振动台试验新型叠层剪切模型箱的设计与性能测试

PDF(2221 KB)

振动与冲击 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5) : 201-207.

论文

安军海1,2,陶连金2

作者信息 +

Shaking table tests for design and performance of a new type laminar shear model box

AN Junhai1,2, TAO Lianjin2

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

振动台模型试验是开展地震作用下土-地下结构动力相互作用研究的重要手段，而模型箱的性质将直接影响到试验结果的准确性。基于结构动力学的基本原理，设计研制了设有可调节弹簧和阻尼装置的层状剪切模型箱，并对其有效性进行了试验验证；同时，基于ANSYS 软件对模型箱的动力性能开展了模拟分析。试验和分析结果表明，研制的设有可调节弹簧和阻尼装置的全仿真层状剪切模型箱具有良好的真实场地无限边界条件的模拟效果，可体现土-地下结构相互作用体系的动力反应是由速度和位移控制的特点；针对不同试验中所选择的模型土种类的不同，该模型箱可调整其自身性能，以满足试验对降低模型箱边界效应的要求。该模型箱的研制为今后其他岩土地震工程问题研究中试验箱的选择提供了新思路。

Abstract

Shaking table model test is an important means to study soil-underground structure dynamic interaction under earthquake.The property of soil filled model box directly affects the correctness of test results.Here, based on the basic principle of structural dynamics, a laminar shear model box with adjustable spring and damping was designed, and its effectiveness was verified with shaking table tests.Meanwhile, the dynamic performance of the model box was analyzed with the software ANSYS.The test and analysis results showed that the designed laminar shear model box with adjustable spring and damping has a good effect to simulate actual site with infinite boundary condition, and reflect a soil-underground structure interaction system’s dynamic response feature of being controlled by speed and displacement; the performance of model box can be adjusted according to type of model soil to meet test’s requirement of reducing model box boundary effect; the developed laminar shear box can provide a new idea for selection of test box in other geotechnical seismic engineering problems. 

导出引用

安军海1,2,陶连金2. 振动台试验新型叠层剪切模型箱的设计与性能测试[J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(5): 201-207

AN Junhai1,2, TAO Lianjin2. Shaking table tests for design and performance of a new type laminar shear model box[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2020, 39(5): 201-207

参考文献

[1] MIZUNO H, IIBA M. Shaking table testing of seismic building-pile-soil interaction[C]//Proceeding of 8th World Conf. Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco: [s. n.],1982, 3: 649-656.
[2] 杨林德, 季倩倩, 郑永来, 等. 软土地铁车站结构的振动台模型试验[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2003, 40(1): 7-11.
YANG Lin-de, JI Qian-qian, ZHENG Yong-lai, et al.Shaking table test on metro station structures in soft soil[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2003, 40(1): 7-11.
[3] 杜修力, 李霞, 陈国兴, 等. 悬挂式层状多向剪切模型箱的设计分析及试验验证[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 44(3): 424-432.
DU Xiu-li, LI Xia, CHEN Guo-xing, et al. Design and test verification of suspension multidirectional laminar shear model box[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 2012, 44(3): 424-432.
[4] 李积栋,陶连金,安军海,等.近远场地震动作用密贴交叉组合地铁车站振动台试验[J].土木工程学报,2015,48(10):30-37.
LI Ji-dong, TAO Lian-jin, AN Jun-hai, et al. Shaking table test of the closely-attached intersecting subway station under far-field and near-field ground motion[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal Civil Engineering Journal,2015,48(10):30-37.
[5] MEYMAND P. Shaking table scale model test of nonlinear soil-pile superstructure interaction in soft clay[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Berkeley: University of California Berkeley，1998.
[6] 孙海峰,景立平,孟宪春,等. 振动台试验三维叠层剪切箱研制[J].振动与冲击, 2012,31(17):26-32.
SUN Hai-feng, JING Li-ping, MENG Xian-chun, et al. A three-dimensional laminar shear soil container for shaking table test[J]. Journal of vibration and shock, 2012,31(17):26-32.
[7] 陈国兴, 王志华, 左熹, 等. 振动台试验叠层剪切型土箱的研制[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(1): 89-97.
CHEN Guo-xing, WANG Zhi-hua, ZUO Xi, et al. Development of laminar shear soil container for shaking table tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(1): 89-97.
[8] 陈国兴.岩土地震工程学[M].北京：科学出版社，2007. CHEN Guo-xing. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering[M]:Beijing: Science Press,2007.
[9] 张学明,闫维明,陈彦江,等.考虑行波效应的沉管隧道抗震性能:振动台阵试验研究[J].振动与冲击,2018,37(02):76-84.
ZHANG Xue-ming, YAN Wei-ming, CHEN Yan-jing, et al. Shaking tables tests for an immersed tunnel model considering wave passage effect[J]. Journal of vibration and shock, 2018,37(02):76-84.
[10] 陈国兴,左熹,杜修力.土-地下结构体系地震反应的简化分析方法[J].岩土力学,2010,31(S1):1-7. CHEN Guo-xing, ZUO Xi, DU Xiu-li. A simplified method of seismic response analysis of soil-underground structure system[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2010,31(S1):1-7.
[11] CHEN Su, LI Xiaojun, ZHANG Hong, et al. Vision-based displacement test method for high-rise building shaking table test[J]. Journal of Vibroengineering, 2015,17(8):4057-4068.
[12] 黄春霞，张鸿儒，隋志龙. 大型叠层剪切变形模型箱的研制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2006，25(10)：2128-2134.
HUANG Chunxia, ZHANG Hongru，SUI Zhilong. Development of large-scale laminar shear model box[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2006，25(10)：2128-2134.
[13] 丁祖德,张博,李晓琴,等.衬砌脱空对隧道地震响应影响的振动台试验研究[J].振动与冲击,2018,37(14):156-161.
DING Zu-de, ZHANG Bo, LI Xiao-qin, et al. Shaking table tests for investigating the effect of void behind lining on the seismic responses of a tunnel[J]. Journal of vibration and shock, 2012, 2018,37(14):156-161.
[14] 刘汉香,许强,邹威,等.层状岩质斜坡竖向动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J].振动与冲击,2012,31(22):13-19+28.LIU Han-xiang, XU Qiang, ZOU Wei, et al. Shaking table test for vertical dynamic resonse behavior of layered rock slopes[J]. Journal of vibration and shock, 2012,31(22):13-19+28.
[15] 李振宝，李晓亮，唐贞云等. 土-结构动力相互作用的振动台试验研究综述[J].震灾防御技术，2010，05 (4) :439-450.
LI Zhengbao, LI Xiaoliang, TANG Zhenyun, et al. Review of shaking table test of soil structure dynamic interaction [J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2010，05 (4) :439-450.
[16] 安军海,陶连金,王焕杰,等.可液化场地下盾构扩挖地铁车站结构地震破坏机制振动台试验[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2017,36(08):2018-2030.
AN Jun-hai, TAO Lian-jin, WANG Huan-jie, et al. Shaking table experiments on seismic response of a shield-enlarge-dig type subway station structure in liquefiable ground[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2017,36(08):2018-2030.
[17] 刘晶波，杜修力.结构动力学[M].北京：机械工业社，2005. LIU Jing-bo, DU Xiu-li. Structural Dynamics[M]:Beijing: CHINA MACHINE PRESS.
[18] 唐亮, 凌贤长, 徐鹏举, 等. 可液化场地高承台群桩-土-桥梁结构地震相互作用振动台试验[J].中国公路学报, 2010, 23(4): 51-57.
TANG Liang, LING Xian-chang, XU Peng-ju, et al. Shaking table test for seismic interaction of pile groups-soil-bridge structure with elevated cap in liquefiable ground[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2010, 23(4): 51-57.