伤机理，并提出结合截面损伤与墩身侧移的桥墩受爆损伤评估方法。结果表明：在爆炸冲击与恒载共同作用下，整体式桥墩主要呈现剪切破坏与弯剪破坏，节段拼装桥墩主要呈现剪切破坏与局部破坏；在不同比例距离的爆炸冲击作用下，桥墩的损伤均可分为完全弹性、部分弹性及失去弹性等三种状态；节段拼装桥墩在受到爆炸冲击作用后，墩身节段间产生较大相对转角和位移，进而导致节段截面削弱和墩身侧移；两种体系桥墩均可采用截面削弱与墩身侧移相结合的方法，进行爆炸损伤的定量评估。
Abstract
In order to investigate failure mode and damage assessment method for segmental assembled piers under blast impact, 3-D solid separated models of integral pier with square section and segmental assembled pier under blast were established using the software ANSYS/LS-DYNA.The reliability of this simulation method was verified by comparing the numerical results and the blast test ones.By changing the blast’s TNT equivalent and blast distance, the stress variation, failure mode and damage mechanism of integral pier and segmental assembled one under different overpressure actions were contrastively analyzed, and the method for evaluating pier blast damage combined with pier section damage and its lateral displacement was proposed.Results showed that under combined action of blast impact and dead load, integral piers mainly exhibit shear failure and bending-shear failure, while segmental assembled piers present shear failure and local failure; under action of blast impact with different scaled distances, pier damage can be divided into 3 states of complete elasticity, partial elasticity and loss of elasticity; after segmental assembled piers are subjected to blast impact, larger relative rotating angle and displacement occur between segments to cause weakening of pier section and pier body lateral displacement; blast damage for both bridge piers of the two systems can be quantitatively evaluated with the combination method of section weakening and pier body lateral displacement.
关键词
节段拼装桥墩 /
破坏机理 /
抗爆性能 /
损伤评估
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
segmental assembled pier /
failure mechanism /
anti-blast performance /
damage assessment
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Kyei C, Braimah A. Effects of transverse reinforcement spacing on the response of reinforced concrete columns subjected to blast loading[J]. Engineering Structures, 2017, 142: 148-164.
[2] Li J, Hao H. Numerical study of concrete spall damage to blast loads[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2014, 68: 41-55.
[3] Mutalib A A, Hao H. Development of P-I diagrams for FRP strengthened RC columns[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2011, 38(5): 290-304.
[4] 张于晔, 吴刚, 孙泽阳, 等. 采用混合体系的预制拼装桥墩抗震性能分析[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 39(01): 70-80.
ZHANG Yu-ye, WU Gang, SUN Ze-yang, TENG Ge. Analysis of seismic performance of a prefabricated hybrid bridge pier system[J]. Journal of Chang’an University: Natural Science Edition, 2019, 39(01): 70-80.
[5] Zhang X H, Hao H, Li C. Multi-hazard resistance capacity of precast segmental columns under impact and cyclic loading[J]. International Journal of Protective Structures, 2018, 9(1): 24-43.
[6] Tin V. Do, Thong M, Hao H. Impact response and capacity of precast concrete segmental versus monolithic bridge columns[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2019, 24(6): 04019050.
[7] Li J, Hao H, Wu C. Numerical study of precast segmental column under blast loads[J]. Engineering Structures, 2017, 134: 125-137.
[8] 杨旭, 张于晔, 张宁. 爆炸冲击作用下预制节段拼装桥墩的动态响应与损伤分析[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(3): 1-8.
YANG Xu, ZHANG Yu-ye, ZHANG Ning. Dynamic response and damage analysis of precast segmental piers under blast impact[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(3): 1-8.
[9] Wesevich J W, Oswald C J. Empirical Based Concrete Masonry Pressure-Impulse Diagrams for Varying Degrees of Damage[J]. Structures Congress, 2005: 2083-2094.
[10] Shi Y, Hao H, LI Z. Numerical derivation of pressure –impulse diagrams for prediction of RC column damage to blast loads[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2008, 35(11): 1213-1227.
[11] 崔莹, 赵均海, 张常光, 等. 复式空心钢管混凝土柱抗爆性能及损伤研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(21): 188-216.
CUI Ying, ZHAO Jun-hai, ZHANG Chang-guang, et al. Explosion-resistance behavior and damage assessment of a duplex hollow CFST column subjected to blast loading[J]. Journal of vibration and shock, 2015, 34(21): 188-216.
[12] 田志敏, 章俊豪, 江世永. 钢板混凝土复合梁在爆炸荷载作用下的损伤评估研究[J]. 振动与冲击,2016,35(4):42-48.
TIAN Zhi-min, ZHANG Jun-hao, JIANG Shi-yong. Damage assessment for steel-concrete composite beams subjected to blast loading[J]. Journal of vibration and shock,2016, 35(4): 42-48.
[13] 住房与城乡建设部. 装配式混凝土结构技术规程（JGJ 1-2014 ）[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2014.
[14] 杨军, 杨国梁, 张光雄. 建筑结构爆破拆除数值模拟[M]. 科学出版社, 2012.
[15] 李楠, 赵均海, 吴赛, 等. 钢纤维高强混凝土墙基于CONWEP的爆炸响应[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 46(6): 833-838, 855.
LI Nan, ZHAO Hai-jun, WU Sai, et al. Blast response of steel fiber reinforced high strength concrete walls based on CONWEP[J]. Xi'an Univ. of Arch. & Tech. (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 46(6): 833-838, 855.
[16] 李国强, 瞿海雁, 杨涛春, 等. 钢管混凝土柱抗爆性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2013, 12(34): 9-17.
LI Guo-qiang , QU Hai-yan, YANG Tao-chun, et al. Experimental study of concrete-filled steel tubular columns under blast loading[J]. Journal of Building Structures. 2013, 12(34): 9-17.
[17] Yao S, Zhang D, Lu F, et al. A combined experimental and numerical investigation on the scaling laws for steel box structures subjected to internal blast loading[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2017, 102: 36-46.
[18] Shuichi F, Michel B. Experimental investigation of seismically resistant bridge piers under blast loading[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering. 2011, 16(1): 63-71.
[19] Codina R, Ambrosini D, deBorbón F. Alternatives to prevent the failure of RC members under close-in blast loadings[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2016, 60: 96-106.
[20] 陈骥. 钢结构稳定理论与设计[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014.
[21] 顾乡. 落石冲击作用下桥梁墩柱损伤和防护研究[D]. 西南交通大学, 2017.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
PDF(2357 KB)
